Ethnic mental health inequalities and mental health policies in England 1999-2020

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Basharat Hussain, A. Hui, S. Timmons, K. Nkhoma
{"title":"Ethnic mental health inequalities and mental health policies in England 1999-2020","authors":"Basharat Hussain, A. Hui, S. Timmons, K. Nkhoma","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-06-2021-0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper presents a thematic synthesis of mental health policies published in England from 1999 to 2020.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper aims to present a thematic synthesis of mental health policies published in England from 1999 to 2020. The authors specifically focus on ethnicity-related mental health issues highlighted in policies, policy recommendations and performance measurements of policy implementation.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings from this synthesis demonstrate that ethnic mental health inequalities remain comparable over the past two decades. Ongoing issues include a lack of data on the ethnicity of mental health services users. Where data is available, these highlight ethnic inequalities in access to, experiences of and outcomes of mental health services, as well as a lack of cultural capability in health-care professionals. Policy recommendations have also remained the same during this time and include: collecting data on the ethnicity of service users, raising awareness of the cultural needs of Black and Minority ethnic populations amongst health-care professionals, recruiting BME staff into mental health care services and improving community engagement. The synthesis identified poor indicators of performance measurement on policy implementation and weak monitoring regimes.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe synthesis identified poor indicators of performance measurement on policy implementation and weak monitoring regimes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper presents a thematic synthesis of mental health policies published in England from 1999 to 2020.\n","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-06-2021-0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This paper presents a thematic synthesis of mental health policies published in England from 1999 to 2020. Design/methodology/approach This paper aims to present a thematic synthesis of mental health policies published in England from 1999 to 2020. The authors specifically focus on ethnicity-related mental health issues highlighted in policies, policy recommendations and performance measurements of policy implementation. Findings Findings from this synthesis demonstrate that ethnic mental health inequalities remain comparable over the past two decades. Ongoing issues include a lack of data on the ethnicity of mental health services users. Where data is available, these highlight ethnic inequalities in access to, experiences of and outcomes of mental health services, as well as a lack of cultural capability in health-care professionals. Policy recommendations have also remained the same during this time and include: collecting data on the ethnicity of service users, raising awareness of the cultural needs of Black and Minority ethnic populations amongst health-care professionals, recruiting BME staff into mental health care services and improving community engagement. The synthesis identified poor indicators of performance measurement on policy implementation and weak monitoring regimes. Practical implications The synthesis identified poor indicators of performance measurement on policy implementation and weak monitoring regimes. Originality/value This paper presents a thematic synthesis of mental health policies published in England from 1999 to 2020.
1999-2020年英国民族心理健康不平等与心理健康政策
目的:本文介绍了1999年至2020年英国公布的精神卫生政策的专题综合。设计/方法/方法本文的目的是对1999年至2020年英国公布的精神卫生政策进行专题综合。作者特别关注政策、政策建议和政策执行绩效衡量中突出的与种族有关的心理健康问题。这一综合研究的结果表明,在过去二十年中,种族心理健康不平等仍然具有可比性。目前存在的问题包括缺乏关于心理健康服务使用者族裔的数据。在有数据的情况下,这些问题突出了在获得精神卫生服务、获得精神卫生服务的经验和结果方面的种族不平等,以及保健专业人员缺乏文化能力。在此期间,政策建议也保持不变,包括:收集有关服务使用者族裔的数据,提高卫生保健专业人员对黑人和少数族裔人口文化需求的认识,招募黑人和少数族裔工作人员加入精神保健服务,以及改善社区参与。综合报告确定了衡量政策执行情况的不良指标和薄弱的监测制度。实际影响该综合报告确定了政策执行绩效衡量指标不佳和监测机制薄弱。原创性/价值本文介绍了1999年至2020年英国发表的精神卫生政策的专题综合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信