The Impact of Dose Reduction of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin on Oncological Outcomes and Toxicity in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Bladder Cancer Pub Date : 2023-09-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3233/BLC-230044
Wadi Azuri, Jorge Horacio Jaunarena, Juan Jorge Camean, Joaquín Chemi, Alberto Villaronga, Siamak Daneshmand, Gustavo Martín Villoldo
{"title":"The Impact of Dose Reduction of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin on Oncological Outcomes and Toxicity in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wadi Azuri, Jorge Horacio Jaunarena, Juan Jorge Camean, Joaquín Chemi, Alberto Villaronga, Siamak Daneshmand, Gustavo Martín Villoldo","doi":"10.3233/BLC-230044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the standard adjuvant treatment for intermediate and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) following transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). However, the optimal dose, strain, and schedule of BCG remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of BCG dose reduction on oncological outcomes and toxicity in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of the literature in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Selected studies were analyzed for Meta Analysis using PRISMA criteria. The study focused on disease recurrence, progression, and toxicity. We also compared the oncological outcomes of the different BCG strains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2963 patients in 13 randomized controlled trials were included. In recurrence analysis, we found a non-significant difference between the full dose and any dose reduction of BCG (RR = 1.17, [1.06-1.28], I2 = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.7). In terms of progression, the difference was also non-statistically significant (RR: 1.12 [0.89 - 1.41], I2 = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.93). In the toxicity analysis, there were more local (RR: 0.81 [0.67-0.99] I2 = 76%; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and systemic (RR: 0.53 [0.34-0.82] I2 = 83%; <i>p</i> < 0.01) side effects in the full dose group than in the dose reduction group. There were no statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes between the analyzed BCG strains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dose reduction did not affect the oncological outcomes of patients with NMIBC who received adjuvant therapy with BCG. On the other hand, dose reduction showed a significant trend towards fewer systemic and local side effects. Further studies comparing oncological and toxicity outcomes using different strains are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BLC-230044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the standard adjuvant treatment for intermediate and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) following transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). However, the optimal dose, strain, and schedule of BCG remain unclear.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of BCG dose reduction on oncological outcomes and toxicity in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Selected studies were analyzed for Meta Analysis using PRISMA criteria. The study focused on disease recurrence, progression, and toxicity. We also compared the oncological outcomes of the different BCG strains.

Results: A total of 2963 patients in 13 randomized controlled trials were included. In recurrence analysis, we found a non-significant difference between the full dose and any dose reduction of BCG (RR = 1.17, [1.06-1.28], I2 = 0%, p = 0.7). In terms of progression, the difference was also non-statistically significant (RR: 1.12 [0.89 - 1.41], I2 = 0%, p = 0.93). In the toxicity analysis, there were more local (RR: 0.81 [0.67-0.99] I2 = 76%; p < 0.01) and systemic (RR: 0.53 [0.34-0.82] I2 = 83%; p < 0.01) side effects in the full dose group than in the dose reduction group. There were no statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes between the analyzed BCG strains.

Conclusions: Dose reduction did not affect the oncological outcomes of patients with NMIBC who received adjuvant therapy with BCG. On the other hand, dose reduction showed a significant trend towards fewer systemic and local side effects. Further studies comparing oncological and toxicity outcomes using different strains are needed.

卡介苗减少剂量对非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌肿瘤预后和毒性的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:卡介苗(BCG)是经尿道膀胱切除术(TURB)后中高风险性非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的标准辅助治疗。然而,卡介苗的最佳剂量、毒株和接种时间表仍不清楚。目的:评价减少卡介苗剂量对非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者肿瘤预后和毒性的影响。方法:我们对PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中的文献进行了系统综述。选取的研究采用PRISMA标准进行Meta分析。该研究的重点是疾病的复发、进展和毒性。我们还比较了不同卡介苗株的肿瘤预后。结果:13项随机对照试验共纳入2963例患者。在复发分析中,我们发现卡介苗完全剂量与任何剂量减少之间无显著差异(HR = 1.17, [1.06-1.28], I2 = 0%, p = 0.7)。在进展方面,差异也无统计学意义(HR: 1.12 [0.89 - 1.41], I2 = 0%, p = 0.93)。毒理分析中,局部毒理较多(HR: 0.81;0.99] i2 = 76%;p < 0.01)和系统性(HR: 0.53 [0.34;0.82] i2 = 83%;P < 0.01),全剂量组不良反应发生率明显高于减剂量组。所分析的卡介苗株之间的肿瘤预后无统计学差异。结论:剂量减少对接受卡介苗辅助治疗的NMIBC患者的肿瘤预后没有影响。另一方面,剂量减少显示出减少全身和局部副作用的显著趋势。需要进一步的研究来比较不同菌株的肿瘤和毒性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Bladder Cancer is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the epidemiology/etiology, genetics, molecular correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, ethics, patient advocacy and survivorship, diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine that expedites our fundamental understanding and improves treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信