Role of prophylactic fresh frozen plasma in critically ill neonate to prevent bleeding in disseminated intravascular coagulation: a randomized controlled trial

Q4 Medicine
Nusrat Kamal, M. Al Mamun, M. M. Hossain
{"title":"Role of prophylactic fresh frozen plasma in critically ill neonate to prevent bleeding in disseminated intravascular coagulation: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Nusrat Kamal, M. Al Mamun, M. M. Hossain","doi":"10.3329/bmrcb.v48i2.62301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has a high prevalence in critically ill neonates. In suspicion of DIC based on abnormal coagulation parameter is a common trigger to transfuse fresh frozen plasma (FFP), even in absence of bleeding. In past years, use of FFP has increased and has expanded to include prophylactic use in neonates especially in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) as it contains several coagulation factors. Several studies suggest that, prophylactic use of FFP has no role to prevent bleeding in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), but carries increase risk of transfusion related mortality and morbidity.\nObjective: To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic use of FFP in critically ill neonate to prevent bleeding in DIC. Methods: This randomized, open-label, blinded end-point study was conducted in Bangladesh Institute of Child Health and Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital from July, 2019 to June, 2021. Term, critically ill neonates who had underlying disease, suspected to develop DIC were conveniently selected. Later, they were randomly allocated using software in intervention group, who received 10 ml/kg of FFP along with standard management and control group, who received only standard management. Coagulation parameters were checked before and 24 hour after intervention in both groups. Outcome was occurrence of bleeding as a indicator of DIC.\nResults: The mean age was 8.55 ± 3.5 days in intervention and 8.92 ± 6.1 days in control group. Male patients were predominant. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between two groups. The difference of mean ± SD of coagulation parameters between two groups were nonsignificant before intervention. Even after FFP transfusion, DIC developed among 40.1% neonates in intervention and without FFP transfusion among 48.9% neonates in control group without any significant difference (P-value >0.05).\nConclusion: Study result found no role of prophylactic use of FFP in critically ill neonate to prevent bleeding in DIC.\nBangladesh Medical Res Counc Bull 2022; 48: 146-153","PeriodicalId":8704,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v48i2.62301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has a high prevalence in critically ill neonates. In suspicion of DIC based on abnormal coagulation parameter is a common trigger to transfuse fresh frozen plasma (FFP), even in absence of bleeding. In past years, use of FFP has increased and has expanded to include prophylactic use in neonates especially in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) as it contains several coagulation factors. Several studies suggest that, prophylactic use of FFP has no role to prevent bleeding in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), but carries increase risk of transfusion related mortality and morbidity. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic use of FFP in critically ill neonate to prevent bleeding in DIC. Methods: This randomized, open-label, blinded end-point study was conducted in Bangladesh Institute of Child Health and Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital from July, 2019 to June, 2021. Term, critically ill neonates who had underlying disease, suspected to develop DIC were conveniently selected. Later, they were randomly allocated using software in intervention group, who received 10 ml/kg of FFP along with standard management and control group, who received only standard management. Coagulation parameters were checked before and 24 hour after intervention in both groups. Outcome was occurrence of bleeding as a indicator of DIC. Results: The mean age was 8.55 ± 3.5 days in intervention and 8.92 ± 6.1 days in control group. Male patients were predominant. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between two groups. The difference of mean ± SD of coagulation parameters between two groups were nonsignificant before intervention. Even after FFP transfusion, DIC developed among 40.1% neonates in intervention and without FFP transfusion among 48.9% neonates in control group without any significant difference (P-value >0.05). Conclusion: Study result found no role of prophylactic use of FFP in critically ill neonate to prevent bleeding in DIC. Bangladesh Medical Res Counc Bull 2022; 48: 146-153
预防性新鲜冷冻血浆在危重新生儿预防弥散性血管内凝血出血中的作用:一项随机对照试验
背景:弥漫性血管内凝血(DIC)在危重新生儿中有很高的患病率。基于异常凝血参数怀疑DIC是输注新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)的常见诱因,即使在没有出血的情况下也是如此。在过去的几年里,FFP的使用有所增加,并已扩大到包括新生儿的预防性使用,尤其是在新生儿重症监护室(NICU),因为它含有多种凝血因子。几项研究表明,预防性使用FFP对预防弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)出血没有作用,但会增加与输血相关的死亡率和发病率。目的:评价危重新生儿预防性应用FFP预防DIC出血的效果。方法:这项随机、开放标签、盲法终点研究于2019年7月至2021年6月在孟加拉国儿童健康研究所和达卡石树(儿童)医院进行。有潜在疾病、怀疑发展为DIC的足月危重新生儿被方便地选择。随后,使用软件将他们随机分配到干预组,干预组接受10ml/kg的FFP,标准管理组和对照组只接受标准管理。两组在干预前和干预后24小时检查凝血参数。结果:干预组平均年龄8.55±3.5天,对照组平均年龄8.92±6.1天。男性患者占主导地位。两组之间的基线特征没有显著差异。干预前两组凝血参数的平均值±标准差无显著性差异。即使在输注FFP后,干预组中40.1%的新生儿出现DIC,对照组中48.9%的新生儿在不输FFP的情况下出现DIC,没有任何显著差异(P值>0.05)。结论:研究结果发现,在危重新生儿中预防性使用FFP对预防DIC出血没有作用。Bangladesh Medical Res Counc Bull 2022;48:146-153
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The official publication of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信