Mothers’ Perceptions of their Daughters’ Susceptibility to HPV-related Risk Factors: An Experimental Pretest Comparing Narrative and Statistical Risk Information

M. Pot, Hilde M. van Keulen, Theo Paulussen, Wilma Otten, JIm Van Steenbergen, R. Ruiter
{"title":"Mothers’ Perceptions of their Daughters’ Susceptibility to HPV-related Risk Factors: An Experimental Pretest Comparing Narrative and Statistical Risk Information","authors":"M. Pot, Hilde M. van Keulen, Theo Paulussen, Wilma Otten, JIm Van Steenbergen, R. Ruiter","doi":"10.5334/HPB.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In order to promote HPV-vaccination acceptability among mothers of invited girls, we developed a web-based, tailored intervention. This study reports on an experimental pretest for the component of this intervention targeting mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility towards HPV-related risk factors. Statistical versus narrative risk information was pretested as research results remain to be mixed on the surplus value of one type over the other in influencing mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility. Methods: We used data from 375 mothers of girls-to-be invited to the HPV-vaccination round 2014, who were derived from the Dutch National Immunization Register. They were randomly assigned to one of four conditions in a 2 (statistical information: yes or no) × 2 (narrative information: yes or no) between-subjects factorial design. Findings: Mothers who received statistical information felt their daughters were more susceptible towards HPV than mothers who received no statistical information. No main or interaction effects with narrative information were found. The effect of statistical information on mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility towards HPV was not moderated by perceived comprehensibility, credibility or novelty of the risk information, nor mediated by message-induced imaginability, elaboration, personal relevance, or defensive reactions. However, in secondary analyses, in which we only included the statistical and narrative condition, we found personal relevance to mediate the effect of statistical information (independent variable) on mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility towards HPV (dependent variable). Discussion: Statistical risk information appeared most effective in increasing mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility towards HPV and was therefore included in the web-based, tailored intervention promoting HPV-vaccination acceptability.","PeriodicalId":92902,"journal":{"name":"Health psychology bulletin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health psychology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/HPB.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: In order to promote HPV-vaccination acceptability among mothers of invited girls, we developed a web-based, tailored intervention. This study reports on an experimental pretest for the component of this intervention targeting mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility towards HPV-related risk factors. Statistical versus narrative risk information was pretested as research results remain to be mixed on the surplus value of one type over the other in influencing mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility. Methods: We used data from 375 mothers of girls-to-be invited to the HPV-vaccination round 2014, who were derived from the Dutch National Immunization Register. They were randomly assigned to one of four conditions in a 2 (statistical information: yes or no) × 2 (narrative information: yes or no) between-subjects factorial design. Findings: Mothers who received statistical information felt their daughters were more susceptible towards HPV than mothers who received no statistical information. No main or interaction effects with narrative information were found. The effect of statistical information on mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility towards HPV was not moderated by perceived comprehensibility, credibility or novelty of the risk information, nor mediated by message-induced imaginability, elaboration, personal relevance, or defensive reactions. However, in secondary analyses, in which we only included the statistical and narrative condition, we found personal relevance to mediate the effect of statistical information (independent variable) on mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility towards HPV (dependent variable). Discussion: Statistical risk information appeared most effective in increasing mothers’ perceptions of their daughters’ susceptibility towards HPV and was therefore included in the web-based, tailored intervention promoting HPV-vaccination acceptability.
母亲对女儿HPV相关危险因素易感性的感知:一项比较叙述和统计风险信息的实验性预测试
背景:为了促进被邀请女孩的母亲接受hpv疫苗接种,我们开发了一种基于网络的量身定制的干预措施。本研究报告了一项针对母亲对其女儿对hpv相关危险因素易感性的干预成分的实验性预测试。统计风险信息与叙述风险信息进行了预测试,因为研究结果在影响母亲对女儿易感性的看法方面,一种类型的剩余价值比另一种类型的剩余价值仍然存在差异。方法:我们使用了来自荷兰国家免疫登记的375名受邀参加2014年hpv疫苗接种的准妈妈的数据。在2(统计信息:是或否)× 2(叙述信息:是或否)受试者间因子设计中,他们被随机分配到四种条件中的一种。研究结果:得到统计信息的母亲认为她们的女儿比没有得到统计信息的母亲更容易感染HPV。没有发现叙事信息的主效应或交互效应。统计信息对母亲对女儿HPV易感性认知的影响不受风险信息的可理解性、可信度或新颖性的影响,也不受信息诱导的可想象性、阐述、个人相关性或防御反应的影响。然而,在次要分析中,我们只包括统计和叙述条件,我们发现个人相关性可以调解统计信息(自变量)对母亲对女儿对HPV易感性的看法(因变量)的影响。讨论:统计风险信息似乎在提高母亲对其女儿对HPV易感性的认识方面最有效,因此被纳入基于网络的定制干预措施,以促进HPV疫苗的可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信