Herodian and Severan Historiography

IF 0.6 1区历史学 0 CLASSICS

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1353/ajp.2023.a899838

Andrew G. Scott

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This paper examines the historiographic controversies and disagreements surrounding the figure of Septimius Severus and highlighted by Herodian in his Roman History as a means of investigating the development of history writing during and in the aftermath of that emperor's reign. Herodian cites Severus' transition to power and reign as a locus for historical and historiographical controversy and debate, and a comparison of Herodian with other Severan writers allows for an examination of Herodian's competitive relationship with his older historiographic peers and of the innovative aspects of his work that set it apart from others.

查看原文本刊更多论文

希律与塞韦兰史学

摘要:本文考察了希律王在其《罗马史》中所强调的塞普提米乌斯·塞维鲁(Septimius Severus)这一人物在史学上的争议和分歧，以此作为考察希律王在位期间及其后历史写作发展的一种手段。希律书引用西弗勒斯的权力过渡和统治作为历史和史学争议和辩论的焦点，希律书与其他西弗勒作家的比较允许希律书与他的老历史同行的竞争关系和他的工作的创新方面，使其与众不同。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1880, American Journal of Philology (AJP) has helped to shape American classical scholarship. Today, the Journal has achieved worldwide recognition as a forum for international exchange among classicists and philologists by publishing original research in classical literature, philology, linguistics, history, society, religion, philosophy, and cultural and material studies. Book review sections are featured in every issue. AJP is open to a wide variety of contemporary and interdisciplinary approaches, including literary interpretation and theory, historical investigation, and textual criticism.