Why being sustainable is not enough: embracing a net positive impact

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
U. Lichtenthaler
{"title":"Why being sustainable is not enough: embracing a net positive impact","authors":"U. Lichtenthaler","doi":"10.1108/jbs-09-2021-0153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper develops the concept of positive sustainability or positainability to go beyond many leaders’ traditional understanding of sustainability as primarily avoiding harm. Rather, executives need to embrace a positive perspective in terms of doing good and creating value in a firm’s core business as the next level of sustainability management. Positive sustainability is defined as the combination of doing good and avoiding bad to arrive at innovative solutions for achieving a “net positive impact” in the core business rather than merely targeting “no net loss” by reducing harm for the environment and society.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis is a conceptual paper with an example, and it relies on prior insights from related research fields, including the sustainable development goals, corporate social responsibility, creating shared value, positive psychology, social entrepreneurship and social innovation.\n\n\nFindings\nMany organizations have recently launched sustainability initiatives, which often focus on achieving efficiency gains, for example, by reducing power consumption to lower carbon emissions in the face of climate change and to simultaneously save costs. In future competition, however, avoiding unsustainability in the core business and potentially doing good in separate social responsibility programs will not be enough. Furthermore, a focus on “quick win” efficiency gains may limit a more fundamental transformation, which is needed in many firms. There is a massive shift in consumer expectations, especially among younger generations, concerning firms’ active contribution to solving environmental and social challenges. Consistent with positive psychology, these market shifts require a positive perspective in terms of doing good in the core business.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe concept of positive sustainability has major implications for innovation, transformation and communications management. Even those firms that view themselves as leaders hardly realize the opportunities from positive sustainability. By developing innovative solutions, products and services, companies may positively contribute to the environment and society. In the medium to long term, this positive impact will often exceed the short-term benefits of efficiency-centered programs. Most firms and leaders will simply have no choice but to embrace a “net positive impact” because customers strongly expect companies to take action in terms of positive sustainability.\n","PeriodicalId":55881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Strategy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-09-2021-0153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This paper develops the concept of positive sustainability or positainability to go beyond many leaders’ traditional understanding of sustainability as primarily avoiding harm. Rather, executives need to embrace a positive perspective in terms of doing good and creating value in a firm’s core business as the next level of sustainability management. Positive sustainability is defined as the combination of doing good and avoiding bad to arrive at innovative solutions for achieving a “net positive impact” in the core business rather than merely targeting “no net loss” by reducing harm for the environment and society. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual paper with an example, and it relies on prior insights from related research fields, including the sustainable development goals, corporate social responsibility, creating shared value, positive psychology, social entrepreneurship and social innovation. Findings Many organizations have recently launched sustainability initiatives, which often focus on achieving efficiency gains, for example, by reducing power consumption to lower carbon emissions in the face of climate change and to simultaneously save costs. In future competition, however, avoiding unsustainability in the core business and potentially doing good in separate social responsibility programs will not be enough. Furthermore, a focus on “quick win” efficiency gains may limit a more fundamental transformation, which is needed in many firms. There is a massive shift in consumer expectations, especially among younger generations, concerning firms’ active contribution to solving environmental and social challenges. Consistent with positive psychology, these market shifts require a positive perspective in terms of doing good in the core business. Originality/value The concept of positive sustainability has major implications for innovation, transformation and communications management. Even those firms that view themselves as leaders hardly realize the opportunities from positive sustainability. By developing innovative solutions, products and services, companies may positively contribute to the environment and society. In the medium to long term, this positive impact will often exceed the short-term benefits of efficiency-centered programs. Most firms and leaders will simply have no choice but to embrace a “net positive impact” because customers strongly expect companies to take action in terms of positive sustainability.
为什么只有可持续发展是不够的:拥抱净积极影响
目的本文发展了积极可持续性或可假设性的概念,超越了许多领导人对可持续性的传统理解,即主要是避免伤害。相反,作为下一级的可持续发展管理,高管们需要从积极的角度看待如何在公司的核心业务中做好事和创造价值。积极的可持续性被定义为行善和避免坏事的结合,以达成创新的解决方案,在核心业务中实现“净积极影响”,而不仅仅是通过减少对环境和社会的危害来实现“无净损失”。设计/方法论/方法这是一篇有例子的概念论文,它依赖于相关研究领域的先验见解,包括可持续发展目标、企业社会责任、创造共享价值、积极心理学、社会创业和社会创新。发现许多组织最近发起了可持续发展倡议,这些倡议通常侧重于提高效率,例如,在气候变化面前,通过减少电力消耗来降低碳排放,同时节省成本。然而,在未来的竞争中,仅仅避免核心业务的不可持续性,并可能在单独的社会责任项目中做好事是不够的。此外,对“速赢”效率提高的关注可能会限制许多公司所需要的更根本的转型。消费者,尤其是年轻一代,对企业为解决环境和社会挑战做出积极贡献的期望发生了巨大变化。与积极的心理相一致,这些市场转变需要从积极的角度做好核心业务。创意/价值积极可持续性的概念对创新、转型和沟通管理具有重要意义。即使是那些认为自己是领导者的公司,也很难意识到积极可持续发展带来的机遇。通过开发创新的解决方案、产品和服务,公司可以为环境和社会做出积极贡献。从中长期来看,这种积极影响往往会超过以效率为中心的项目的短期效益。大多数公司和领导者将别无选择,只能接受“净积极影响”,因为客户强烈希望公司在积极的可持续性方面采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Business Strategy
Journal of Business Strategy Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Strategy publishes articles with a practical focus designed to help readers develop successful business strategies. Articles should say something new or different and may propose a unique perspective. They should not offer prescriptions to CEOs on how to manage, but rather be directed toward middle and senior managers at companies of all sizes and types, as well as consultants and academics who want to think about their businesses in new ways. Coverage: As one of the few journals dedicated to business strategy, JBS defines strategy in the broadest sense and thus covers topics as diverse as marketing strategy, innovation, developments in the global economy, mergers & acquisition integration and human resources. We have a penchant for substantive, provocative and well-written articles. We also like to break the mould and include articles on topics readers are unlikely to find in other business publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信