Being Neighbourly: Urban Reserves, Treaty Settlement Lands, and the Discursive Construction of Municipal–First Nation Relations

IF 0.8 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
J. Barry
{"title":"Being Neighbourly: Urban Reserves, Treaty Settlement Lands, and the Discursive Construction of Municipal–First Nation Relations","authors":"J. Barry","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2019.10.5.8515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ongoing land claims negotiations are creating areas of First Nation authority within and adjacent to many urban centres. Several government agencies and lobby groups have responded to these changes with discussion papers and toolkits, all implicitly or explicitly intended to help municipal and First Nation governments become better \"neighbours.\" Using the theoretical and methodological insights found in critical discourse and interpretive policy analysis, this article examines the prevalence of this \"neighbour-to-neighbour\" discourse in municipal and other non-Indigenous policy, placing a particular focus on how it is used in land-use planning. I explore how these policy documents discursively construct and articulate a distinctly and deeply settler-colonial perspective on the desired relationship between First Nations and municipalities: one that has clear antecedents in liberal-economic notions of property, and that serves to conceal key aspects of Indigenous authority.","PeriodicalId":13707,"journal":{"name":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2019.10.5.8515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ongoing land claims negotiations are creating areas of First Nation authority within and adjacent to many urban centres. Several government agencies and lobby groups have responded to these changes with discussion papers and toolkits, all implicitly or explicitly intended to help municipal and First Nation governments become better "neighbours." Using the theoretical and methodological insights found in critical discourse and interpretive policy analysis, this article examines the prevalence of this "neighbour-to-neighbour" discourse in municipal and other non-Indigenous policy, placing a particular focus on how it is used in land-use planning. I explore how these policy documents discursively construct and articulate a distinctly and deeply settler-colonial perspective on the desired relationship between First Nations and municipalities: one that has clear antecedents in liberal-economic notions of property, and that serves to conceal key aspects of Indigenous authority.
为邻:城市保留地、条约定居地与城市第一民族关系的话语建构
正在进行的土地索赔谈判正在许多城市中心内和附近建立第一民族权力区。一些政府机构和游说团体通过讨论文件和工具包对这些变化做出了回应,所有这些文件和工具包都隐含或明确地旨在帮助市政府和第一民族政府成为更好的“邻居”,本文考察了这种“邻居对邻居”的话语在市政和其他非土著政策中的普遍性,特别关注它在土地利用规划中的使用。我探讨了这些政策文件是如何以散漫的方式构建和阐明一种明确而深刻的定居者殖民主义视角,来看待原住民和市政当局之间的理想关系:这种关系在自由经济的财产观念中有着明确的先例,并有助于掩盖土著权力的关键方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信