Stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung metastases from colorectal cancer: a single institution experience

IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY
R. Wegner, N. Ahmed, S. Hasan, James T McCormick, A. Kirichenko, A. Colonias
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung metastases from colorectal cancer: a single institution experience","authors":"R. Wegner, N. Ahmed, S. Hasan, James T McCormick, A. Kirichenko, A. Colonias","doi":"10.2217/CRC-2018-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been used as an alternative to surgical intervention to treat primary malignanices of the lung as well as lesions from other primaries. In this study, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT in treating lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). Materials & methods: We reviewed 22 patients that underwent lung SBRT for metastases from CRC. Almost all patients received chemotherapy before and after undergoing SBRT. Outcomes that were analyzed included overall survival, distant failure and progression-free survival, as well as the effects of biologically effective dose (BED) and KRAS status on local control. Results: Seven females and 15 males underwent SBRT to lung metastases from CRC. The median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status was one (0–2). The median dose was 48 Gy (40–54 Gy) in 5 fx (4–8 fx) and the median number of nodules treated with SBRT was one (1–3). Median follow-up was 28.5 months from SBRT and 79 months (9–145) from primary diagnosis. Local control at 1 and 3 years was 75 and 58%, respectively. There was a trend toward improved local control with increasing biologically effective dose (BED10 > 100; p = 0.07). Cancers that were positive for the KRAS mutation had increased local control at 12 months, 100 versus 75% (p = 0.0199). Median OS from the primary diagnosis of CRC and from SBRT was 79 and 31 months, respectively. There were no predictors for OS. There were no episodes of acute or late grade 3 or higher toxicity. Conclusion: The results of this study add to the growing body of literature to support SBRT for lung metastases, specifically those patients with limited lung metastases from CRC. The choice of radiation dose remains important, even in metastatic disease, as highlighted by the trend toward improved local control with increasing BED10.","PeriodicalId":43638,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Cancer","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/CRC-2018-0005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/CRC-2018-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been used as an alternative to surgical intervention to treat primary malignanices of the lung as well as lesions from other primaries. In this study, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT in treating lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). Materials & methods: We reviewed 22 patients that underwent lung SBRT for metastases from CRC. Almost all patients received chemotherapy before and after undergoing SBRT. Outcomes that were analyzed included overall survival, distant failure and progression-free survival, as well as the effects of biologically effective dose (BED) and KRAS status on local control. Results: Seven females and 15 males underwent SBRT to lung metastases from CRC. The median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status was one (0–2). The median dose was 48 Gy (40–54 Gy) in 5 fx (4–8 fx) and the median number of nodules treated with SBRT was one (1–3). Median follow-up was 28.5 months from SBRT and 79 months (9–145) from primary diagnosis. Local control at 1 and 3 years was 75 and 58%, respectively. There was a trend toward improved local control with increasing biologically effective dose (BED10 > 100; p = 0.07). Cancers that were positive for the KRAS mutation had increased local control at 12 months, 100 versus 75% (p = 0.0199). Median OS from the primary diagnosis of CRC and from SBRT was 79 and 31 months, respectively. There were no predictors for OS. There were no episodes of acute or late grade 3 or higher toxicity. Conclusion: The results of this study add to the growing body of literature to support SBRT for lung metastases, specifically those patients with limited lung metastases from CRC. The choice of radiation dose remains important, even in metastatic disease, as highlighted by the trend toward improved local control with increasing BED10.
立体定向放射治疗结直肠癌肺转移:单一机构经验
目的:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)已被用作外科手术干预的替代方法,用于治疗原发性肺恶性肿瘤以及其他原发性病变。在这项研究中,我们评估了SBRT治疗结直肠癌(CRC)肺转移的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:我们回顾了22例接受肺SBRT治疗结直肠癌转移的患者。几乎所有患者在SBRT前后都接受了化疗。分析的结果包括总生存期、远期失败期和无进展生存期,以及生物有效剂量(BED)和KRAS状态对局部控制的影响。结果:7名女性和15名男性接受了SBRT治疗结直肠癌的肺转移。东部肿瘤合作组的中位评分为1(0-2)。5个fx(4-8个fx)中位剂量为48 Gy (40-54 Gy), SBRT治疗的中位结节数为1个(1-3个)。从SBRT开始的中位随访时间为28.5个月,从初次诊断开始的中位随访时间为79个月(9-145)。1年和3年的局部控制率分别为75%和58%。随着生物有效剂量的增加,局部控制有改善的趋势(BED10 bb100;p = 0.07)。KRAS突变阳性的癌症在12个月时局部控制率增加,分别为100%和75% (p = 0.0199)。从最初诊断为结直肠癌和SBRT开始的中位OS分别为79和31个月。没有预测OS。没有急性或晚期3级或更高的毒性发作。结论:本研究的结果增加了越来越多的文献支持SBRT治疗肺转移,特别是那些有限肺转移的结直肠癌患者。放射剂量的选择仍然很重要,即使在转移性疾病中,随着BED10的增加,局部控制的改善趋势也突出了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer ONCOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Colorectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the developed world. Risk factors for colorectal cancer are on the rise in many countries; populations are aging, and obesity and diabetes are increasing. National screening programs are helping to detect cancer while it is still curable; however, colorectal cancer remains the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA and options are still limited for those with more advanced disease. Consequently, colorectal cancer is a major research priority for government, pharmaceutical companies and non-profit organizations. Research into diagnosis and optimum treatment of the disease is progressing rapidly, with new advances reported every day. Colorectal Cancer presents reviews, analysis and commentary. on all aspects of colorectal cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信