A review of the use of inhaled nitric oxide in the PICU at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, 2011-2015: A retrospective cohort study

IF 0.8 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
S. Padayachee, S. Salie
{"title":"A review of the use of inhaled nitric oxide in the PICU at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, 2011-2015: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"S. Padayachee, S. Salie","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i2.416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) functions as a selective pulmonary vasodilator. It is an expensive treatment that is often employed as rescue therapy for refractory hypoxaemia in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary hypertension (PHT) following cardiac surgery. Objectives To describe the use of iNO and the cost of treatment in our paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Methods A retrospective descriptive study of all patients treated with iNO in the PICU at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital (RCWMCH) from 2011 - 2015. Results We treated 140 patients with iNO, 82 for PHT following cardiac surgery, 53 for ARDS and 5 for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). A response to treatment was observed in 64% of the cohort as a whole, 80% of those with PPHN, 67% of those with PHT post-cardiac surgery, and 64% of those with ARDS. A longer duration of PICU and hospital admission, and higher in-hospital mortality (53%), was seen in the group with ARDS, in particular those with adenoviral infection (63%), when compared with patients treated for PHT post-cardiac surgery (18%) and for PPHN (20%). The total cost of treatment with iNO was ZAR1 441 376 for the 5-year period studied. There are no protocols guiding the use of iNO in our unit, and it was found that response to treatment was not being objectively measured and documented, and that practice varied between clinicians. Conclusion Considering the cost of treatment and lack of evidence showing improved outcomes with iNO therapy, its continued use in our resource-limited setting should be guided by protocol. Contributions of the study There is a paucity of data regarding the indications for use, and outcomes of patients treated with iNO in resource-limited settings. We did not find evidence of improved outcomes in patients treated with iNO despite the high costs of the therapy. Protocols should be developed to guide the use of iNO in resource-limited settings.","PeriodicalId":42653,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i2.416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) functions as a selective pulmonary vasodilator. It is an expensive treatment that is often employed as rescue therapy for refractory hypoxaemia in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary hypertension (PHT) following cardiac surgery. Objectives To describe the use of iNO and the cost of treatment in our paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Methods A retrospective descriptive study of all patients treated with iNO in the PICU at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital (RCWMCH) from 2011 - 2015. Results We treated 140 patients with iNO, 82 for PHT following cardiac surgery, 53 for ARDS and 5 for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). A response to treatment was observed in 64% of the cohort as a whole, 80% of those with PPHN, 67% of those with PHT post-cardiac surgery, and 64% of those with ARDS. A longer duration of PICU and hospital admission, and higher in-hospital mortality (53%), was seen in the group with ARDS, in particular those with adenoviral infection (63%), when compared with patients treated for PHT post-cardiac surgery (18%) and for PPHN (20%). The total cost of treatment with iNO was ZAR1 441 376 for the 5-year period studied. There are no protocols guiding the use of iNO in our unit, and it was found that response to treatment was not being objectively measured and documented, and that practice varied between clinicians. Conclusion Considering the cost of treatment and lack of evidence showing improved outcomes with iNO therapy, its continued use in our resource-limited setting should be guided by protocol. Contributions of the study There is a paucity of data regarding the indications for use, and outcomes of patients treated with iNO in resource-limited settings. We did not find evidence of improved outcomes in patients treated with iNO despite the high costs of the therapy. Protocols should be developed to guide the use of iNO in resource-limited settings.
2011-2015年红十字战争纪念儿童医院PICU吸入一氧化氮的回顾性队列研究
背景:吸入型一氧化氮(iNO)是一种选择性肺血管扩张剂。这是一种昂贵的治疗方法,通常用于心脏手术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和肺动脉高压(PHT)难治性低氧血症的抢救治疗。目的了解小儿重症监护病房(PICU)使用iNO的情况及治疗费用。方法对2011 - 2015年红十字战争纪念儿童医院PICU收治的所有iNO患儿进行回顾性描述性研究。结果共治疗140例iNO患者,其中82例为心脏手术后PHT, 53例为ARDS, 5例为新生儿持续性肺动脉高压(PPHN)。在整个队列中,64%的患者对治疗有反应,80%的PPHN患者,67%的心脏手术后PHT患者和64%的ARDS患者对治疗有反应。与心脏手术后接受PHT治疗的患者(18%)和接受PPHN治疗的患者(20%)相比,ARDS组的PICU和住院时间更长,住院死亡率更高(53%),尤其是腺病毒感染的患者(63%)。在研究的5年期间,iNO治疗的总费用为1 441 376 ZAR1。在我们单位没有指导使用iNO的协议,并且发现对治疗的反应没有被客观地测量和记录,并且临床医生之间的做法各不相同。结论考虑到治疗费用和缺乏证据表明iNO治疗改善了结果,在我国资源有限的情况下,应根据方案指导其继续使用。研究的贡献在资源有限的环境中,关于使用iNO的适应症和患者治疗的结果的数据缺乏。尽管治疗费用高,但我们没有发现使用iNO治疗的患者预后改善的证据。应制定协议,指导在资源有限的情况下使用国际信息组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes scientific articles related to multidisciplinary critical and intensive medical care and the emergency care of critically ill humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信