Chemoradiotherapy alone or in combination with Endostar for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Q4 Health Professions
Zhen-chao Tao, J. Qiu, Yangyang Zhang, L. Qian, Jing Gao, Yan Zhou, Liping Yang, Jian He, Jing Yang, Rui Wang, Yifan Huang, Lingran Zhou, Bin Sun, Y. Cui
{"title":"Chemoradiotherapy alone or in combination with Endostar for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Zhen-chao Tao, J. Qiu, Yangyang Zhang, L. Qian, Jing Gao, Yan Zhou, Liping Yang, Jian He, Jing Yang, Rui Wang, Yifan Huang, Lingran Zhou, Bin Sun, Y. Cui","doi":"10.29252/IJRR.19.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies show inconsistent effect estimates for the efficacy of Endostar in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety on the basis of data obtained from available randomized controlled trials (RTCs). We find relevant articles reporting the use of Endostar combined with chemoradiotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The retrieval period was from June 2008 to June 2018. A total of 11 RTCs that recruited a total of 735 patients were included. Overall, the results indicated that patients who received Endostar plus chemoradiotherapy showed a significantly increased incidence of objective response rate (ORR) (relative risk [RR] = 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31–1.67; P < 0.00001) and disease control rate (DCR) (RR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.09–1.25; P < 0.00001) compared with those who received chemoradiotherapy alone. However, no significant difference was noted between groups for 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.91–1.23; P = 0.48). Furthermore, combined Endostar with chemoradiotherapy did not yield a high incidence of stable and elevated Karnofsky performance score (RR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.91–1.23; P = 0.48). Moreover, no significant difference was noted in the incidence of total toxicity between the two groups. The findings of our study indicated that treatment with Endostar plus chemoradiotherapy yielded a high incidence of ORR or DCR, but did not trigger excess adverse events in patients with NSCLC.","PeriodicalId":14498,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiation Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/IJRR.19.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies show inconsistent effect estimates for the efficacy of Endostar in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety on the basis of data obtained from available randomized controlled trials (RTCs). We find relevant articles reporting the use of Endostar combined with chemoradiotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The retrieval period was from June 2008 to June 2018. A total of 11 RTCs that recruited a total of 735 patients were included. Overall, the results indicated that patients who received Endostar plus chemoradiotherapy showed a significantly increased incidence of objective response rate (ORR) (relative risk [RR] = 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31–1.67; P < 0.00001) and disease control rate (DCR) (RR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.09–1.25; P < 0.00001) compared with those who received chemoradiotherapy alone. However, no significant difference was noted between groups for 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.91–1.23; P = 0.48). Furthermore, combined Endostar with chemoradiotherapy did not yield a high incidence of stable and elevated Karnofsky performance score (RR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.91–1.23; P = 0.48). Moreover, no significant difference was noted in the incidence of total toxicity between the two groups. The findings of our study indicated that treatment with Endostar plus chemoradiotherapy yielded a high incidence of ORR or DCR, but did not trigger excess adverse events in patients with NSCLC.
化疗单独或联合恩度治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌:系统回顾和荟萃分析
先前的研究表明,Endostar对接受放化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌癌症患者的疗效估计不一致。因此,本荟萃分析旨在根据从现有随机对照试验(RTCs)中获得的数据来确定有效性和安全性。我们发现相关文章报道Endostar联合放化疗方案治疗晚期NSCLC。检索期为2008年6月至2018年6月。共纳入11个RTC,共招募735名患者。总的来说,结果表明,与单独接受放化疗的患者相比,接受Endostar加放化疗的病人的客观有效率(ORR)(相对风险[RR]=1.48;95%置信区间[CI]=1.31-1.67;P<0.00001)和疾病控制率(DCR)(RR=1.17;95%可信区间=1.09-1.25;P<0.0001)的发生率显著增加。然而,两组之间的1年生存率没有显著差异(RR=1.06;95%CI=0.91-1.23;P=0.48)。此外,Endostar与放化疗联合使用不会产生稳定和升高的Karnofsky表现评分的高发生率(RR=1.06,95%CI=0.91-1.23;P=0.48%)。此外,两组的总毒性发生率没有显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,Endostar加放化疗治疗导致ORR或DCR的高发病率,但不会在NSCLC患者中引发过量的不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Radiation Research
Iranian Journal of Radiation Research RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.67
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Radiation Research (IJRR) publishes original scientific research and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, and Medical and health physics. The clinical studies submitted for publication include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, especially chemoradiotherapy approaches, and relevant innovations in hyperthermia, brachytherapy, high LET irradiation, nuclear medicine, dosimetry, tumor imaging, radiation treatment planning, radiosensitizers, and radioprotectors. All manuscripts must pass stringent peer-review and only papers that are rated of high scientific quality are accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信