Reward-dependent dynamics and changes in risk taking in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
V. Sebri, S. Triberti, G. Granic, G. Pravettoni
{"title":"Reward-dependent dynamics and changes in risk taking in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task","authors":"V. Sebri, S. Triberti, G. Granic, G. Pravettoni","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2181065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) assesses real-world decision-making processes in a laboratory setting and has been applied to both healthy and clinical populations. Whereas many previous studies established reliable links between behaviour in the BART and individual characteristics, such as gender, age, and educational level, little is known to date how dynamic, contextual features of the BART impact risk taking behaviour. The present paper fills this gap and reports the results of an online BART administered to a sample of 141 voluntary participants. Taking a novel, single-trial perspective, we document significant associations between experience and expectation related variables, in particular reward and punishment dynamics, and risk-taking behaviour in the BART. Having accrued more money increases risk-taking behaviour as does experiencing foregone profits through exploded balloons. Our findings are consistent with prominent theories of decision-making under risk which postulate intra-person changes in risk-appetite. Our results have important implications for future research as they stress that a more dynamic perspective on the BART can enrich our understanding of the factors that shape risk-taking behaviour.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2181065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) assesses real-world decision-making processes in a laboratory setting and has been applied to both healthy and clinical populations. Whereas many previous studies established reliable links between behaviour in the BART and individual characteristics, such as gender, age, and educational level, little is known to date how dynamic, contextual features of the BART impact risk taking behaviour. The present paper fills this gap and reports the results of an online BART administered to a sample of 141 voluntary participants. Taking a novel, single-trial perspective, we document significant associations between experience and expectation related variables, in particular reward and punishment dynamics, and risk-taking behaviour in the BART. Having accrued more money increases risk-taking behaviour as does experiencing foregone profits through exploded balloons. Our findings are consistent with prominent theories of decision-making under risk which postulate intra-person changes in risk-appetite. Our results have important implications for future research as they stress that a more dynamic perspective on the BART can enrich our understanding of the factors that shape risk-taking behaviour.
气球模拟风险任务中的奖励依赖动态和风险承担的变化
气球模拟风险任务(BART)在实验室环境中评估现实世界的决策过程,并已应用于健康和临床人群。尽管许多先前的研究在旧金山湾区的行为与个人特征(如性别、年龄和教育水平)之间建立了可靠的联系,但迄今为止,人们对旧金山湾区的动态、情境特征如何影响冒险行为知之甚少。本文填补了这一空白,并报告了对141名自愿参与者进行的在线BART管理的结果。采用新颖的单次试验视角,我们记录了经验和期望相关变量(特别是奖惩动态)与BART中的冒险行为之间的显著关联。积累更多的钱会增加冒险行为,通过爆炸气球体验放弃的利润也是如此。我们的发现与著名的风险决策理论是一致的,这些理论假设了个人内部风险偏好的变化。我们的研究结果对未来的研究具有重要意义,因为它们强调了BART更动态的视角可以丰富我们对塑造冒险行为因素的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Journal of Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信