Getting past the gatekeeper: Cultural competence, field access and researching gender-based violence – Evidence from four countries

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Paul Miller, Gillian Kirkman, Susan Timmins, Rukmini Banerjee, Anne Panicker, K. Nelson, Adele D Jones, E. Ochen
{"title":"Getting past the gatekeeper: Cultural competence, field access and researching gender-based violence – Evidence from four countries","authors":"Paul Miller, Gillian Kirkman, Susan Timmins, Rukmini Banerjee, Anne Panicker, K. Nelson, Adele D Jones, E. Ochen","doi":"10.1177/17577438221092274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Increasingly researchers are recognising the importance of including the perspectives of children and young people in research and in the development of interventions and innovations, in order to understand children's lives on their own terms. Purpose: This article reflects on the potential risks posed to children and young people in research and the role of gatekeepers in granting access and, in direct field activities, especially where the research could be deemed as ‘sensitive’. Research Design:Using a combined descriptive and autoethnographic research design, questionnaires and reflections were gathered from the field experiences of researchers in four countries (India, Jamaica, Uganda and the UK) conducting research on children's experiences of violence victimisation as part of a gender-based violence prevention project. Data was collected retrospectively and analysed thematically with the aid of QSR NVivo. Results: Based on the five themes that emerged: accessing schools; approach to access; accessing participants; lessons learnt; and advice for other researchers, the overall findings indicate that researching sensitive topics with children and young people is necessarily problematic in order to safeguard them. This is especially the case in contexts where discrimination and stigma relating to certain topics may be a significant barrier to children's participation. Conclusion: Research planning requires attention to gatekeeper power, safeguarding children and young people, and understanding how processes and attitudes concerning the status and rights of children at national and institutional levels might influence the research process.","PeriodicalId":37109,"journal":{"name":"Power and Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"204 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438221092274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Increasingly researchers are recognising the importance of including the perspectives of children and young people in research and in the development of interventions and innovations, in order to understand children's lives on their own terms. Purpose: This article reflects on the potential risks posed to children and young people in research and the role of gatekeepers in granting access and, in direct field activities, especially where the research could be deemed as ‘sensitive’. Research Design:Using a combined descriptive and autoethnographic research design, questionnaires and reflections were gathered from the field experiences of researchers in four countries (India, Jamaica, Uganda and the UK) conducting research on children's experiences of violence victimisation as part of a gender-based violence prevention project. Data was collected retrospectively and analysed thematically with the aid of QSR NVivo. Results: Based on the five themes that emerged: accessing schools; approach to access; accessing participants; lessons learnt; and advice for other researchers, the overall findings indicate that researching sensitive topics with children and young people is necessarily problematic in order to safeguard them. This is especially the case in contexts where discrimination and stigma relating to certain topics may be a significant barrier to children's participation. Conclusion: Research planning requires attention to gatekeeper power, safeguarding children and young people, and understanding how processes and attitudes concerning the status and rights of children at national and institutional levels might influence the research process.
越过守门人:文化能力、实地访问和研究基于性别的暴力——来自四个国家的证据
背景:越来越多的研究人员认识到在研究和干预和创新的发展中纳入儿童和年轻人的观点的重要性,以便根据儿童自己的条件了解他们的生活。目的:本文反映了研究中对儿童和年轻人构成的潜在风险,以及在授予访问权和直接实地活动中守门人的作用,特别是在研究可能被视为“敏感”的情况下。研究设计:采用描述性和自人种学相结合的研究设计,从四个国家(印度、牙买加、乌干达和英国)的研究人员的实地经验中收集问卷和反思,这些研究人员正在进行关于儿童遭受暴力侵害的经历的研究,作为基于性别的暴力预防项目的一部分。回顾性收集数据,并借助QSR NVivo进行主题分析。结果:根据出现的五个主题:进入学校;获取途径;访问参与者;经验教训;对其他研究人员的建议是,总体研究结果表明,为了保护儿童和年轻人,研究敏感话题必然是有问题的。在与某些主题有关的歧视和耻辱可能成为儿童参与的重大障碍的情况下,情况尤其如此。结论:研究规划需要注意看门人的权力,保护儿童和年轻人,并了解国家和机构层面有关儿童地位和权利的进程和态度可能如何影响研究进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Power and Education
Power and Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信