The Impact of Item Parceling Ratios and Strategies on the Internal Structure of Assessment Center Ratings

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Anne Buckett, Jurgen Becker, G. Roodt
{"title":"The Impact of Item Parceling Ratios and Strategies on the Internal Structure of Assessment Center Ratings","authors":"Anne Buckett, Jurgen Becker, G. Roodt","doi":"10.1027/1866-5888/A000266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether using item parcels instead of single indicators would increase support for the factorial validity of assessment center (AC) ratings in factor analytic applications. Factor analytic analyses of AC ratings are often plagued by poor model fit as well as admissibility and termination problems. In the present study, three purposive item parceling strategies, in conjunction with three parceling approaches (specifying different ratios of indicators to dimensions), were investigated in relation to five confirmatory factor analysis specifications of AC ratings across two AC samples (Sample 1: N = 244; Sample 2: N = 320). The findings were equivocal across the two samples. Nonetheless, a three-parcel approach using a factorial allocation strategy performed better that a one-parcel approach (akin to the postexercise dimension rating).","PeriodicalId":46765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personnel Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personnel Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/A000266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether using item parcels instead of single indicators would increase support for the factorial validity of assessment center (AC) ratings in factor analytic applications. Factor analytic analyses of AC ratings are often plagued by poor model fit as well as admissibility and termination problems. In the present study, three purposive item parceling strategies, in conjunction with three parceling approaches (specifying different ratios of indicators to dimensions), were investigated in relation to five confirmatory factor analysis specifications of AC ratings across two AC samples (Sample 1: N = 244; Sample 2: N = 320). The findings were equivocal across the two samples. Nonetheless, a three-parcel approach using a factorial allocation strategy performed better that a one-parcel approach (akin to the postexercise dimension rating).
项目包裹率及策略对评估中心评级内部结构的影响
摘要本研究的目的是探讨在因子分析应用中,使用项目包代替单一指标是否会增加对评估中心(AC)评级的析因效度的支持。交流额定值的因子分析经常受到模型拟合不良以及可容许性和终止问题的困扰。在本研究中,三种有目的的项目包装策略,结合三种包装方法(指定不同的指标与维度的比例),研究了两个AC样本(样本1:N = 244;样本2:N = 320)。这两个样本的结果是模棱两可的。尽管如此,使用阶乘分配策略的三包方法比单包方法(类似于练习后维度评级)执行得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personnel Psychology
Journal of Personnel Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信