Retrospective Evaluation of Patients with Angioedema Treated with C1 Inhibitors in an Emergency Department

IF 0.3 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
S. Yalçınlı, S. Kıyan, Funda Karbek Akarca
{"title":"Retrospective Evaluation of Patients with Angioedema Treated with C1 Inhibitors in an Emergency Department","authors":"S. Yalçınlı, S. Kıyan, Funda Karbek Akarca","doi":"10.4274/eajem.galenos.2020.82787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: We aimed first to investigate patients who received C1 inhibitor therapy in the ED. The patients’ complaints, examination findings, length of stay in the ED and whether the patients were treated with anything other than C1 inhibitor were investigated. Secondly, we aimed the response of patients who received C1 inhibitor therapy in the presence of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) -induced angioedema. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was designed. Patients who received C1 inhibitor therapy between January 2011 and February 2018 were reviewed using the hospital’s records on file. Results: Data were evaluated for 62 admissions in 23 different patients. The diagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) was present in 65.2% (n=15) of the patients, and 85.5% (n=53) of the admissions were related to acute HAE episodes. The main complaints of these patients were nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain and swelling of the face, lips, throat and extremities. It was determined that C1 inhibitor treatment was given to 8% (n=5) of admissions due to ACEI-induced angioedema. The complaints of these patients (5 admissions for 4 patients) were swelling of the tongue (n=3), lip (n=1) and face (n=1). Clinical improvement was observed in admission symptoms after treatment of C1 inhibitor in all patients with angioedema induced by HAE episodes or ACEIs. Conclusion: C1 inhibitor treatment is effective in treating acute HAE episodes. Although more evidence is needed for treatment of ACEI-induced angioedema attacks, C1 inhibitor therapy may be considered in patients who do not respond to classical treatment.","PeriodicalId":11814,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/eajem.galenos.2020.82787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We aimed first to investigate patients who received C1 inhibitor therapy in the ED. The patients’ complaints, examination findings, length of stay in the ED and whether the patients were treated with anything other than C1 inhibitor were investigated. Secondly, we aimed the response of patients who received C1 inhibitor therapy in the presence of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) -induced angioedema. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was designed. Patients who received C1 inhibitor therapy between January 2011 and February 2018 were reviewed using the hospital’s records on file. Results: Data were evaluated for 62 admissions in 23 different patients. The diagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) was present in 65.2% (n=15) of the patients, and 85.5% (n=53) of the admissions were related to acute HAE episodes. The main complaints of these patients were nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain and swelling of the face, lips, throat and extremities. It was determined that C1 inhibitor treatment was given to 8% (n=5) of admissions due to ACEI-induced angioedema. The complaints of these patients (5 admissions for 4 patients) were swelling of the tongue (n=3), lip (n=1) and face (n=1). Clinical improvement was observed in admission symptoms after treatment of C1 inhibitor in all patients with angioedema induced by HAE episodes or ACEIs. Conclusion: C1 inhibitor treatment is effective in treating acute HAE episodes. Although more evidence is needed for treatment of ACEI-induced angioedema attacks, C1 inhibitor therapy may be considered in patients who do not respond to classical treatment.
急诊科用C1抑制剂治疗血管性水肿患者的回顾性评价
目的:我们首先调查在ED接受C1抑制剂治疗的患者。调查患者的投诉、检查结果、在ED的停留时间以及患者是否接受了除C1抑制剂以外的任何药物治疗。其次,我们针对在血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)诱导的血管水肿存在的情况下接受C1抑制剂治疗的患者的反应。材料与方法:设计一项回顾性描述性研究。使用医院的档案记录对2011年1月至2018年2月期间接受C1抑制剂治疗的患者进行了审查。结果:对23名不同患者的62名入院患者的数据进行了评估。65.2%(n=15)的患者诊断为遗传性血管性水肿,85.5%(n=53)的入院患者与急性血管性水肿发作有关。这些患者的主要主诉是恶心、呕吐、腹痛和面部、嘴唇、喉咙和四肢肿胀。已确定,8%(n=5)的因ACEI诱导的血管性水肿入院患者接受了C1抑制剂治疗。这些患者的主诉(4名患者中有5名入院)是舌头肿胀(n=3)、嘴唇肿胀(n=1)和面部肿胀(n=1)。在所有由HAE发作或ACEI诱导的血管性水肿患者中,观察到C1抑制剂治疗后入院症状的临床改善。结论:C1抑制剂治疗急性HAE是有效的。尽管需要更多的证据来治疗ACEI诱导的血管性水肿发作,但对于对经典治疗没有反应的患者,可以考虑使用C1抑制剂治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信