Antibiotic resistance pattern of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from children with symptomatic urinary tract infection in Moscow, Russia

Q2 Veterinary
Souadkia Sarra, M. Arsène, V. E. Grigorievna, Podoprigora Irina Victorovna, Y. N. Vyacheslavovna, Borechova Marina Nikolaïevna
{"title":"Antibiotic resistance pattern of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from children with symptomatic urinary tract infection in Moscow, Russia","authors":"Souadkia Sarra, M. Arsène, V. E. Grigorievna, Podoprigora Irina Victorovna, Y. N. Vyacheslavovna, Borechova Marina Nikolaïevna","doi":"10.14202/ijoh.2021.212-219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is commonly involved in urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are generally treated with antibiotics. However, the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of UPEC has made the treatment difficult. There is thus a need to continuously assess their sensitivity to antibiotics. This study aimed to determine the antibiotic resistance patterns and MDR phenotypes of UPEC strains isolated from children diagnosed with UTIs at the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital in Moscow, Russia.\n\nMaterials and Methods: Kirby–Bauer's disc diffusion method was used to study the sensitivity to antibiotics of 106 UPEC isolates from urine specimens from children (aged from 9 months to 18 years old) diagnosed with UTIs. The results were interpreted in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and the correlations of variables with the degree to which each antibiotic inhibited the UPEC strains in terms of diameter on the disc were determined using Spearman's rank correlation test. A t-test and principal component analysis were performed to visualize the correlations of the susceptibility of UPEC to antibiotics with the age and sex of the patients. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05.\n\nResults: Among the 106 UPEC strains tested, none (0%) showed resistance to fosfomycin (FO), while 84 (79.2%) were resistant (R) to at least one antibiotic. The highest rates of resistance were observed to amoxicillin (69.8%), ampicillin (62.3%), cefazolin (39.6%), trimethoprim (TR) (37.7%), ceftriaxone (34.9%), and tetracycline (33.0%). Interestingly, 22 (20.8%) strains were R to imipenem. UPEC isolates from males aged 1-6 years were more R to antibiotics than those from the other groups, with the exception of TR, to which UPEC isolates from females aged 13-18 years old were less sensitive (S). The multidrug-resistance (MDR) index ranged between 0.00 and 0.75 and we found that more than a quarter of UPEC (31/106) had an MDR index ≥0.5 and only 22 (20.7%) strains were S to all antibiotics tested (MDR index=0). Finally, Spearman's rank correlation test showed that, with the exception of FO, there were correlations between the inhibition diameters of all other antibiotics.\n\nConclusion: FO is the only antibiotic to which all UPECs were S and may be suggested as the first line of treatment for UPEC. Further research is needed to continue monitoring antibiotic resistance and to investigate the genetic features associated with such resistance observed in this study.","PeriodicalId":37300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of One Health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14202/ijoh.2021.212-219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is commonly involved in urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are generally treated with antibiotics. However, the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of UPEC has made the treatment difficult. There is thus a need to continuously assess their sensitivity to antibiotics. This study aimed to determine the antibiotic resistance patterns and MDR phenotypes of UPEC strains isolated from children diagnosed with UTIs at the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital in Moscow, Russia. Materials and Methods: Kirby–Bauer's disc diffusion method was used to study the sensitivity to antibiotics of 106 UPEC isolates from urine specimens from children (aged from 9 months to 18 years old) diagnosed with UTIs. The results were interpreted in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and the correlations of variables with the degree to which each antibiotic inhibited the UPEC strains in terms of diameter on the disc were determined using Spearman's rank correlation test. A t-test and principal component analysis were performed to visualize the correlations of the susceptibility of UPEC to antibiotics with the age and sex of the patients. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05. Results: Among the 106 UPEC strains tested, none (0%) showed resistance to fosfomycin (FO), while 84 (79.2%) were resistant (R) to at least one antibiotic. The highest rates of resistance were observed to amoxicillin (69.8%), ampicillin (62.3%), cefazolin (39.6%), trimethoprim (TR) (37.7%), ceftriaxone (34.9%), and tetracycline (33.0%). Interestingly, 22 (20.8%) strains were R to imipenem. UPEC isolates from males aged 1-6 years were more R to antibiotics than those from the other groups, with the exception of TR, to which UPEC isolates from females aged 13-18 years old were less sensitive (S). The multidrug-resistance (MDR) index ranged between 0.00 and 0.75 and we found that more than a quarter of UPEC (31/106) had an MDR index ≥0.5 and only 22 (20.7%) strains were S to all antibiotics tested (MDR index=0). Finally, Spearman's rank correlation test showed that, with the exception of FO, there were correlations between the inhibition diameters of all other antibiotics. Conclusion: FO is the only antibiotic to which all UPECs were S and may be suggested as the first line of treatment for UPEC. Further research is needed to continue monitoring antibiotic resistance and to investigate the genetic features associated with such resistance observed in this study.
俄罗斯莫斯科症状性尿路感染儿童尿路致病性大肠杆菌的耐药性模式
背景和目的:尿路致病性大肠杆菌(UPEC)通常与尿路感染(UTIs)有关,通常使用抗生素治疗。然而,UPEC耐多药菌株的出现使治疗变得困难。因此,需要不断评估它们对抗生素的敏感性。本研究旨在确定从莫斯科俄罗斯儿童临床医院诊断为尿路感染的儿童中分离的UPEC菌株的抗生素耐药性模式和MDR表型,俄罗斯。材料和方法:使用Kirby–Bauer椎间盘扩散法研究了106个UPEC分离株对抗生素的敏感性,这些分离株来自诊断为尿路感染的儿童(9个月至18岁)的尿液样本。根据临床和实验室标准研究所指南对结果进行解释,并使用Spearman秩相关检验确定变量与每种抗生素在椎间盘上抑制UPEC菌株的程度的相关性。进行t检验和主成分分析,以显示UPEC对抗生素的易感性与患者年龄和性别的相关性。结果:在106株UPEC菌株中,没有一株(0%)对磷霉素(FO)产生耐药性,84株(79.2%)对至少一种抗生素产生耐药性。阿莫西林(69.8%)、氨苄青霉素(62.3%)、头孢唑林(39.6%)、甲氧苄啶(37.7%)、头孢曲松(34.9%)和四环素(33.0%)耐药率最高。来自1-6岁男性的UPEC分离株比来自其他组的UPEC对抗生素的R更高,但TR除外,来自13-18岁女性的UPEC隔离株对抗生素的敏感性较低(S)。多药耐药性(MDR)指数在0.00至0.75之间,我们发现超过四分之一的UPEC(31/106)的MDR指数≥0.5,只有22株(20.7%)菌株对所有测试的抗生素呈S(MDR指数=0)。最后,Spearman秩相关检验表明,除FO外,所有其他抗生素的抑制直径之间都存在相关性。结论:FO是唯一一种UPEC均为S的抗生素,可作为UPEC的一线治疗药物。需要进一步的研究来继续监测抗生素耐药性,并调查本研究中观察到的与这种耐药性相关的遗传特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of One Health
International Journal of One Health Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of One Health publishes high quality and novelty papers focusing on One Health. Review articles are highly appreciated. All articles published by International Journal of One Health are made freely and permanently accessible online. All articles to International Journal of One Health are posted online immediately as they are ready for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信