Breaking Out of Open-Plan: Extending Social Interference Theory Through an Evaluation of Contemporary Offices

IF 5.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Matthew C. Davis, D. Leach, Chris W. Clegg
{"title":"Breaking Out of Open-Plan: Extending Social Interference Theory Through an Evaluation of Contemporary Offices","authors":"Matthew C. Davis, D. Leach, Chris W. Clegg","doi":"10.1177/0013916519878211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Offices are evolving rapidly to facilitate organizational cost reductions and to better support contemporary working practices. We investigate relationships between the design of contemporary offices (physical proximity and breakout areas) and autonomy in predicting individual outcomes (ease of communication, job satisfaction, and well-being). We extend Social Interference Theory to include features of contemporary office design and explicitly explore the moderating role of autonomy. Working in differing office configurations of a global engineering company, 406 employees provided data. Access to breakout areas was strongly related to ease of communication, higher job satisfaction, and well-being. In the absence of breakout areas, employees with higher autonomy were able to better manage the challenges arising from contemporary offices. Practical implications include incorporating breakout areas to enhance employee experience within open-plan offices, using job design to optimize employee experience in open-plan offices, and manager and employee involvement in office design.","PeriodicalId":48374,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Behavior","volume":"52 1","pages":"945 - 978"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0013916519878211","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519878211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Offices are evolving rapidly to facilitate organizational cost reductions and to better support contemporary working practices. We investigate relationships between the design of contemporary offices (physical proximity and breakout areas) and autonomy in predicting individual outcomes (ease of communication, job satisfaction, and well-being). We extend Social Interference Theory to include features of contemporary office design and explicitly explore the moderating role of autonomy. Working in differing office configurations of a global engineering company, 406 employees provided data. Access to breakout areas was strongly related to ease of communication, higher job satisfaction, and well-being. In the absence of breakout areas, employees with higher autonomy were able to better manage the challenges arising from contemporary offices. Practical implications include incorporating breakout areas to enhance employee experience within open-plan offices, using job design to optimize employee experience in open-plan offices, and manager and employee involvement in office design.
突破开放式:从当代办公室的评价延伸社会干预理论
各办事处正在迅速发展,以促进组织成本的降低,并更好地支持当代工作实践。我们调查了当代办公室的设计(物理邻近和突破区域)与预测个人结果的自主性(沟通便利性、工作满意度和幸福感)之间的关系。我们将社会干扰理论扩展到包括当代办公室设计的特征,并明确探讨了自主性的调节作用。406名员工在一家全球工程公司的不同办公室配置中工作,提供了数据。进入突破区域与沟通的便利性、更高的工作满意度和幸福感密切相关。在没有突破区域的情况下,拥有更高自主权的员工能够更好地应对现代办公室带来的挑战。实际意义包括纳入突破领域以增强开放式办公室内的员工体验,使用职位设计优化开放式办公室中的员工体验以及经理和员工参与办公室设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Environment & Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal designed to report rigorous experimental and theoretical work focusing on the influence of the physical environment on human behavior at the individual, group, and institutional levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信