Femoral Neck Preservation and Diaphyseal Invasion Comparing a Calcar-Metaphyseal Short Stem with its Homonymous Standard Femoral Stem. A Radiographic Study.

Q3 Medicine
Daniel Godoy-Monzon, Agustin Garcia-Mansilla, Felix Avendaño Duran, Javier Perez Torres, Jose Manuel Pascual Espinosa
{"title":"Femoral Neck Preservation and Diaphyseal Invasion Comparing a Calcar-Metaphyseal Short Stem with its Homonymous Standard Femoral Stem. A Radiographic Study.","authors":"Daniel Godoy-Monzon, Agustin Garcia-Mansilla, Felix Avendaño Duran, Javier Perez Torres, Jose Manuel Pascual Espinosa","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.7976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aim to compare the preoperative planning radiographs of 50 patients in whom both a short stem and its homonymous standard version were programmed, focusing on the preservation of the neck and the invasion of the femoral shaft. The secondary objective was to evaluate the 50 preoperative radiographs with the 50 postoperative radiographs in which the short stem was implanted, measuring the real invasion of the diaphysis and the real preservation of the femoral neck.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We measured cut level at the femoral neck and diaphyseal invasion in 50 preoperative x-rays where an Alteon Neck Preserving Stem (ANPS) was templated and we compared it with 50 preoperative x-rays where an Alteon Taper Wedge Stem (ATWS) was templated. After surgery, we compared both parameters previously measured in the preoperative x-rays with the 50 postoperative radiographs where the short stem was implanted obtaining the real bone preservation at the femoral neck and the real diaphyseal invasion length.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For templating comparison, mean bone preservation at the femoral neck was 14.87mm (SD 3.64) for the ANPS group and 9.94mm (SD 8.39) for the ATWS group (p &lt;0.001). The mean diaphyseal bone invasion was 47.21mm (SD 5.89) and 76.77mm (SD 8.39) for ANPS and ATWS respectively (p &lt;0.001). After surgery, the mean postoperative bone preservation at the femoral neck was 15.08mm (SD 3.1) with a mean of 0.17mm (SD 0.51) more preservation in the preoperative group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>1. ANPS allow bone preservation with limited diaphyseal invasion when compared with his homonymous ATWS in the preoperative templates. 2. ANPS showed a good correlation between preoperative radiographs and real bone preservation of the femoral neck and invasion of the femoral shaft.</p>","PeriodicalId":19622,"journal":{"name":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","volume":"1 1","pages":"143-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.7976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aim to compare the preoperative planning radiographs of 50 patients in whom both a short stem and its homonymous standard version were programmed, focusing on the preservation of the neck and the invasion of the femoral shaft. The secondary objective was to evaluate the 50 preoperative radiographs with the 50 postoperative radiographs in which the short stem was implanted, measuring the real invasion of the diaphysis and the real preservation of the femoral neck.

Material and methods: We measured cut level at the femoral neck and diaphyseal invasion in 50 preoperative x-rays where an Alteon Neck Preserving Stem (ANPS) was templated and we compared it with 50 preoperative x-rays where an Alteon Taper Wedge Stem (ATWS) was templated. After surgery, we compared both parameters previously measured in the preoperative x-rays with the 50 postoperative radiographs where the short stem was implanted obtaining the real bone preservation at the femoral neck and the real diaphyseal invasion length.

Results: For templating comparison, mean bone preservation at the femoral neck was 14.87mm (SD 3.64) for the ANPS group and 9.94mm (SD 8.39) for the ATWS group (p <0.001). The mean diaphyseal bone invasion was 47.21mm (SD 5.89) and 76.77mm (SD 8.39) for ANPS and ATWS respectively (p <0.001). After surgery, the mean postoperative bone preservation at the femoral neck was 15.08mm (SD 3.1) with a mean of 0.17mm (SD 0.51) more preservation in the preoperative group.

Conclusion: 1. ANPS allow bone preservation with limited diaphyseal invasion when compared with his homonymous ATWS in the preoperative templates. 2. ANPS showed a good correlation between preoperative radiographs and real bone preservation of the femoral neck and invasion of the femoral shaft.

股骨颈保存和骨干受累:骨痂-干骺端短干与标准股干的比较。放射学研究
背景。我们的目的是比较50例患者的术前计划x线片,其中短柄和相同的标准版本都被编程,重点是保留颈部和侵犯股骨干。次要目的是评估50张术前x线片和50张术后植入短柄的x线片,测量骨干的真实侵犯和股骨颈的真实保存。材料和方法。我们测量了50张术前模板化Alteon颈部保留干(ANPS)的股骨颈和骨干侵入处的切口水平,并将其与模板化Alteon锥形楔形干(ATWS)的50张术前x光片进行了比较。手术后,我们将术前x线片测量的两个参数与术后植入短柄的50张x线片进行了比较,获得了股骨颈处真正的骨保存和真正的骨干侵入长度。对于模板比较,ANPS组股骨颈的平均骨保留量为14.87mm (SD 3.64), ATWS组为9.94mm (SD 8.39) (p <0.001)。ANPS和ATWS的平均骨干骨侵犯分别为47.21mm (SD 5.89)和76.77mm (SD 8.39) (p <0.001)。术后股骨颈骨保留平均为15.08mm (SD 3.1),术前组股骨颈骨保留平均为0.17mm (SD 0.51)。1. 与术前模板中相同的ATWS相比,ANPS可以保留骨,但对骨干的侵犯有限。2. ANPS显示术前x线片与股骨颈的真实骨保存和股骨干的侵犯有良好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信