Brands make believe: ethical veganism and labelling in fashion

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
J. Gibson
{"title":"Brands make believe: ethical veganism and labelling in fashion","authors":"J. Gibson","doi":"10.4337/qmjip.2020.02.00","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In January this year, in Casamitjana Costa v The League Against Cruel Sports, the Employment Tribunal held that ethical veganism is a philosophical belief under section 10 of the Equality Act 2010. This preliminary ruling on veganism was part of an unfair dismissal case, in which the claimant maintained that he was dismissed because of his ethical veganism. Although as a first instance decision it is merely persuasive on subsequent tribunals, the case has attracted wide publicity and any decision seeking to depart from it would likely be viewed as quite controversial without providing good reasons to distinguish itself. While some may say that the decision does not technically change the law, this is just half the story. Indeed, in many respects it changes everything.","PeriodicalId":42155,"journal":{"name":"Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4337/qmjip.2020.02.00","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2020.02.00","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In January this year, in Casamitjana Costa v The League Against Cruel Sports, the Employment Tribunal held that ethical veganism is a philosophical belief under section 10 of the Equality Act 2010. This preliminary ruling on veganism was part of an unfair dismissal case, in which the claimant maintained that he was dismissed because of his ethical veganism. Although as a first instance decision it is merely persuasive on subsequent tribunals, the case has attracted wide publicity and any decision seeking to depart from it would likely be viewed as quite controversial without providing good reasons to distinguish itself. While some may say that the decision does not technically change the law, this is just half the story. Indeed, in many respects it changes everything.
品牌虚构:道德素食主义与时尚标签
今年1月,在Casamitjana Costa诉反残酷运动联盟一案中,就业法庭裁定,根据2010年《平等法》第10条,道德素食主义是一种哲学信仰。这个关于素食主义的初步裁决是一个不公平解雇案的一部分,在这个案件中,原告坚持认为他被解雇是因为他的道德素食主义。虽然作为一审判决,它在随后的法庭上仅具有说服力,但此案已引起广泛关注,任何试图偏离它的判决都可能被视为相当有争议,没有提供充分的理由来区分自己。虽然有些人可能会说,从技术上讲,这一决定并没有改变法律,但这只是故事的一半。的确,在许多方面,它改变了一切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信