On the Dangers of Transnational Influences of Western Psychology: Decolonizing International Perspectives on Women and Therapy

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Oksana Yakushko
{"title":"On the Dangers of Transnational Influences of Western Psychology: Decolonizing International Perspectives on Women and Therapy","authors":"Oksana Yakushko","doi":"10.1080/02703149.2020.1776018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Psychology of women, feminist psychology, and therapy with women have been primarily connected to dominant Western methodologies and practices of the Global North. The history of misogynistic and patriarchal methods in Western psychology is often limited to critiques of psychoanalysis, even though international and multicultural critical perspectives continue to draw primarily on psychoanalytic theoretical and clinical modalities. The history of colonization, eugenics, and imperialism are routinely minimized or denied in accounts of psychologies of the Global North, while indigenous and non-Western and Global South traditions are fetishized and appropriated without critical analysis. The dangers of colonization of global impact, especially on psychologies not associated with industrialized worlds of the Global North, are noted in relation to dominant psychology’s insistence on neutral experimental research, reduction of human experiences to biology and animal behavior, the privileging of methods of thought and behavior control, and ethnocentric assumptions about the superiority of Western contributions of the Global North. Possibilities of critical and liberatory practices in relation to the practice of psychology with women with connections to global non-Western cultures are explored. This article concludes with a personal narrative about the dangers and limitations of the uncritical export of dominant psychologies of the Global North.","PeriodicalId":46696,"journal":{"name":"Women & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02703149.2020.1776018","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1776018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Psychology of women, feminist psychology, and therapy with women have been primarily connected to dominant Western methodologies and practices of the Global North. The history of misogynistic and patriarchal methods in Western psychology is often limited to critiques of psychoanalysis, even though international and multicultural critical perspectives continue to draw primarily on psychoanalytic theoretical and clinical modalities. The history of colonization, eugenics, and imperialism are routinely minimized or denied in accounts of psychologies of the Global North, while indigenous and non-Western and Global South traditions are fetishized and appropriated without critical analysis. The dangers of colonization of global impact, especially on psychologies not associated with industrialized worlds of the Global North, are noted in relation to dominant psychology’s insistence on neutral experimental research, reduction of human experiences to biology and animal behavior, the privileging of methods of thought and behavior control, and ethnocentric assumptions about the superiority of Western contributions of the Global North. Possibilities of critical and liberatory practices in relation to the practice of psychology with women with connections to global non-Western cultures are explored. This article concludes with a personal narrative about the dangers and limitations of the uncritical export of dominant psychologies of the Global North.
论西方心理学跨国影响的危险:对女性和治疗的非殖民化国际视角
女性心理学、女权主义心理学和女性治疗主要与全球北方占主导地位的西方方法和实践有关。西方心理学中厌恶女性和父权方法的历史往往局限于对精神分析的批评,尽管国际和多元文化的批评观点继续主要借鉴精神分析的理论和临床模式。在全球北方的心理学中,殖民、优生学和帝国主义的历史通常被最小化或否认,而本土的、非西方的和全球南方的传统被盲目崇拜和挪用,而没有进行批判性的分析。全球影响的殖民化的危险,特别是对与全球北方工业化世界无关的心理学的危险,与主流心理学对中立实验研究的坚持,将人类经验减少到生物学和动物行为,思想和行为控制方法的特权,以及关于全球北方西方贡献优越性的种族中心主义假设有关。探讨了与全球非西方文化联系的女性心理学实践相关的批判性和解放实践的可能性。本文以个人叙述的方式总结了不加批判地输出全球北方主导心理学的危险和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Women & Therapy
Women & Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Women & Therapy is the only professional journal that focuses entirely on the complex interrelationship between women and the therapeutic experience. Devoted to descriptive, theoretical, clinical, and empirical perspectives on the topic of women and therapy, the journal is intended for feminist practitioners as well as for individuals interested in the practice of feminist therapy. The journal focuses on a wide range of content areas, including: •issues in the process of therapy with female clients •problems in living that affect women in greater proportion than men, such as depression, eating disorders, and agoraphobia •women"s traditional and nontraditional roles in society and how these affect and can be affected by therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信