Social media, police excessive force and the limits of outrage: Evaluating models of police scandal

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Justin R. Ellis
{"title":"Social media, police excessive force and the limits of outrage: Evaluating models of police scandal","authors":"Justin R. Ellis","doi":"10.1177/17488958211017384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent criminological research has developed a processual conceptualisation of scandal to analyse policing and criminal justice transgression and its attempted management. Through media content analysis and in-depth interviews with police and non-police respondents, this article applies criminological theories of scandal to a case of bystander-filmed police excessive force at the 2013 Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras parade and uploaded to YouTube. The article renders scandal more complex than existing models, emphasising outrage and surprise in cases of bystander social media police scandals involving police excessive force, in conjunction with Mawby’s processual model. However, it argues that despite the mobilising force of outrage through social media, police capture of police complaint mechanisms and political opportunism can normalise police transgression and blur lines of responsibility. Individual transgressions can be linked to a macro, ‘chronic’ scandal of police excessive force, diminishing scandal’s conceptual and practical purchase as a police accountability lever.","PeriodicalId":47217,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/17488958211017384","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211017384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Recent criminological research has developed a processual conceptualisation of scandal to analyse policing and criminal justice transgression and its attempted management. Through media content analysis and in-depth interviews with police and non-police respondents, this article applies criminological theories of scandal to a case of bystander-filmed police excessive force at the 2013 Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras parade and uploaded to YouTube. The article renders scandal more complex than existing models, emphasising outrage and surprise in cases of bystander social media police scandals involving police excessive force, in conjunction with Mawby’s processual model. However, it argues that despite the mobilising force of outrage through social media, police capture of police complaint mechanisms and political opportunism can normalise police transgression and blur lines of responsibility. Individual transgressions can be linked to a macro, ‘chronic’ scandal of police excessive force, diminishing scandal’s conceptual and practical purchase as a police accountability lever.
社交媒体、警察过度使用武力和愤怒的限度:评估警察丑闻的模式
最近的犯罪学研究已经发展了丑闻的程序概念化,以分析警务和刑事司法的违法行为及其企图管理。本文通过媒体内容分析和对警察和非警察受访者的深度访谈,将丑闻的犯罪学理论应用于2013年悉尼同性恋狂欢节游行中旁观者拍摄的警察过度使用武力的案例,并上传至YouTube。这篇文章将丑闻渲染得比现有模型更为复杂,结合莫比的过程模型,强调了社交媒体上涉及警察过度使用武力的旁观者警察丑闻的愤怒和惊讶。然而,它认为,尽管通过社交媒体动员了愤怒的力量,但警察捕获警察投诉机制和政治机会主义可以使警察的违法行为正常化,并模糊责任界限。个人违规行为可能与警察过度使用武力的宏观“长期”丑闻有关,从而削弱了丑闻作为警察问责杠杆的概念和实际价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Criminology & Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信