Article: The Contribution of Geopolitics to the Study of EU Foreign Policy Illustrated Through the Example of Empires and Colonialism

L. Lonardo
{"title":"Article: The Contribution of Geopolitics to the Study of EU Foreign Policy Illustrated Through the Example of Empires and Colonialism","authors":"L. Lonardo","doi":"10.54648/eerr2022031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents some theoretical reflections, and one empirical case study, on the contribution of geopolitics to the study of EU foreign policy. The article asks in particular how geopolitics can contribute to causal explanation in foreign policy. First, the article identifies and discusses two problems with a crude, early version of geopolitics: arbitrariness in the measurement of dependent and independent variables, and spurious causation. Second, drawing from concepts developed by rational choice theorists, the article argues that geopolitics can prove insightful in at least two ways. The first way in which geopolitics can establish causal explanations is when it studies how geography provides opportunity to act, that is, options for a political actor. The second way in which geopolitics is useful is that it can establish causality through negation (an event was prevented, or made more difficult, by geographical features). Both ways are illustrated through the example of empires and colonialism and their influence over EU foreign policy.\nEU foreign policy, Geopolitics, Methodology, Political geography, Empire","PeriodicalId":84710,"journal":{"name":"European foreign affairs review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European foreign affairs review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2022031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents some theoretical reflections, and one empirical case study, on the contribution of geopolitics to the study of EU foreign policy. The article asks in particular how geopolitics can contribute to causal explanation in foreign policy. First, the article identifies and discusses two problems with a crude, early version of geopolitics: arbitrariness in the measurement of dependent and independent variables, and spurious causation. Second, drawing from concepts developed by rational choice theorists, the article argues that geopolitics can prove insightful in at least two ways. The first way in which geopolitics can establish causal explanations is when it studies how geography provides opportunity to act, that is, options for a political actor. The second way in which geopolitics is useful is that it can establish causality through negation (an event was prevented, or made more difficult, by geographical features). Both ways are illustrated through the example of empires and colonialism and their influence over EU foreign policy. EU foreign policy, Geopolitics, Methodology, Political geography, Empire
文章:地缘政治对欧盟外交政策研究的贡献——以帝国和殖民主义为例
本文就地缘政治对欧盟外交政策研究的贡献提出了一些理论思考和一个实证案例研究。这篇文章特别提出了地缘政治如何有助于外交政策的因果解释。首先,文章识别并讨论了地缘政治的两个粗糙的、早期版本的问题:测量因变量和自变量的随意性,以及虚假的因果关系。其次,根据理性选择理论家提出的概念,文章认为地缘政治至少可以在两个方面证明是有洞察力的。地缘政治可以建立因果解释的第一种方式是研究地理如何提供行动机会,即政治行动者的选择。地缘政治有用的第二种方式是,它可以通过否定来建立因果关系(地理特征阻止了某一事件的发生,或使其变得更加困难)。这两种方式都可以通过帝国和殖民主义及其对欧盟外交政策的影响的例子来说明。欧盟外交政策,地缘政治,方法论,政治地理,帝国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信