Minnesota Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Survey with Implications for Modelling of Infectious Disease Transmission and Control

Audrey M. Dorélien, A. B. Simon, Sarah L Hagge, K. Call, E. Enns, S. Kulasingam
{"title":"Minnesota Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Survey with Implications for Modelling of Infectious Disease Transmission and Control","authors":"Audrey M. Dorélien, A. B. Simon, Sarah L Hagge, K. Call, E. Enns, S. Kulasingam","doi":"10.29115/sp-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging infectious diseases, such as the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), pose a substantial challenge to United States (US) public health. In the absence of a vaccine, controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 depends on social distancing measures, such as school closures and stay-at-home orders. Infectious disease epidemiologists create models to test the effects of these different interventions and to predict their impact on different populations. One key input to these models is data on social contact and mixing patterns. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of this type of data for the US. The Minnesota Department of Health and University of Minnesota launched the Minnesota Social Contact Study (MN SCS) in order to capture social contact and mixing pattern data for MN as different social distancing measures are enacted. This report describes the MN SCS survey and survey methodology. We highlight key differences between the MN SCS and the most widely cited and used social contact survey based on data from eight European countries in 2006. We conclude by highlighting changes others may consider when adopting the survey for use in other populations. A copy of the survey instrument is included in the appendix.","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":"13 1","pages":"13669"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2020-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Emerging infectious diseases, such as the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), pose a substantial challenge to United States (US) public health. In the absence of a vaccine, controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 depends on social distancing measures, such as school closures and stay-at-home orders. Infectious disease epidemiologists create models to test the effects of these different interventions and to predict their impact on different populations. One key input to these models is data on social contact and mixing patterns. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of this type of data for the US. The Minnesota Department of Health and University of Minnesota launched the Minnesota Social Contact Study (MN SCS) in order to capture social contact and mixing pattern data for MN as different social distancing measures are enacted. This report describes the MN SCS survey and survey methodology. We highlight key differences between the MN SCS and the most widely cited and used social contact survey based on data from eight European countries in 2006. We conclude by highlighting changes others may consider when adopting the survey for use in other populations. A copy of the survey instrument is included in the appendix.
明尼苏达州社会接触和混合模式调查与传染病传播和控制模型的含义
2019年新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)等新出现的传染病对美国公共卫生构成了重大挑战。在没有疫苗的情况下,控制SARS-CoV-2的传播取决于社会距离措施,如学校关闭和居家令。传染病流行病学家创建模型来测试这些不同干预措施的效果,并预测它们对不同人群的影响。这些模型的一个关键输入是关于社会联系和混合模式的数据。不幸的是,美国缺乏这类数据。明尼苏达州卫生部和明尼苏达大学发起了明尼苏达州社会接触研究(MN SCS),以便在制定不同的社会距离措施时捕捉明尼苏达州的社会接触和混合模式数据。本报告描述了MN SCS调查和调查方法。我们强调了MN SCS与基于2006年八个欧洲国家数据的最广泛引用和使用的社会接触调查之间的主要差异。最后,我们强调了其他人在采用该调查用于其他人群时可能考虑的变化。调查文书的副本载于附录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信