EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL OUTCOME OF SIX VERSUS FOUR STRANDS AUTOLOGOUS HAMSTRING GRAFT FOR ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

Midhat M Mahdi, A. Lafta
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL OUTCOME OF SIX VERSUS FOUR STRANDS AUTOLOGOUS HAMSTRING GRAFT FOR ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION","authors":"Midhat M Mahdi, A. Lafta","doi":"10.33762/bsurg.2021.170238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common injury among sport men. Currently the arthroscopic reconstruction is the gold standard treatment in majority of cases. There are different ways to do the surgery, different approaches and different grafts. Each has its advantages and draw backs. The autologous four strands hamstring graft is a widely used graft. A new method of using six strands graft is now used to strengthen the graft. This study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the patients underwent a six strand autologous hamstring graft ACL reconstruction and those done with four strands graft. It`s retrospective and prospective comparative study carried out in Basrah Teaching Hospital. Started at January 2015. Twenty one patients with six strands graft included prospectively and 35 patients with four strands included retrospectively from previous study. All patients were subjected to the same procedure by the same surgeon. The patients are assessed preoperatively by stability tests and Tegner Lysholm score,then followed up after 6 months and after one year by the same tests and Tegner Lysholm score. Twenty one male patients with six strands graft have age ranging from 20 to 35 years (mean 26.1±3.9). A thirty five patients with four strands were included, their age were (24.6±2) years. In the six strands group (71.6%) were sport men versus (82.8%) in the four strands group. The six strands graft size ranged 8-11 mm with mean (9.9±0.8)mm, while the four strands graft size ranged 7-9.5 mm with mean (8.5mm). After one year the results was instability (9.5%) of the six strands group versus (25.8%) in the four strands group. The mean postoperative Tegner Lysholm score in six strands group was (92.9±6) with excellent in (85%) while it was excellent in (22.8%) of the four strands group, although the mean Lysholm score not mentioned in the previous study. In conclusions, the six strands autologous hamstring graft is an alternative method for ACL reconstruction particularly when the four strands graft cannot provide sufficient size.","PeriodicalId":52765,"journal":{"name":"Basrah Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basrah Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33762/bsurg.2021.170238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common injury among sport men. Currently the arthroscopic reconstruction is the gold standard treatment in majority of cases. There are different ways to do the surgery, different approaches and different grafts. Each has its advantages and draw backs. The autologous four strands hamstring graft is a widely used graft. A new method of using six strands graft is now used to strengthen the graft. This study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the patients underwent a six strand autologous hamstring graft ACL reconstruction and those done with four strands graft. It`s retrospective and prospective comparative study carried out in Basrah Teaching Hospital. Started at January 2015. Twenty one patients with six strands graft included prospectively and 35 patients with four strands included retrospectively from previous study. All patients were subjected to the same procedure by the same surgeon. The patients are assessed preoperatively by stability tests and Tegner Lysholm score,then followed up after 6 months and after one year by the same tests and Tegner Lysholm score. Twenty one male patients with six strands graft have age ranging from 20 to 35 years (mean 26.1±3.9). A thirty five patients with four strands were included, their age were (24.6±2) years. In the six strands group (71.6%) were sport men versus (82.8%) in the four strands group. The six strands graft size ranged 8-11 mm with mean (9.9±0.8)mm, while the four strands graft size ranged 7-9.5 mm with mean (8.5mm). After one year the results was instability (9.5%) of the six strands group versus (25.8%) in the four strands group. The mean postoperative Tegner Lysholm score in six strands group was (92.9±6) with excellent in (85%) while it was excellent in (22.8%) of the four strands group, although the mean Lysholm score not mentioned in the previous study. In conclusions, the six strands autologous hamstring graft is an alternative method for ACL reconstruction particularly when the four strands graft cannot provide sufficient size.
关节镜下前交叉韧带重建中六股与四股自体腘绳肌腱移植的临床效果评价
前交叉韧带损伤是一种常见的运动损伤。目前,关节镜重建是大多数病例的金标准治疗方法。手术有不同的方法,不同的方法和不同的移植物。每种方法都有其优点和缺点。自体四股肌腱移植物是一种应用广泛的移植物。一种使用六股移植物的新方法现在被用来加强移植物。本研究旨在比较接受六股自体腘绳肌移植物ACL重建和接受四股移植物重建的患者的临床结果。这是在巴士拉教学医院进行的回顾性和前瞻性比较研究。始于2015年1月。前瞻性纳入21例六股移植物患者,回顾性纳入35例四股移植物的患者。所有患者都由同一位外科医生进行相同的手术。患者在术前通过稳定性测试和Tegner-Lysholm评分进行评估,然后在6个月后和一年后通过相同的测试和Tegner-Lysholm评分进行随访。21名男性六股移植物患者的年龄在20至35岁之间(平均26.1±3.9)。包括35名四股移植物的患者,他们的年龄为(24.6±2)岁。在六股组中(71.6%)是运动型男性,而在四股组中为(82.8%)。六股移植物尺寸范围为8-11 mm,平均值为(9.9±0.8)mm,而四股移植物的尺寸范围为7-9.5 mm,平均为(8.5mm)。一年后,结果是六股组的不稳定性(9.5%)与四股组的(25.8%)。六股线组的术后平均Tegner-Lysholm评分为(92.9±6),优良率为(85%),而四股线组为(22.8%),尽管之前的研究中没有提到平均Lysholm评分。总之,六股自体腘绳肌移植物是ACL重建的一种替代方法,尤其是当四股移植物不能提供足够的尺寸时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信