Industriepolitik im Zeitalter künstlicher Intelligenz: Zur Renaissance interventionistischer Staatlichkeit

Philipp Staab, Dominik Piétron
{"title":"Industriepolitik im Zeitalter künstlicher Intelligenz: Zur Renaissance interventionistischer Staatlichkeit","authors":"Philipp Staab, Dominik Piétron","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.1.1033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, many governments have developed national strategies and investment programs to promote so-called artificial intelligence (AI). We read these programs as blueprints of specific techno-futures with a common goal: states reinvent themselves as initiators and managers of socio-technological change and are therefore developing more interventionist models in the context of industrial policy. In our text we analyse the specific modes of intervention and their normative backgrounds outlined in the AI initiatives of three countries – the United States, China and Germany. We observe convergence in a regulation model centred around what in political economy is called a Decentralized Development State which, however, is being developed within the framework of specific national path dependencies. We frame this as a functional connection between socio-technical visions of the future and attempts at political legitimation.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"13 1","pages":"23-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.1.1033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, many governments have developed national strategies and investment programs to promote so-called artificial intelligence (AI). We read these programs as blueprints of specific techno-futures with a common goal: states reinvent themselves as initiators and managers of socio-technological change and are therefore developing more interventionist models in the context of industrial policy. In our text we analyse the specific modes of intervention and their normative backgrounds outlined in the AI initiatives of three countries – the United States, China and Germany. We observe convergence in a regulation model centred around what in political economy is called a Decentralized Development State which, however, is being developed within the framework of specific national path dependencies. We frame this as a functional connection between socio-technical visions of the future and attempts at political legitimation.
人工智能时代的产业政策:干预主义国家的复兴
近年来,许多政府制定了国家战略和投资计划,以促进所谓的人工智能。我们将这些计划解读为特定技术未来的蓝图,并有一个共同的目标:各州将自己重塑为社会技术变革的发起者和管理者,因此在产业政策的背景下发展更多的干预主义模式。在我们的文本中,我们分析了美国、中国和德国三个国家的人工智能倡议中概述的具体干预模式及其规范背景。我们观察到,以政治经济学中所谓的去中心化发展国家为中心的监管模式趋同,然而,这种模式是在特定的国家路径依赖性框架内发展起来的。我们将其定义为未来社会技术愿景与政治合法化尝试之间的功能联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信