The effect of subbranch for the quantification of local hemodynamic environment in the coronary artery: a computed tomography angiography–based computational fluid dynamic analysis

Yibing Shi, Jin Zheng, N. Yang, Yang Chen, Jingxi Sun, Ying Zhang, Xuanxuan Zhou, Yongguang Gao, Suqing Li, Haijing Zhu, J. Acosta-Cabronero, P. Xia, Z. Teng
{"title":"The effect of subbranch for the quantification of local hemodynamic environment in the coronary artery: a computed tomography angiography–based computational fluid dynamic analysis","authors":"Yibing Shi, Jin Zheng, N. Yang, Yang Chen, Jingxi Sun, Ying Zhang, Xuanxuan Zhou, Yongguang Gao, Suqing Li, Haijing Zhu, J. Acosta-Cabronero, P. Xia, Z. Teng","doi":"10.1097/EC9.0000000000000062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Hemodynamic parameters derived from computed tomography angiography–based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis have been widely used for clinical decision-making and researches to assess the vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques and explain the initialization and development of atherosclerosis. Subbranches in the CFD model might affect the accuracy of hemodynamic parameters, but the effectiveness has been least quantified. Methods A coronary artery baseline model was generated with focal stenosis at the proximal left anterior descending artery. Nineteen comparing models were created by systematically removing various subbranches to examine the changes in hemodynamic parameters, including time-averaged pressure (TAP), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and particle relative residence time (RRT). Changes in these parameters were assessed quantitatively around the stenosis and near the region where subbranches were removed. Results The removal of subbranches caused a significant change in outflow rate, and there was generally a decrease in all CFD parameters in the regions of interest with a decrease in outflow rate. The subbranch removal had a significant impact on the calculation of TAWSS, OSI, and RRT, whereas TAP was insensitive to the removal with approximately 0.25% variation in all 19 models. The local effect from removing branch segments generally became negligible after 5 diameters away from the cutting-off position, but the decrease could be affected by other factors, such as a large curvature. Conclusion The outflow rate is a dominant factor for the calculation of TAP, TAWSS, OSI, and RRT. Removal of subbranches has a minor effect on the TAP calculation, but its effect is considerable on the TAWSS, OSI, and RRT. The effect of subbranch removal is limited in a region with 5 local diameters.","PeriodicalId":72895,"journal":{"name":"Emergency and critical care medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"181 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background Hemodynamic parameters derived from computed tomography angiography–based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis have been widely used for clinical decision-making and researches to assess the vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques and explain the initialization and development of atherosclerosis. Subbranches in the CFD model might affect the accuracy of hemodynamic parameters, but the effectiveness has been least quantified. Methods A coronary artery baseline model was generated with focal stenosis at the proximal left anterior descending artery. Nineteen comparing models were created by systematically removing various subbranches to examine the changes in hemodynamic parameters, including time-averaged pressure (TAP), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and particle relative residence time (RRT). Changes in these parameters were assessed quantitatively around the stenosis and near the region where subbranches were removed. Results The removal of subbranches caused a significant change in outflow rate, and there was generally a decrease in all CFD parameters in the regions of interest with a decrease in outflow rate. The subbranch removal had a significant impact on the calculation of TAWSS, OSI, and RRT, whereas TAP was insensitive to the removal with approximately 0.25% variation in all 19 models. The local effect from removing branch segments generally became negligible after 5 diameters away from the cutting-off position, but the decrease could be affected by other factors, such as a large curvature. Conclusion The outflow rate is a dominant factor for the calculation of TAP, TAWSS, OSI, and RRT. Removal of subbranches has a minor effect on the TAP calculation, but its effect is considerable on the TAWSS, OSI, and RRT. The effect of subbranch removal is limited in a region with 5 local diameters.
分支对冠状动脉局部血流动力学环境定量的影响:基于计算机断层血管造影的计算流体动力学分析
基于计算机断层血管造影的计算流体动力学(CFD)分析得到的血流动力学参数已被广泛用于临床决策和研究,以评估动脉粥样硬化斑块的易损性,并解释动脉粥样硬化的初始和发展。CFD模型中的分支可能会影响血流动力学参数的准确性,但其有效性量化最少。方法建立左前降支近端局灶性狭窄的冠状动脉基线模型。通过系统地去除各种分支,建立了19个比较模型,以检查血流动力学参数的变化,包括时间平均压力(TAP)、时间平均壁面剪切应力(TAWSS)、振荡剪切指数(OSI)和颗粒相对停留时间(RRT)。这些参数的变化在狭窄周围和分支被切除的区域附近被定量评估。结果分支的移除引起了流出率的显著变化,随着流出率的降低,感兴趣区域的所有CFD参数普遍降低。分支去除对TAWSS、OSI和RRT的计算有显著影响,而TAP对去除不敏感,在所有19个模型中变化约为0.25%。在距离切断位置5个直径后,去除分支段的局部影响通常可以忽略不计,但减少可能受到其他因素的影响,例如大曲率。结论流出率是计算TAP、TAWSS、OSI和RRT的主导因素。删除子分支对TAP计算的影响较小,但对TAWSS、OSI和RRT的影响相当大。分支去除的效果在局部直径为5的区域内受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信