“It doesn’t get taken seriously until it gets bad”: experiences of risk management from people diagnosed with a borderline personality disorder

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Andrew Ware, A. Preston, S. Draycott
{"title":"“It doesn’t get taken seriously until it gets bad”: experiences of risk management from people diagnosed with a borderline personality disorder","authors":"Andrew Ware, A. Preston, S. Draycott","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-02-2021-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nPeople with a borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis can require support from mental health services for managing risk behaviour. Current routine inpatient and community treatment can be unhelpful for this group. Positive risk taking has been developed to help community teams manage risk with people with a BPD. This study aims to explore experiences of risk management in an NHS Trust where positive risk taking is being implemented with people with a BPD.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nInterpretative phenomenological analysis is the methodology of transcripts from semi-structured interviews. Nine adults with a diagnosis of BPD and current or previous experiences of risk management approaches were sampled from one NHS Trust.\n\n\nFindings\nLimited resources and interpersonal barriers had a negative impact on experiences of Positive risk taking. Participants experienced one-off risk assessments and short-term interventions such as medication which they described as “meaningless”. Traumatic experiences could make it difficult to establish therapeutic relationships and elicit unhelpful responses from professionals. Participants could only feel “taken seriously” when in crisis which contributed towards an increase in risky behaviour. Positive risk taking was contingent upon collaborative and consistent professional relationships which created a “safety net”, enabling open communication and responsibility taking which challenged recovery-relapse patterns of service use.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nPositive risk taking approaches to risk management may benefit people with a BPD. Findings complement those from other studies emphasising the importance of compassion and empathy when working with personality disorder. Training and increased resources are required to implement effective risk management with this group.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFindings expand upon the sparse existing research in the area of risk management using the Positive risk taking approach with people with a BPD diagnosis, and provide idiographic understanding which is clinically meaningful. Participants’ experiences suggest Positive risk taking may provide a framework for improving quality of life and decreasing service use for people diagnosed with BPD engaging in risk management with Community Mental Health Teams, which facilitates recovery and other benefits.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-02-2021-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose People with a borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis can require support from mental health services for managing risk behaviour. Current routine inpatient and community treatment can be unhelpful for this group. Positive risk taking has been developed to help community teams manage risk with people with a BPD. This study aims to explore experiences of risk management in an NHS Trust where positive risk taking is being implemented with people with a BPD. Design/methodology/approach Interpretative phenomenological analysis is the methodology of transcripts from semi-structured interviews. Nine adults with a diagnosis of BPD and current or previous experiences of risk management approaches were sampled from one NHS Trust. Findings Limited resources and interpersonal barriers had a negative impact on experiences of Positive risk taking. Participants experienced one-off risk assessments and short-term interventions such as medication which they described as “meaningless”. Traumatic experiences could make it difficult to establish therapeutic relationships and elicit unhelpful responses from professionals. Participants could only feel “taken seriously” when in crisis which contributed towards an increase in risky behaviour. Positive risk taking was contingent upon collaborative and consistent professional relationships which created a “safety net”, enabling open communication and responsibility taking which challenged recovery-relapse patterns of service use. Research limitations/implications Positive risk taking approaches to risk management may benefit people with a BPD. Findings complement those from other studies emphasising the importance of compassion and empathy when working with personality disorder. Training and increased resources are required to implement effective risk management with this group. Originality/value Findings expand upon the sparse existing research in the area of risk management using the Positive risk taking approach with people with a BPD diagnosis, and provide idiographic understanding which is clinically meaningful. Participants’ experiences suggest Positive risk taking may provide a framework for improving quality of life and decreasing service use for people diagnosed with BPD engaging in risk management with Community Mental Health Teams, which facilitates recovery and other benefits.
“直到事情变得糟糕,人们才会认真对待”:边缘型人格障碍患者的风险管理经验
目的被诊断为边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的人可能需要心理健康服务部门的支持来管理风险行为。目前的常规住院治疗和社区治疗对这一群体可能没有帮助。已经制定了积极的风险承担,以帮助社区团队与BPD患者一起管理风险。本研究旨在探索英国国家医疗服务体系信托基金的风险管理经验,该基金正在对BPD患者实施积极的风险承担。设计/方法论/方法论解释性现象学分析是半结构化访谈的记录方法论。从一家NHS信托基金会抽取了9名诊断为BPD且目前或以前有风险管理方法经验的成年人。发现有限的资源和人际障碍对积极冒险的体验产生了负面影响。参与者经历了一次性风险评估和短期干预,如药物治疗,他们称其“毫无意义”。创伤经历可能会使建立治疗关系变得困难,并引发专业人士的无益反应。参与者只有在危机中才会感到“被认真对待”,这导致了风险行为的增加。积极的风险承担取决于合作和一致的专业关系,这创造了一个“安全网”,实现了开放的沟通和责任承担,挑战了服务使用的恢复-复发模式。研究局限性/含义积极的风险管理方法可能使BPD患者受益。研究结果补充了其他研究的结果,这些研究强调了在处理人格障碍时同情和同理心的重要性。需要培训和增加资源,以便与该小组一起实施有效的风险管理。原创性/价值研究结果扩展了风险管理领域现有的稀疏研究,对诊断为BPD的人使用积极风险承担方法,并提供了具有临床意义的具体理解。参与者的经验表明,积极的风险承担可以为社区心理健康团队参与风险管理的BPD诊断患者提供一个提高生活质量和减少服务使用的框架,这有助于康复和其他好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信