Tax Software versus Paid Preparers: Motivations and Predictors for the Mode of Tax Preparation Assistance

IF 2.2 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
L. Rosenthal, Bonnie Brown, J. Higgs, T. Rupert
{"title":"Tax Software versus Paid Preparers: Motivations and Predictors for the Mode of Tax Preparation Assistance","authors":"L. Rosenthal, Bonnie Brown, J. Higgs, T. Rupert","doi":"10.2308/horizons-2020-083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the number of taxpayers using tax preparation software has increased substantially; however, little is known about how these taxpayers differ from those using a paid professional. We gather data from a sample of taxpayers who used either tax software or a paid professional to examine their motivations for choosing their mode of tax preparation assistance. We find software users rated the importance of preparing the most accurate return significantly lower than the paid professional groups, while they rated the goal of minimizing the cost of preparation significantly higher in importance. We draw upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model to examine variables that predict the mode of tax preparation assistance. Results suggest measures representing performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence are significant in distinguishing taxpayers using tax software from those using a paid preparer.","PeriodicalId":51419,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Horizons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2020-083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years, the number of taxpayers using tax preparation software has increased substantially; however, little is known about how these taxpayers differ from those using a paid professional. We gather data from a sample of taxpayers who used either tax software or a paid professional to examine their motivations for choosing their mode of tax preparation assistance. We find software users rated the importance of preparing the most accurate return significantly lower than the paid professional groups, while they rated the goal of minimizing the cost of preparation significantly higher in importance. We draw upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model to examine variables that predict the mode of tax preparation assistance. Results suggest measures representing performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence are significant in distinguishing taxpayers using tax software from those using a paid preparer.
税务软件与付费编制:动机和预测模式的税务准备援助
近年来,纳税人使用报税软件的人数大幅增加;然而,很少有人知道这些纳税人与那些使用付费专业人士的纳税人有什么不同。我们从使用税务软件或付费专业人员的纳税人样本中收集数据,以检查他们选择税务准备协助模式的动机。我们发现软件用户认为准备最准确回报的重要性显著低于付费专业群体,而他们认为最小化准备成本的目标显著高于重要性。我们借鉴了统一理论的接受和使用的技术模型来检查变量预测模式的税务准备援助。结果表明,代表绩效预期、努力预期和社会影响的措施在区分使用税务软件的纳税人与使用付费编制人员的纳税人方面具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting Horizons
Accounting Horizons BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Accounting Horizons is one of three association-wide journals published by the American Accounting Association AAA. This journal seeks to bridge academic and professional audiences with articles that focus on accounting, broadly defined, and that provide insights pertinent to the accounting profession. The contents of Accounting Horizons, therefore, should interest researchers, educators, practitioners, regulators, and students of accounting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信