Influence of Intergenerational Parenting on Gross Motor Skills Among Children Aged 3-6 Years Old

Jiachen Lu, Xue Zhang, Yaohui He
{"title":"Influence of Intergenerational Parenting on Gross Motor Skills Among Children Aged 3-6 Years Old","authors":"Jiachen Lu, Xue Zhang, Yaohui He","doi":"10.18122/ijpah.020120.boisestate","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stage of 3-6 years old is a critical period for the development of children's gross motor skills, influencing their growth and \n development. Intergenerational parenting is a common way of family education in China. Studies have shown that the rough \n intergenerational parenting concept and limited energy of the elderly reduce the quality of life of the children under care (Qimeng \n Jiang, Nan Zhou, 2020). However, no research focused on the influence of intergenerational parenting on gross motor skills. This \n study aimed to explore the influence of different intergenerational parenting style on gross motor skills among children aged 3-6 \n years old. The participants were 62 children (25 boys and 37 girls) aged 3-6 years old from Liaoning Province. All of the participants \n were under intergenerational parenting. Gross motor skills were assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition \n (TGMD-3), which includes locomotor skills and ball skills components. The intergenerational parenting status was divided into \n parent-dominated intergenerational parenting and grandparent-dominated intergenerational parenting according to a questionnaire \n (Lu Ye, 2020). The parenting style included authoritative, authoritarian and tolerant styles. The scores of three styles were \n determined by the grandparents-reported Chinese version of Parental Authority Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, independent \n t-test and Pearson correlation were employed and the significant levels were set at 0.05. The results showed that participants had \n lower mean scores in both locomotor skills (Mboy = 12.58±4.42, Mgirl =13.51 ±3.03) and ball \n skills (Mboy = 8.46±2.9, Mgirl = 8.04±3.34) compared to the Chinese norm. There was no significant \n difference between parent-dominated and grandparent-dominated intergenerational parenting (M Parent-dominated =22.90±4.15, \n M grandparent-dominated = 20.48±4.47; t = 1.269, p = 0.209). Correlation analysis indicated a small association \n between the score of locomotor skills and authoritative style (r = 0.269, p < 0.05). No significant relationship was found between \n other parenting styles and the scores of TGMD-3. It is concluded that intergenerational parenting may negatively influence children’s \n gross motor development. Parent-dominated and grandparent-dominated intergenerational parenting may not have differences in children’s motor development. The authoritative parenting style of intergenerational education has certain impacts on children's gross motor skills, especially on children's locomotor skills.","PeriodicalId":73469,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physical activity and health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physical activity and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18122/ijpah.020120.boisestate","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stage of 3-6 years old is a critical period for the development of children's gross motor skills, influencing their growth and development. Intergenerational parenting is a common way of family education in China. Studies have shown that the rough intergenerational parenting concept and limited energy of the elderly reduce the quality of life of the children under care (Qimeng Jiang, Nan Zhou, 2020). However, no research focused on the influence of intergenerational parenting on gross motor skills. This study aimed to explore the influence of different intergenerational parenting style on gross motor skills among children aged 3-6 years old. The participants were 62 children (25 boys and 37 girls) aged 3-6 years old from Liaoning Province. All of the participants were under intergenerational parenting. Gross motor skills were assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition (TGMD-3), which includes locomotor skills and ball skills components. The intergenerational parenting status was divided into parent-dominated intergenerational parenting and grandparent-dominated intergenerational parenting according to a questionnaire (Lu Ye, 2020). The parenting style included authoritative, authoritarian and tolerant styles. The scores of three styles were determined by the grandparents-reported Chinese version of Parental Authority Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test and Pearson correlation were employed and the significant levels were set at 0.05. The results showed that participants had lower mean scores in both locomotor skills (Mboy = 12.58±4.42, Mgirl =13.51 ±3.03) and ball skills (Mboy = 8.46±2.9, Mgirl = 8.04±3.34) compared to the Chinese norm. There was no significant difference between parent-dominated and grandparent-dominated intergenerational parenting (M Parent-dominated =22.90±4.15, M grandparent-dominated = 20.48±4.47; t = 1.269, p = 0.209). Correlation analysis indicated a small association between the score of locomotor skills and authoritative style (r = 0.269, p < 0.05). No significant relationship was found between other parenting styles and the scores of TGMD-3. It is concluded that intergenerational parenting may negatively influence children’s gross motor development. Parent-dominated and grandparent-dominated intergenerational parenting may not have differences in children’s motor development. The authoritative parenting style of intergenerational education has certain impacts on children's gross motor skills, especially on children's locomotor skills.
代际养育对3-6岁儿童毛运动技能的影响
3-6岁阶段是儿童大动作技能发展的关键时期,影响着儿童的生长发育。代际育儿是中国家庭教育的一种常见方式。研究表明,粗糙的代际育儿观念和老年人有限的精力降低了被照顾子女的生活质量(蒋其梦,周楠,2020)。然而,没有研究关注代际养育对大动作技能的影响。本研究旨在探讨不同代际父母教养方式对3 ~ 6岁儿童大肌肉运动技能的影响。研究对象为62名年龄在3-6岁的辽宁省儿童(男25名,女37名)。所有的参与者都接受了代际养育。大肌肉运动技能采用大肌肉运动发展测试-第三版(TGMD-3)进行评估,其中包括运动技能和球类技能。通过问卷调查,将代际育儿状况分为父母主导的代际育儿和祖父母主导的代际育儿(陆晔,2020)。教养方式包括权威型、专制型和宽容型。三种风格的得分由祖父母自述的中文版《父母权威问卷》决定。采用描述性统计、独立t检验和Pearson相关,显著水平设为0.05。结果表明,运动技能(Mboy = 12.58±4.42,Mgirl =13.51±3.03)和球类技能(Mboy = 8.46±2.9,Mgirl = 8.04±3.34)的平均分均低于中国标准。父母主导型与祖父母主导型代际教养差异无统计学意义(M父母主导型=22.90±4.15,M祖父母主导型= 20.48±4.47;T = 1.269, p = 0.209)。相关分析显示,运动技能得分与权威风格得分之间存在较小的相关性(r = 0.269, p < 0.05)。其他教养方式与TGMD-3得分无显著关系。结果表明,代际教养对儿童大肌肉运动发育有负面影响。父母主导和祖父母主导的代际养育方式在儿童运动发展方面可能没有差异。代际教育的权威型父母教养方式对儿童大肌肉运动技能,尤其是运动技能有一定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信