Isaac Leeser and Slavery: A Match Made in Richmond

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
David Weinfeld
{"title":"Isaac Leeser and Slavery: A Match Made in Richmond","authors":"David Weinfeld","doi":"10.1353/ajh.2022.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In October 1850, The Occident and American Jewish Advocate published an article titled “Judaism and its Principles.” The piece was written by Isaac Leeser (1806–68), founder and editor of the newspaper and former hazan of Philadelphia’s Congregation Mikveh Israel. The article reflected the breadth and depth of Leeser’s Jewish knowledge. Leeser was a prolific writer, translator, publisher of Jewish works, and, despite being a staunch traditionalist, innovator in his efforts to reach and teach American Jews. In the article, Leeser contrasted the certainty of revelation with the unreliability of reason. “What one man calls reasonable another may . . . style absurd; or what is perfectly consonant with the notions generally prevailing this year that is the current spirit of the age, may fall within the next twelve months beneath the axe of some sharpwitted critic.” As an example of ethical uncertainty Leeser suggested “the institution of slavery.” He noted that many Southern slave owners had once pronounced slavery “the greatest curse under which they labored,” while most Northerners approached the institution “with a great degree of indifference.” As Northern “abhorrence of slaveholding has increased,” however, Southern ideas have undergone a “corresponding mutation” such that even women “advocate the state of bondage as the happiest for the African race.” Slavery was viewed as a “patriarchal” institution, “promotive of mutual blessing to the master and servant.” Leeser pointed to the curious phrase, “the blessings of slavery,” to demonstrate the difficulty in making moral sense of the problem. He concluded with a paean to ethical relativism: “Both Southerners and Northerners are equally sincere in their views that the one loves as ardently as the other detests the presence of negro bondmen.” By equating proand anti-","PeriodicalId":43104,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY","volume":"106 1","pages":"231 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajh.2022.0033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In October 1850, The Occident and American Jewish Advocate published an article titled “Judaism and its Principles.” The piece was written by Isaac Leeser (1806–68), founder and editor of the newspaper and former hazan of Philadelphia’s Congregation Mikveh Israel. The article reflected the breadth and depth of Leeser’s Jewish knowledge. Leeser was a prolific writer, translator, publisher of Jewish works, and, despite being a staunch traditionalist, innovator in his efforts to reach and teach American Jews. In the article, Leeser contrasted the certainty of revelation with the unreliability of reason. “What one man calls reasonable another may . . . style absurd; or what is perfectly consonant with the notions generally prevailing this year that is the current spirit of the age, may fall within the next twelve months beneath the axe of some sharpwitted critic.” As an example of ethical uncertainty Leeser suggested “the institution of slavery.” He noted that many Southern slave owners had once pronounced slavery “the greatest curse under which they labored,” while most Northerners approached the institution “with a great degree of indifference.” As Northern “abhorrence of slaveholding has increased,” however, Southern ideas have undergone a “corresponding mutation” such that even women “advocate the state of bondage as the happiest for the African race.” Slavery was viewed as a “patriarchal” institution, “promotive of mutual blessing to the master and servant.” Leeser pointed to the curious phrase, “the blessings of slavery,” to demonstrate the difficulty in making moral sense of the problem. He concluded with a paean to ethical relativism: “Both Southerners and Northerners are equally sincere in their views that the one loves as ardently as the other detests the presence of negro bondmen.” By equating proand anti-
艾萨克·利泽和奴隶制:里士满的匹配
1850年10月,《欧美犹太倡导者》发表了一篇题为《犹太教及其原则》的文章。这篇文章的作者是艾萨克·利泽(1806 - 1868),他是报纸的创始人和编辑,也是费城会众Mikveh Israel的前hazan。这篇文章反映了利泽对犹太知识的广度和深度。Leeser是一位多产的作家、翻译家、犹太作品的出版商,尽管他是一位坚定的传统主义者,但他在努力接触和教育美国犹太人方面却进行了创新。在文章中,Leeser对比了启示的确定性和理性的不可靠性。“一个人认为合理的东西,另一个人可能……荒谬的风格;或者,那些与今年普遍流行的观念完全一致的东西,也就是当前的时代精神,可能会在未来12个月内被一些精明的评论家砍下。”作为道德不确定性的一个例子,Leeser提出了“奴隶制制度”。他指出,许多南方奴隶主曾经宣称奴隶制是“他们在其中劳动的最大诅咒”,而大多数北方人对这一制度“非常漠不关心”。然而,随着北方“对蓄奴的憎恶日益加深”,南方的思想也发生了“相应的突变”,甚至连妇女都“主张奴隶制是非洲种族最幸福的状态”。奴隶制被视为一种“父权”制度,“促进了主人和仆人的相互祝福”。利泽提到了一个奇怪的短语,“奴隶制的祝福”,以说明在道德上理解这个问题是多么困难。他以一种道德相对主义的口吻总结道:“南方人和北方人都同样真诚地认为,一个人对黑人奴隶的热爱和另一个人对黑人奴隶的厌恶是一样强烈的。”把正反-等同起来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: American Jewish History is the official publication of the American Jewish Historical Society, the oldest national ethnic historical organization in the United States. The most widely recognized journal in its field, AJH focuses on every aspect ofthe American Jewish experience. Founded in 1892 as Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, AJH has been the journal of record in American Jewish history for over a century, bringing readers all the richness and complexity of Jewish life in America through carefully researched, thoroughly accessible articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信