{"title":"The Shāhīn Affair and the Evolution of uṣūl al-tafsīr","authors":"Sohaib Saeed","doi":"10.3366/jqs.2019.0401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1997, the distinguished linguistics professor ʿAbd al-Ṣabūr Shāhīn of Cairo University published his re-reading of the story of creation, entitled Abī Ādam (‘My Father Adam’). Although the book created a storm of refutations, televised debates, and a blasphemy charge against the author, the Islamic Research Council of al-Azhar University concluded that the book was flawed but not blasphemous. This paper sheds light on Shāhīn's key strategies in arguing for an evolutionary reading of the Qur'an, in which Adam was the first full human (insān) endowed with divine spirit, but born on earth to hominid parents (bashar). Responses by two other linguist scholars, ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm Ibrāhīm al-Maṭʿanī of al-Azhar and Ḥamza b. Qublān al-Muzaynī of King Saud University, illustrate the contemporary underdevelopment of Qur'anic hermeneutics (uṣūl al-tafsīr) as a discipline. The paper draws attention to current scholarly developments in the Muslim world and the move from refutations to constructive accounts based on tradition.","PeriodicalId":43884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quranic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quranic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2019.0401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
In 1997, the distinguished linguistics professor ʿAbd al-Ṣabūr Shāhīn of Cairo University published his re-reading of the story of creation, entitled Abī Ādam (‘My Father Adam’). Although the book created a storm of refutations, televised debates, and a blasphemy charge against the author, the Islamic Research Council of al-Azhar University concluded that the book was flawed but not blasphemous. This paper sheds light on Shāhīn's key strategies in arguing for an evolutionary reading of the Qur'an, in which Adam was the first full human (insān) endowed with divine spirit, but born on earth to hominid parents (bashar). Responses by two other linguist scholars, ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm Ibrāhīm al-Maṭʿanī of al-Azhar and Ḥamza b. Qublān al-Muzaynī of King Saud University, illustrate the contemporary underdevelopment of Qur'anic hermeneutics (uṣūl al-tafsīr) as a discipline. The paper draws attention to current scholarly developments in the Muslim world and the move from refutations to constructive accounts based on tradition.
1997年,开罗大学著名语言学教授阿卜杜拉·阿尔-Ṣabūr Shāhīn发表了他对创世故事的重新解读,题为《阿卜杜拉·Ādam》(“我的父亲亚当”)。尽管这本书引发了激烈的反驳、电视辩论和对作者的亵渎指控,但爱资哈尔大学伊斯兰研究委员会(Islamic Research Council of al-Azhar University)的结论是,这本书有缺陷,但没有亵渎。这篇论文阐明了Shāhīn在争论《古兰经》的进化解读时的关键策略,其中亚当是第一个被赋予神圣精神的完整人类(insān),但出生在地球上的父母是原始人(bashar)。另外两位语言学家学者,爱资哈尔大学的al- Abd al- - - Aẓīm Ibrāhīm al- maha - - anyi和沙特国王大学的Ḥamza b. Qublān al- muzaynyi的回答说明了古兰经解释学(uṣūl al-tafs - r)作为一门学科的当代发展不足。本文提请注意当前穆斯林世界的学术发展,以及从反驳到基于传统的建设性叙述的转变。