Using Video and Multimodal Classroom Interaction Analysis to Investigate How Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation Influence Pedagogy

Q3 Social Sciences
J. Riordan, L. Revell, B. Bowie, C. Thomas, M. Woolley, S. Hulbert
{"title":"Using Video and Multimodal Classroom Interaction Analysis to Investigate How Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation Influence Pedagogy","authors":"J. Riordan, L. Revell, B. Bowie, C. Thomas, M. Woolley, S. Hulbert","doi":"10.1163/23644583-bja10040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMisinformation is accidentally wrong and disinformation is deliberately incorrect (i.e., deception). This article uses the Pedagogy Analysis Framework (paf) to investigate how information, misinformation, and disinformation influence classroom pedagogy. 95 people participated (i.e., one lesson with 7-year-olds, another with 10-year-olds, and three with a class of 13-year-olds). The authors used four video-based methods (lesson video analysis, teacher verbal protocols, pupil group verbal protocols, and teacher interviews). 35 hours of video data (recorded 2013–2020) were analysed using Grounded Theory Methods by the researchers, the class teachers, and groups of pupils (three girls and three boys). The methodology was Straussian Grounded Theory. The authors present how often participants used information, misinformation, and disinformation. They illustrate how the paf helps understand and explain information, misinformation, and disinformation in the classroom by analysing video data transcripts. In addition, the authors discuss participant perceptions of the status of information; overlapping information, misinformation, and disinformation; and information communication difficulties.","PeriodicalId":31797,"journal":{"name":"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23644583-bja10040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Misinformation is accidentally wrong and disinformation is deliberately incorrect (i.e., deception). This article uses the Pedagogy Analysis Framework (paf) to investigate how information, misinformation, and disinformation influence classroom pedagogy. 95 people participated (i.e., one lesson with 7-year-olds, another with 10-year-olds, and three with a class of 13-year-olds). The authors used four video-based methods (lesson video analysis, teacher verbal protocols, pupil group verbal protocols, and teacher interviews). 35 hours of video data (recorded 2013–2020) were analysed using Grounded Theory Methods by the researchers, the class teachers, and groups of pupils (three girls and three boys). The methodology was Straussian Grounded Theory. The authors present how often participants used information, misinformation, and disinformation. They illustrate how the paf helps understand and explain information, misinformation, and disinformation in the classroom by analysing video data transcripts. In addition, the authors discuss participant perceptions of the status of information; overlapping information, misinformation, and disinformation; and information communication difficulties.
利用视频和多模式课堂互动分析研究信息、错误信息和虚假信息对教育学的影响
虚假信息是偶然错误的,虚假信息是故意错误的(即欺骗)。本文使用教育学分析框架(paf)来研究信息、错误信息和虚假信息如何影响课堂教学。95人参加了(即,一节课针对7岁儿童,另一节课面向10岁儿童,三节课针对13岁儿童)。作者使用了四种基于视频的方法(课堂视频分析、教师言语协议、学生小组言语协议和教师访谈)。研究人员、班主任和学生组(三名女孩和三名男孩)使用基础理论方法分析了35小时的视频数据(记录于2013-2020年)。方法论是斯特劳斯基础理论。作者介绍了参与者使用信息、错误信息和虚假信息的频率。他们展示了paf如何通过分析视频数据记录来帮助理解和解释课堂上的信息、错误信息和虚假信息。此外,作者还讨论了参与者对信息状况的看法;重叠信息、错误信息和虚假信息;以及信息交流困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy
Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信