Disinformation as a Contemporary Key Security Challenge in the Context of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Dávid Kollár
{"title":"Disinformation as a Contemporary Key Security Challenge in the Context of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict","authors":"Dávid Kollár","doi":"10.24040/politickevedy.2022.25.3.87-109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"False information, as well as the actors who spread it, have the power to promote negative narratives about society and discredit the work of serious media, non-governmental organizations, etc. Concerns are growing around the world that international NGOs and civil society organizations are vulnerable to online attacks and disinformation campaigns. These attacks are aimed at instilling fear and confusion, stigmatizing civil society, disparaging targeted organizations and their leaders, or promoting inaccurate views. The deliberately misleading nature of false information can make it difficult to study and analyze this issue. After studying the available professional sources, we can state that most of the studies carried out so far focus on three aspects, namely (1) identification of forms of false information and false content, (2) causes and dynamics of their spread, especially on social networks, and (3) impact to public opinion. An objective of this article was to characterize and clarify all three aspects, while we have tried to apply them to a specific case in the second part of the paper, specifically Russian-Ukrainian war. The main cause, or the motive of the primary creators of disinformation is to cause chaos in society and undermine trust in the state, which is directly related to inciting hatred and distrust towards state institutions. Disinformation has become a hybrid tool as a form of attack on the interests of every democratic state and the security of its citizens. Foreign powers often try to spread their narratives through their own or friendly media, or fictitiously independent activists, while they often communicate differently internally within their own state. Based on our findings, coordination with three key players is crucial in the fight against disinformation: technology companies, civil society and fact-checkers and academic institutions. In addition, strategic communication is one of the key tools in the fight against disinformation and requires a broad approach. Disinformation campaigns are often not limited to spreading fake news, but often focus on building a damaging narrative. This implies a close relationship between the fight against disinformation and strategic communication, public diplomacy and digital communication.","PeriodicalId":42158,"journal":{"name":"Politicke Vedy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politicke Vedy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2022.25.3.87-109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

False information, as well as the actors who spread it, have the power to promote negative narratives about society and discredit the work of serious media, non-governmental organizations, etc. Concerns are growing around the world that international NGOs and civil society organizations are vulnerable to online attacks and disinformation campaigns. These attacks are aimed at instilling fear and confusion, stigmatizing civil society, disparaging targeted organizations and their leaders, or promoting inaccurate views. The deliberately misleading nature of false information can make it difficult to study and analyze this issue. After studying the available professional sources, we can state that most of the studies carried out so far focus on three aspects, namely (1) identification of forms of false information and false content, (2) causes and dynamics of their spread, especially on social networks, and (3) impact to public opinion. An objective of this article was to characterize and clarify all three aspects, while we have tried to apply them to a specific case in the second part of the paper, specifically Russian-Ukrainian war. The main cause, or the motive of the primary creators of disinformation is to cause chaos in society and undermine trust in the state, which is directly related to inciting hatred and distrust towards state institutions. Disinformation has become a hybrid tool as a form of attack on the interests of every democratic state and the security of its citizens. Foreign powers often try to spread their narratives through their own or friendly media, or fictitiously independent activists, while they often communicate differently internally within their own state. Based on our findings, coordination with three key players is crucial in the fight against disinformation: technology companies, civil society and fact-checkers and academic institutions. In addition, strategic communication is one of the key tools in the fight against disinformation and requires a broad approach. Disinformation campaigns are often not limited to spreading fake news, but often focus on building a damaging narrative. This implies a close relationship between the fight against disinformation and strategic communication, public diplomacy and digital communication.
在俄乌冲突背景下,虚假信息是当代主要的安全挑战
虚假信息以及传播虚假信息的行为者有能力促进对社会的负面叙述,并使严肃媒体、非政府组织等的工作失去信誉。世界各地越来越担心,国际非政府组织和民间社会组织容易受到网络攻击和虚假信息运动的影响。这些攻击的目的是灌输恐惧和混乱,污名化民间社会,贬低目标组织及其领导人,或宣传不准确的观点。虚假信息的故意误导性质使得研究和分析这个问题变得困难。在研究了现有的专业资料后,我们可以说,迄今为止进行的大多数研究都集中在三个方面,即(1)对虚假信息和虚假内容形式的识别,(2)虚假信息和虚假内容传播的原因和动态,特别是在社交网络上的传播,以及(3)对公众舆论的影响。本文的目的是描述和澄清这三个方面,而我们试图将它们应用于论文第二部分的具体案例,特别是俄罗斯-乌克兰战争。虚假信息的主要制造者的主要原因或动机是造成社会混乱,破坏对国家的信任,这与煽动对国家机构的仇恨和不信任直接相关。虚假信息已经成为一种混合工具,成为攻击每个民主国家利益及其公民安全的一种形式。外国势力往往试图通过自己的或友好的媒体,或虚构的独立活动人士来传播他们的叙事,而他们在自己的国家内部往往以不同的方式进行沟通。根据我们的调查结果,在打击虚假信息的斗争中,与三个关键参与者的协调至关重要:科技公司、公民社会、事实核查者和学术机构。此外,战略沟通是打击虚假信息的关键工具之一,需要广泛的方法。造谣活动往往不局限于传播假新闻,而是往往专注于建立一种破坏性的叙事。这意味着打击虚假信息与战略传播、公共外交和数字传播之间存在密切关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Politicke Vedy
Politicke Vedy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信