Nurses' Awareness, Perceived Knowledge, Attitude Towards and Barriers in Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

Louie Roy Catu
{"title":"Nurses' Awareness, Perceived Knowledge, Attitude Towards and Barriers in Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)","authors":"Louie Roy Catu","doi":"10.37719/jhcs.2021.v3i1.oa001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is one strategy that enables clinicians to succeed in handling emerging literature, and integrating it to achieve high-quality patient outcomes. Although beneficial and innovative it is not considered a priority by many. Most nurses have little, if any, exposure to the clinical research process.  \nPurpose: This study aimed to conduct a baseline assessment of perceived knowledge, attitude toward EBP, and barriers to adopting EBP in nursing.  \nMethods: The study used a descriptive cross-sectional quantitative design. A convenient sample of 406 nurses participated and completed the EBP questionnaire. For ethical clearance, granted approval from Hospitals’ Research Ethics Committee and to HAU-IRB.  \nResults: Nurses (n = 156, 38.4%) believes that EBP holistically is composed of patient data and preference, healthcare professionals’ skills, and research findings. They (n = 256, 63%) have a positive attitude towards EBP and are willing to accept new healthcare strategies based on research. But expresses less confidence (M = 3.90, SD = 0.64) in identifying clinical issues/problems and translate these into a well-crafted clinical question. They perceived themselves to possess moderate levels of skills to undertake different EBP activities (M = 3.76, SD = 0.61). Knowledge (x(4) = 12.174, p = 0.02), attitudes toward EBP (U = 13947.5, p = 0.04) were significantly better among nurses who had previous EBP training. Similarly, respondents with EBP-related training are more confident in integrating EBP into their practice (U = 13408, p = 0.01).  \nConclusion: Nurses’ highest level of education and years of clinical experience affects their implementation skills in adopting EBP. The study reflected the benefits of training, continuing education, and length of experience in the acquisition of skills. Findings can serve as a basis for developing programs to improve nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards EBP. Nurse administrators can create policies that address barriers identified in the study. ","PeriodicalId":52640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Caring Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37719/jhcs.2021.v3i1.oa001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is one strategy that enables clinicians to succeed in handling emerging literature, and integrating it to achieve high-quality patient outcomes. Although beneficial and innovative it is not considered a priority by many. Most nurses have little, if any, exposure to the clinical research process.  Purpose: This study aimed to conduct a baseline assessment of perceived knowledge, attitude toward EBP, and barriers to adopting EBP in nursing.  Methods: The study used a descriptive cross-sectional quantitative design. A convenient sample of 406 nurses participated and completed the EBP questionnaire. For ethical clearance, granted approval from Hospitals’ Research Ethics Committee and to HAU-IRB.  Results: Nurses (n = 156, 38.4%) believes that EBP holistically is composed of patient data and preference, healthcare professionals’ skills, and research findings. They (n = 256, 63%) have a positive attitude towards EBP and are willing to accept new healthcare strategies based on research. But expresses less confidence (M = 3.90, SD = 0.64) in identifying clinical issues/problems and translate these into a well-crafted clinical question. They perceived themselves to possess moderate levels of skills to undertake different EBP activities (M = 3.76, SD = 0.61). Knowledge (x(4) = 12.174, p = 0.02), attitudes toward EBP (U = 13947.5, p = 0.04) were significantly better among nurses who had previous EBP training. Similarly, respondents with EBP-related training are more confident in integrating EBP into their practice (U = 13408, p = 0.01).  Conclusion: Nurses’ highest level of education and years of clinical experience affects their implementation skills in adopting EBP. The study reflected the benefits of training, continuing education, and length of experience in the acquisition of skills. Findings can serve as a basis for developing programs to improve nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards EBP. Nurse administrators can create policies that address barriers identified in the study. 
护士循证实践(EBP)的认知、认知、态度和障碍
背景:循证实践(EBP)是一种使临床医生能够成功处理新兴文献并将其整合以实现高质量患者结果的策略。尽管这是有益的和创新的,但许多人并不认为这是一个优先事项。大多数护士很少(如果有的话)接触到临床研究过程。目的:本研究旨在对EBP的认知知识、态度以及在护理中采用EBP的障碍进行基线评估。方法:本研究采用描述性横断面定量设计。一个方便的样本406名护士参与并完成了EBP问卷。对于伦理许可,获得医院研究伦理委员会和HAU-IRB的批准。结果:护士(n=156,38.4%)认为EBP总体上由患者数据和偏好、医疗保健专业人员的技能和研究结果组成。他们(n=256,63%)对EBP持积极态度,并愿意接受基于研究的新医疗策略。但在识别临床问题/问题并将其转化为精心设计的临床问题方面,表达的信心较低(M=3.90,SD=0.64)。他们认为自己具有中等水平的技能来进行不同的EBP活动(M=3.76,SD=0.61)。在接受过EBP培训的护士中,知识(x(4)=12.174,p=0.02)和对EBP的态度(U=13947.5,p=0.04)明显更好。同样,接受过循证医学相关培训的受访者更有信心将循证医学纳入他们的实践(U=13408,p=0.01)。结论:护士的最高教育水平和多年的临床经验影响了他们采用循证医学的实施技能。这项研究反映了培训、继续教育和获得技能的经验长度的好处。研究结果可以作为制定计划的基础,以提高护士对循证医学的知识和态度。护士管理人员可以制定政策来解决研究中发现的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信