Using systematic screening to identify students with academic and behavioral challenges for strategy instruction

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Preventing School Failure Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI:10.1080/1045988X.2022.2076643

R. Ennis, D. J. Royer, John L. Hosp

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Students with both academic and behavioral risk factors can benefit from participation in self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) instruction. Educators can use systematic screening procedures as part of effective data-informed decision making for identifying students who could benefit from SRSD. In this manuscript we detail screening procedures for both academic and behavioral risk factors to connect identified students with SRSD instruction. Recommendations for screening practices are provided including future directions for research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用系统筛选来识别在策略教学中存在学术和行为挑战的学生

摘要具有学术和行为风险因素的学生可以从参与自我调节策略发展（SRSD）教学中受益。教育工作者可以使用系统的筛查程序作为有效的数据知情决策的一部分，以确定哪些学生可以从SRSD中受益。在这份手稿中，我们详细介绍了学术和行为风险因素的筛选程序，以将已确定的学生与SRSD教学联系起来。提供了筛查实践的建议，包括未来的研究方向。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Preventing School Failure EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Preventing School Failure provides a forum in which to examine critically emerging and evidence-based practices that are both data driven and practical for children and youth in general and alternative education systems. Authors are afforded the opportunity to discuss and debate critical and sometimes controversial issues that affect the education of children and adolescents in various settings. Preventing School Failure is a peer-reviewed academic journal for administrators, educators, mental health workers, juvenile justice and corrections personnel, day and residential treatment personnel, staff-development specialists, teacher educators, and others. Our goal is to share authoritative and timely information with a wide-ranging audience dedicated to serving children and adolescents in general education, special education, and alternative education programs. We accept for review manuscripts that contain critical and integrated literature reviews, objective program evaluations, evidence-based strategies and procedures, program descriptions, and policy-related content. As appropriate, manuscripts should contain enough detail that readers are able to put useful or innovative strategies or procedures into practice.