Cinco regímenes políticos en Latinoamérica, libertad de internet y mecanismos de control

IF 1.5 Q2 ECONOMICS
Iria Puyosa, Armando Chaguaceda
{"title":"Cinco regímenes políticos en Latinoamérica, libertad de internet y mecanismos de control","authors":"Iria Puyosa, Armando Chaguaceda","doi":"10.17163/RET.N14.2017.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2010, there has been a trend towards establishing internet control and securitization policies (Freedom House, 2016). The literature on the subject indicates that the mechanisms of internet control vary according to the type of political regimes. The objective of this work is to verify if the policies of control of Internet in Latin America vary according to the type of prevailing political regime. For the study were selected five Latin American countries that are categorized as examples of different political regimes: Chile, Mexico, Ecuador, Venezuela and Cuba. For each case, the indicators related to freedom of expression on the internet are reported in accordance with the data provided by «Varieties of Democracy». «Freedom on the Net» categorizations are used as a complement. The results indicate that there is a correlation between political regime (measured by polyarchy index) and internet freedom. Indeed the more autocratic the regime is, the more first-generation internet controls are observed, with censorship of contents and violations of users’ rights. While in hybrid regimes second-generation controls are more commonly observed, which involve obstacles to access, without reaching content blocking and network outages.","PeriodicalId":52034,"journal":{"name":"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia","volume":"7 1","pages":"11-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17163/RET.N14.2017.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Since 2010, there has been a trend towards establishing internet control and securitization policies (Freedom House, 2016). The literature on the subject indicates that the mechanisms of internet control vary according to the type of political regimes. The objective of this work is to verify if the policies of control of Internet in Latin America vary according to the type of prevailing political regime. For the study were selected five Latin American countries that are categorized as examples of different political regimes: Chile, Mexico, Ecuador, Venezuela and Cuba. For each case, the indicators related to freedom of expression on the internet are reported in accordance with the data provided by «Varieties of Democracy». «Freedom on the Net» categorizations are used as a complement. The results indicate that there is a correlation between political regime (measured by polyarchy index) and internet freedom. Indeed the more autocratic the regime is, the more first-generation internet controls are observed, with censorship of contents and violations of users’ rights. While in hybrid regimes second-generation controls are more commonly observed, which involve obstacles to access, without reaching content blocking and network outages.
拉丁美洲的五种政治制度、互联网自由和控制机制
自2010年以来,出现了建立互联网控制和证券化政策的趋势(Freedom House, 2016)。有关这一主题的文献表明,互联网控制的机制因政治体制的类型而异。这项工作的目的是验证拉丁美洲的互联网控制政策是否根据现行政治制度的类型而有所不同。这项研究选择了五个拉丁美洲国家,它们被归类为不同政治制度的例子:智利、墨西哥、厄瓜多尔、委内瑞拉和古巴。对于每一种情况,与互联网上言论自由有关的指标都是根据《民主的种类》提供的数据进行报告的。«网络自由»分类是作为补充使用的。结果表明,政体(以多元政治指数衡量)与互联网自由之间存在相关性。事实上,一个政权越专制,第一代互联网管制就越严格,包括内容审查和侵犯用户权利。而在混合制度下,第二代控制更常见,这涉及到访问障碍,而没有达到内容封锁和网络中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信