School Siting and Walkability: Experience and Policy Implications in California

J. Vincent, Ruth Miller, Lianne Dillon
{"title":"School Siting and Walkability: Experience and Policy Implications in California","authors":"J. Vincent, Ruth Miller, Lianne Dillon","doi":"10.5070/P2CJPP9336923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Vincent, Jeffrey M.; Miller, Ruth; Dillon, Lianne | Abstract: Active School Commuting (ASC) and K-12 school siting policies and practices have garnered increased attention in recent years from the planning and public health fields. Of central concern is that, too often, new school siting choices contribute to sprawl and inhibit active transportation to school because they are located far from where students live and/or lack surrounding pedestrian-oriented street characteristics. California has made state policy strides in actively promoting healthy communities, which has included an interest in ensuring communities and school sites are more walkable. To inform this policy area, this study measures the walkability around a sample of schools sited and constructed in six high-growth counties in California from 2003-2011. As California looks to implement a Health in All Policies approach into state decision making (Executive Order S-04-10), and weave health, equity, and environmental sustainability into more policies, a better understanding of the relationship between school siting and walkability is needed, particularly considering that the state provides funds to school districts for new school construction projects. Amidst these state health-promoting efforts, there is not clarity on how walkable newly sited schools are. Our research with this study addresses this gap. Our findings show that the proportion of new schools sited in our study period in California that could be considered objectively walkable by American urban standards is small. Thus, it does seem that state policy actions that would increase the number of walkability around schools may be needed to realize broader healthy community objectives. Local inter-agency and inter-jurisdictional collaboration can likely realize co-benefits that lead to healthy, sustainable communities with improved educational opportunities. Clarity in state policies, guidance, and funding priorities would likely improve collaborative local planning for better outcomes in health, education, and sustainability, which, in turn, maximize investments across sectors. We add to these findings a discussion of recent policy efforts to improve school siting outcomes in California such that they are promoting health and walkability.","PeriodicalId":89903,"journal":{"name":"California journal of politics and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/P2CJPP9336923","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California journal of politics and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/P2CJPP9336923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Author(s): Vincent, Jeffrey M.; Miller, Ruth; Dillon, Lianne | Abstract: Active School Commuting (ASC) and K-12 school siting policies and practices have garnered increased attention in recent years from the planning and public health fields. Of central concern is that, too often, new school siting choices contribute to sprawl and inhibit active transportation to school because they are located far from where students live and/or lack surrounding pedestrian-oriented street characteristics. California has made state policy strides in actively promoting healthy communities, which has included an interest in ensuring communities and school sites are more walkable. To inform this policy area, this study measures the walkability around a sample of schools sited and constructed in six high-growth counties in California from 2003-2011. As California looks to implement a Health in All Policies approach into state decision making (Executive Order S-04-10), and weave health, equity, and environmental sustainability into more policies, a better understanding of the relationship between school siting and walkability is needed, particularly considering that the state provides funds to school districts for new school construction projects. Amidst these state health-promoting efforts, there is not clarity on how walkable newly sited schools are. Our research with this study addresses this gap. Our findings show that the proportion of new schools sited in our study period in California that could be considered objectively walkable by American urban standards is small. Thus, it does seem that state policy actions that would increase the number of walkability around schools may be needed to realize broader healthy community objectives. Local inter-agency and inter-jurisdictional collaboration can likely realize co-benefits that lead to healthy, sustainable communities with improved educational opportunities. Clarity in state policies, guidance, and funding priorities would likely improve collaborative local planning for better outcomes in health, education, and sustainability, which, in turn, maximize investments across sectors. We add to these findings a discussion of recent policy efforts to improve school siting outcomes in California such that they are promoting health and walkability.
学校选址和可步行性:加州的经验和政策启示
作者:Vincent, Jeffrey M.;米勒,露丝;摘要近年来,活跃学校通勤和K-12学校选址政策和实践受到规划和公共卫生领域的越来越多的关注。人们最关心的是,新学校的选址往往会导致学校的扩张,并抑制到学校的主动交通,因为它们离学生居住的地方很远,而且/或者周围缺乏以步行为导向的街道特征。加州在积极促进健康社区方面取得了州政策上的进步,其中包括确保社区和学校更适合步行。为了向这一政策领域提供信息,本研究测量了2003-2011年间在加州六个高增长县建立和建设的学校样本周围的可步行性。由于加州希望将“健康贯穿所有政策”的方针纳入州决策(行政命令S-04-10),并将健康、公平和环境可持续性纳入更多政策,因此需要更好地了解学校选址与步行性之间的关系,特别是考虑到该州为学区提供新学校建设项目的资金。在这些州促进健康的努力中,尚不清楚新建的学校是否适合步行。我们的研究解决了这一差距。我们的研究结果表明,在我们的研究期间,加州的新学校中,客观上可以被美国城市标准视为可步行的比例很小。因此,为了实现更广泛的健康社区目标,似乎确实需要采取国家政策行动,增加学校周围的可步行性。地方机构间和司法管辖区间的合作很可能实现共同利益,从而建立健康、可持续的社区,改善教育机会。国家政策、指导和资金优先事项的明确可能会改善地方协作规划,从而在卫生、教育和可持续性方面取得更好的成果,从而最大限度地提高各部门的投资。除了这些发现,我们还讨论了最近在加州为改善学校选址结果所做的政策努力,以促进健康和可步行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书