Towards holistic goal centered performance management in software development: lessons from a best practice analysis

IF 2.2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
T. Murphy, K. Cormican
{"title":"Towards holistic goal centered performance management in software development: lessons from a best practice analysis","authors":"T. Murphy, K. Cormican","doi":"10.12821/IJISPM030402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are strong motivating factors for more effective performance measurement practices in software development. Astute practices in this domain are lauded to improve efficiency and effectiveness. However previous studies have shown that measurement in software is intricate, complex and fraught with challenges. Consequently it is poorly managed in practice. Our research seeks to better understand performance management in a real world software development setting in order to identify the challenges and generate a roadmap for improvement. This paper presents findings from an inductive analysis of a radical measurement program in a global software organization. Our study investigates the level at which non-compliance with best practice can explain the company’s disappointing results. We found that a narrow focus on projects, rather than on organizational goals, has seriously hindered its success. We also found that the rate of change in the organization as a whole was impinging on the effective implementation of its measurement program. An analysis of the results demonstrates just how challenging software measurement is. The findings provide an evaluation of best practice relative to the literature that is informed by real industry experience.","PeriodicalId":43984,"journal":{"name":"IJISPM-International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJISPM-International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12821/IJISPM030402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

There are strong motivating factors for more effective performance measurement practices in software development. Astute practices in this domain are lauded to improve efficiency and effectiveness. However previous studies have shown that measurement in software is intricate, complex and fraught with challenges. Consequently it is poorly managed in practice. Our research seeks to better understand performance management in a real world software development setting in order to identify the challenges and generate a roadmap for improvement. This paper presents findings from an inductive analysis of a radical measurement program in a global software organization. Our study investigates the level at which non-compliance with best practice can explain the company’s disappointing results. We found that a narrow focus on projects, rather than on organizational goals, has seriously hindered its success. We also found that the rate of change in the organization as a whole was impinging on the effective implementation of its measurement program. An analysis of the results demonstrates just how challenging software measurement is. The findings provide an evaluation of best practice relative to the literature that is informed by real industry experience.
软件开发中以目标为中心的整体绩效管理:最佳实践分析的经验教训
在软件开发中,对于更有效的性能度量实践有很强的激励因素。在这个领域中,精明的实践被称赞可以提高效率和效果。然而,先前的研究表明,软件中的度量是错综复杂的,充满了挑战。因此,它在实践中管理不善。我们的研究旨在更好地理解现实世界软件开发环境中的性能管理,以便识别挑战并生成改进路线图。本文介绍了对一个全球性软件组织的激进测量程序进行归纳分析的结果。我们的研究调查了不遵守最佳实践在何种程度上可以解释公司令人失望的结果。我们发现,对项目的狭隘关注,而不是对组织目标的关注,严重阻碍了它的成功。我们还发现,整个组织的变化率影响着其度量程序的有效实施。对结果的分析表明软件度量是多么具有挑战性。研究结果提供了与文献相关的最佳实践评估,这些文献是由真实的行业经验提供的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信