The Role of Canon in the Study of Hinduism and Some Notes About Bourdieu: A Response to Stephen L. Young

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1163/15700682-12341482

J. Llewellyn

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This response to Stephen Young’s article begins with his use of the term doxa, drawn from Pierre Bourdieu. For Bourdieu doxa are the unspoken assumptions that undergird social hierarchy, assumptions that are only exposed during times of historical change. It is unclear if Young intends that the exposure of what he calls New Testament studies’ “protectionism” is a sign that the field has undergone such a change. The second part of the response is about the applicability of this kind of analysis to the study of Hinduism in North America, concluding that protectionism concerning the interpretation of the scriptural canon does not seem to be operative there. However, there is a more or less similar controversy about the study of Hinduism by outsiders.

查看原文本刊更多论文

正典在印度教研究中的作用及对布迪厄的一些注解——对斯蒂芬·l·杨的回应

对Stephen Young文章的回应始于他对doxa一词的使用，这个词来自Pierre Bourdieu。对于布迪厄来说，“公理”是那些隐含在社会等级基础上的假设，这些假设只有在历史变化时期才会暴露出来。尚不清楚杨是否有意将他所称的新约研究的“保护主义”暴露出来，这表明该领域已经发生了这样的变化。回应的第二部分是关于这种分析对北美印度教研究的适用性，结论是关于经典经典解释的保护主义在那里似乎并不起作用。然而，外界对印度教的研究或多或少也存在类似的争议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Method & Theory in the Study of Religion publishes articles, notes, book reviews and letters which explicitly address the problems of methodology and theory in the academic study of religion. This includes such traditional points of departure as history, philosophy, anthropology and sociology, but also the natural sciences, and such newer disciplinary approaches as feminist theory and studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion also concentrates on the critical analysis of theoretical problems prominent in the study of religion.