N. Bashmakova, Irina G. Polyakova, E. Symaniuk, A. Khramtsova
{"title":"Legal regulation of gamete and embryo donation: global and national trends (literature review)","authors":"N. Bashmakova, Irina G. Polyakova, E. Symaniuk, A. Khramtsova","doi":"10.47470/0044-197x-2023-67-3-252-258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the assisted reproductive technologies have been available for several decades, there still exists a great divergence in legal frameworks regulating reproductive donation. \nThe article discusses legal regulations on embryo and gamete (sperm and oocytes) donation in Europe, Americas, Canada and Australia. The search for publications was carried out in all available bibliographic and abstract databases (RSCI, Scopus, Web of Science, CyberLeninka, eLibrary, PubMed) containing reports on the subject of the article. The main search restrictions were the language of publications (English and Russian) and the date of reports (not earlier than 2000). We seek to chart global trends and identify major legislative “gaps”; the latter emerge because each type of reproductive donation causes specific conflicts and calls for specific regulations. There is a visible trend towards open gamete donation across the globe as more and more governments insist on deanonymization of donors. Legislators intend to protect children’s interests and to secure their right to identify their biological parents. Financial remuneration is perceived differently, and regulations diverge across the globe. Many governments permit reimbursements, but do not allow any commercial payoffs. Yet, issues of parenthood and donor-recipient obligations remain quite controversial, which results in divergent legal frameworks. Sperm donation is the least controversial and safest procedure; therefore, it is legal in all countries and is allowed in non-medical setting. On the other hand, informal sperm donation requires targeted legal regulations. Parenthood and anonymity in sperm donation also cause concern and require specific legislation. In some countries, oocyte donation is illegal while in others it is under severe limitations. Currently medical treatment and observation of oocyte donors after ART cycles is not yet legally regulated, which leaves women unprotected from post-donation health issues. Embryo donation hinges on the status of the embryo. Specific definition will determine the consequences including from adoption to research use. There remains a problem of authority over embryo’s future in cases of a spouse’s death or divorce.","PeriodicalId":39241,"journal":{"name":"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197x-2023-67-3-252-258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While the assisted reproductive technologies have been available for several decades, there still exists a great divergence in legal frameworks regulating reproductive donation.
The article discusses legal regulations on embryo and gamete (sperm and oocytes) donation in Europe, Americas, Canada and Australia. The search for publications was carried out in all available bibliographic and abstract databases (RSCI, Scopus, Web of Science, CyberLeninka, eLibrary, PubMed) containing reports on the subject of the article. The main search restrictions were the language of publications (English and Russian) and the date of reports (not earlier than 2000). We seek to chart global trends and identify major legislative “gaps”; the latter emerge because each type of reproductive donation causes specific conflicts and calls for specific regulations. There is a visible trend towards open gamete donation across the globe as more and more governments insist on deanonymization of donors. Legislators intend to protect children’s interests and to secure their right to identify their biological parents. Financial remuneration is perceived differently, and regulations diverge across the globe. Many governments permit reimbursements, but do not allow any commercial payoffs. Yet, issues of parenthood and donor-recipient obligations remain quite controversial, which results in divergent legal frameworks. Sperm donation is the least controversial and safest procedure; therefore, it is legal in all countries and is allowed in non-medical setting. On the other hand, informal sperm donation requires targeted legal regulations. Parenthood and anonymity in sperm donation also cause concern and require specific legislation. In some countries, oocyte donation is illegal while in others it is under severe limitations. Currently medical treatment and observation of oocyte donors after ART cycles is not yet legally regulated, which leaves women unprotected from post-donation health issues. Embryo donation hinges on the status of the embryo. Specific definition will determine the consequences including from adoption to research use. There remains a problem of authority over embryo’s future in cases of a spouse’s death or divorce.
虽然辅助生殖技术已经存在了几十年,但在规范生殖捐赠的法律框架方面仍然存在很大分歧。本文讨论了欧洲、美洲、加拿大和澳大利亚对胚胎和配子(精子和卵母细胞)捐赠的法律规定。在所有可用的包含文章主题报告的书目和摘要数据库(RSCI, Scopus, Web of Science, CyberLeninka, library, PubMed)中进行出版物搜索。主要的检索限制是出版物的语言(英文和俄文)和报告的日期(不早于2000年)。我们力图描绘全球趋势,找出主要的立法“缺口”;后者的出现是因为每种类型的生殖捐赠都会引起特定的冲突,需要特定的规定。随着越来越多的政府坚持对捐赠者进行去匿名化,全球范围内公开配子捐赠的趋势明显。立法者打算保护儿童的利益,并确保他们确定亲生父母的权利。人们对财务报酬的看法不同,全球各地的监管也不尽相同。许多政府允许报销,但不允许任何商业报酬。然而,亲子关系和捐助者-受援国义务的问题仍然有很大争议,导致法律框架不同。捐献精子是争议最小、最安全的程序;因此,它在所有国家都是合法的,并且在非医疗环境中是允许的。另一方面,非正式的精子捐赠需要有针对性的法律法规。捐赠精子的父母身份和匿名性也引起了关注,需要专门的立法。在一些国家,捐赠卵子是非法的,而在另一些国家则受到严格的限制。目前,在抗逆转录病毒治疗周期后对卵子捐献者的医疗和观察尚未得到法律规范,这使得妇女在捐赠后的健康问题上得不到保护。胚胎捐赠取决于胚胎的状态。具体的定义将决定从采用到研究使用的后果。在配偶死亡或离婚的情况下,胚胎未来的权力仍然存在问题。