Comparison of Two Enzyme Immunoassays and Four Lysate Antigens for the Detection of Antibody in Canine Blastomycosis

M. Day, Arin C Esterbrook, Ignatius Bisharat, Abdullah Saleh Albqomi, Bryn C. Kennell, Russ Manteca, Heaton Oakes, Geoffrey M. Scalarone, G. Scalarone
{"title":"Comparison of Two Enzyme Immunoassays and Four Lysate Antigens for the Detection of Antibody in Canine Blastomycosis","authors":"M. Day, Arin C Esterbrook, Ignatius Bisharat, Abdullah Saleh Albqomi, Bryn C. Kennell, Russ Manteca, Heaton Oakes, Geoffrey M. Scalarone, G. Scalarone","doi":"10.4236/OJVM.2021.114009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blastomycosis, \nthe systemic fungal disease of humans and animals caused by Blastomyces \ndermatitidis and the cryptic species Blastomyces gilchristii, is often misdiagnosed as a \nbacterial or viral pulmonary disease. Therefore, the development of improved \nimmunodiagnostic assays for this disease has been the primary focus of research \nin our laboratory. The present study was designed to evaluate four Blastomyces yeast-phase lysate \nantigenic preparations (human, 597, Eagle River, WI; dog, ERC-2, WI; Human, \nB5927, Mountain Iron, MN; soil, 85, Georgia, ATCC 56920) for their ability to \ndetect antibody in 48 serum specimens from dogs with diagnosed blastomycosis \nusing an indirect ELISA (STD) compared to a biotin-streptavidin ELISA (B-SA). \nAll four lysate antigens were able to detect antibodies in the specimens with mean absorbance values \nranging from 0.930 (B5927) to 1.142 (ERC-2) with the STD ELSA and from 1.395 \n(B5927) to 1.775 (85) with the B-SA ELISA. The results indicated that both \nELISA methods could be utilized for antibody detection, but the B-SA ELISA \nexhibited greater sensitivity than the STD ELISA with all four of the lysates.","PeriodicalId":61886,"journal":{"name":"兽医学(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"兽医学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJVM.2021.114009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blastomycosis, the systemic fungal disease of humans and animals caused by Blastomyces dermatitidis and the cryptic species Blastomyces gilchristii, is often misdiagnosed as a bacterial or viral pulmonary disease. Therefore, the development of improved immunodiagnostic assays for this disease has been the primary focus of research in our laboratory. The present study was designed to evaluate four Blastomyces yeast-phase lysate antigenic preparations (human, 597, Eagle River, WI; dog, ERC-2, WI; Human, B5927, Mountain Iron, MN; soil, 85, Georgia, ATCC 56920) for their ability to detect antibody in 48 serum specimens from dogs with diagnosed blastomycosis using an indirect ELISA (STD) compared to a biotin-streptavidin ELISA (B-SA). All four lysate antigens were able to detect antibodies in the specimens with mean absorbance values ranging from 0.930 (B5927) to 1.142 (ERC-2) with the STD ELSA and from 1.395 (B5927) to 1.775 (85) with the B-SA ELISA. The results indicated that both ELISA methods could be utilized for antibody detection, but the B-SA ELISA exhibited greater sensitivity than the STD ELISA with all four of the lysates.
两种酶免疫法和四种裂解抗原检测犬胚菌病抗体的比较
芽生菌病是由皮氏芽生菌和隐种吉尔克里斯蒂芽生菌引起的人类和动物的系统性真菌病,经常被误诊为细菌或病毒性肺部疾病。因此,开发改进的免疫诊断方法一直是我们实验室的主要研究重点。本研究旨在评估四种芽孢酵母相裂解物抗原制剂(人,597,威斯康星州鹰河;狗,ERC-2,威斯康星州;人,B5927,明尼苏达州Mountain Iron;土壤,85,乔治亚州,ATCC 56920)使用间接ELISA(STD)与生物素-链霉亲和素ELISA(B-SA)相比,在48份诊断为芽孢菌病的狗血清样本中检测抗体的能力。所有四种裂解物抗原都能够用STD ELSA检测样本中的抗体,其平均吸光度值范围为0.930(B5927)至1.142(ERC-2),用B-SA ELISA检测样本中抗体的平均吸光度值为1.395(B592七)至1.775(85)。结果表明,两种ELISA方法都可以用于抗体检测,但B-SA ELISA对所有四种裂解物的敏感性都高于STD ELISA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
244
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信