Analysis of youtube videos related to interproximal reduction

E. Özkan, Şirin Hatipoğlu
{"title":"Analysis of youtube videos related to interproximal reduction","authors":"E. Özkan, Şirin Hatipoğlu","doi":"10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_60_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the quality and accuracy of the information provided by YouTube™ videos on interproximal reduction (IPR). Materials and Methods: A systematic exploration of YouTube™ videos about IPR was collected using the search word “IPR” from the Google Trends application. The first 200 videos were viewed and 131 videos were incorporated in the study. The video content was scored using 12-point score scale, which was used for the classification of low-, moderate-, and high-content video groups. The Kruskal–Wallis test, post hoc Bonferroni test, and multinomial logistic regression analysis were used. Spearman's correlation was used for statistical evaluations. Results: We graded videos as low (59.5%), moderate (37.4%), and high (3.1%) content. Health professionals uploaded most of the videos (52.7%). “Procedure” (87%) was the most mentioned topic, while “oral hygiene instructions” (1.5%) was the least mentioned. The moderate-content scores of “Procedure,” “Duration in minutes,” “Flow of information,” “Quality,” and “Precision” were found to be statistically higher than the low-content scores. The video information and quality index total scores were found to be significantly higher in the moderate-score than the low-score group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The content of videos with IPR on YouTube™ is insufficient. It is important for the specialist who will perform the IPR procedure to be aware of the available information on the internet to direct their patients to access the correct information.","PeriodicalId":31325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research and Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"165 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_60_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the quality and accuracy of the information provided by YouTube™ videos on interproximal reduction (IPR). Materials and Methods: A systematic exploration of YouTube™ videos about IPR was collected using the search word “IPR” from the Google Trends application. The first 200 videos were viewed and 131 videos were incorporated in the study. The video content was scored using 12-point score scale, which was used for the classification of low-, moderate-, and high-content video groups. The Kruskal–Wallis test, post hoc Bonferroni test, and multinomial logistic regression analysis were used. Spearman's correlation was used for statistical evaluations. Results: We graded videos as low (59.5%), moderate (37.4%), and high (3.1%) content. Health professionals uploaded most of the videos (52.7%). “Procedure” (87%) was the most mentioned topic, while “oral hygiene instructions” (1.5%) was the least mentioned. The moderate-content scores of “Procedure,” “Duration in minutes,” “Flow of information,” “Quality,” and “Precision” were found to be statistically higher than the low-content scores. The video information and quality index total scores were found to be significantly higher in the moderate-score than the low-score group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The content of videos with IPR on YouTube™ is insufficient. It is important for the specialist who will perform the IPR procedure to be aware of the available information on the internet to direct their patients to access the correct information.
youtube视频与邻区缩小相关的分析
目的:本研究的目的是评估YouTube™视频提供的近端间复位(IPR)信息的质量和准确性。材料与方法:在谷歌Trends应用程序中搜索“IPR”,对YouTube™中有关IPR的视频进行系统的检索。前200个视频被观看,131个视频被纳入研究。视频内容采用12分制评分,用于低、中、高内容视频组的分类。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、事后Bonferroni检验和多项logistic回归分析。Spearman相关被用于统计评估。结果:我们将视频分为低(59.5%)、中(37.4%)和高(3.1%)三个等级。卫生专业人员上传的视频最多(52.7%)。“手术”(87%)是被提及最多的话题,而“口腔卫生指导”(1.5%)被提及最少。中等内容的“程序”、“持续时间(分钟)”、“信息流”、“质量”和“精度”得分在统计上高于低内容的得分。中等评分组的视频信息和质量指标总分显著高于低评分组(P < 0.05)。结论:YouTube™上的知识产权视频内容不足。对于执行知识产权程序的专家来说,了解互联网上可用的信息以指导患者获取正确的信息是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书