Event-related brain potentials study of arithmetic fact retrieval in children with different math achievement levels

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
F. R. Gómez-Velázquez, A. González-Garrido, Vanessa D. Ruiz-Stovel, Erwin Villuendas-González, Alicia Martínez-Ramos, Minerva Altamirano-Ríos
{"title":"Event-related brain potentials study of arithmetic fact retrieval in children with different math achievement levels","authors":"F. R. Gómez-Velázquez, A. González-Garrido, Vanessa D. Ruiz-Stovel, Erwin Villuendas-González, Alicia Martínez-Ramos, Minerva Altamirano-Ríos","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2022.2090571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fact retrieval deficits have been documented in children with mathematical learning disabilities. We assessed the retrieval of arithmetic facts in neurotypical 9-to-10-year-old children with different mathematical achievement levels using event-related potential methods while performing an arithmetic verification task (addition, subtraction, and multiplication). Forty-eight participants were divided into High (H), Average (A), and Low (L) mathematics performance according to their scores on The Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4). Children determined whether appearing digits matched or not the correct solution of the preceding problem. L group showed a lower number of correct responses, prolonged reaction times, and poorer performance on working memory (WM) tasks. P300 component showed significantly higher amplitudes for correct solutions in H, while N270 showed higher amplitudes for incorrect solutions. L children showed difficulty in recovering arithmetic facts and poorly modulated N270 and P300 components, probably reflecting WM processing problems affecting the construction and retrieval of numerical information.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"34 1","pages":"996 - 1010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2090571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fact retrieval deficits have been documented in children with mathematical learning disabilities. We assessed the retrieval of arithmetic facts in neurotypical 9-to-10-year-old children with different mathematical achievement levels using event-related potential methods while performing an arithmetic verification task (addition, subtraction, and multiplication). Forty-eight participants were divided into High (H), Average (A), and Low (L) mathematics performance according to their scores on The Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4). Children determined whether appearing digits matched or not the correct solution of the preceding problem. L group showed a lower number of correct responses, prolonged reaction times, and poorer performance on working memory (WM) tasks. P300 component showed significantly higher amplitudes for correct solutions in H, while N270 showed higher amplitudes for incorrect solutions. L children showed difficulty in recovering arithmetic facts and poorly modulated N270 and P300 components, probably reflecting WM processing problems affecting the construction and retrieval of numerical information.
不同数学成就水平儿童算术事实检索的事件相关脑电位研究
摘要数学学习障碍儿童存在事实检索缺陷。我们在执行算术验证任务(加法、减法和乘法)时,使用事件相关电位方法评估了具有不同数学成就水平的9至10岁神经正常儿童的算术事实检索情况。48名参与者根据他们在广泛成就测试4(WRAT4)中的得分,被分为数学成绩高(H)、平均(A)和低(L)。孩子们确定出现的数字是否符合前面问题的正确解决方案。L组的正确反应次数较少,反应时间延长,工作记忆(WM)任务表现较差。P300分量在H的正确溶液中显示出显著更高的振幅,而N270在不正确溶液中表现出更高的幅度。L名儿童在恢复算术事实方面表现出困难,N270和P300成分调制较差,可能反映了影响数字信息构建和检索的WM处理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Journal of Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信