The Relief Problem: Some Notes from an Art Historian

IF 0.2 2区 艺术学 0 ART
Yudong Wang
{"title":"The Relief Problem: Some Notes from an Art Historian","authors":"Yudong Wang","doi":"10.3998/ars.13441566.0048.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines the factural and phenomenological aspects of some relief works of the remote and recent past, ranging from Buddhist sculptural and pictorial reliefs made in China, Central Asia, and India to relief works by Donatello (ca. 1386– 1466) and the American sculptor Natalie Charkow Hollander (b. 1933). While some of the works under discussion are historically connected to one another, most are not. By zooming in on relief works and the verbal descriptions about them, the essay reveals the signification that relief, as a liminal art medium between painting and sculpture in the round, enforces on its maker and viewer across cultures and throughout history, due to the visual and tactile ambiguity that it effects between concealment and disclosure. Three Experiments with Relief in Early Medieval China The introduction of Indic art practices and theories, which traveled along with Buddhism, intensified art production in early medieval China. The three artistic experiments discussed in the first half of this essay took place during this age of artistic intensification, the fifth and sixth centuries CE. They demonstrate the different ways in which artists in China, in the grip of things Indic, reflected upon and grappled with the nature and characteristics of both painting and sculpture. In different ways, these experiments were the result of new understandings about the potential of the wall surface as an artistic support, with “wall” used in its broadest sense. Such attempts were trials with modes of wall reliefs and wall paintings. The first experiment pertains to stone carving. A Buddhist stele from Chengdu (Sichuan) dated 523 can help us appreciate the tactics that the artist employed to realize an artistic ideal in stone relief carving. On the back of the stele is a relief on two planes, a mode of relief also seen frequently in preBuddhist carvings in various regions of China during the Han period (206 BCE– 220 CE), including Sichuan (fig. 1).1 Relief as such developed from outline drawing, and the end result does not go much beyond a drawing; the surface around the outline of the figures is cut back to leave raised silhouettes that are then made into more elaborate images by incising details and faintly modeling the surface. To borrow L.R. Rogers’s words in describing this kind of relief, figures are not treated “as corporeal bodies in their own right, but are, so to speak, bound to the surface, or spread upon it, or otherwise integrated with it in ways that","PeriodicalId":54021,"journal":{"name":"ARS Orientalis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARS Orientalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/ars.13441566.0048.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This essay examines the factural and phenomenological aspects of some relief works of the remote and recent past, ranging from Buddhist sculptural and pictorial reliefs made in China, Central Asia, and India to relief works by Donatello (ca. 1386– 1466) and the American sculptor Natalie Charkow Hollander (b. 1933). While some of the works under discussion are historically connected to one another, most are not. By zooming in on relief works and the verbal descriptions about them, the essay reveals the signification that relief, as a liminal art medium between painting and sculpture in the round, enforces on its maker and viewer across cultures and throughout history, due to the visual and tactile ambiguity that it effects between concealment and disclosure. Three Experiments with Relief in Early Medieval China The introduction of Indic art practices and theories, which traveled along with Buddhism, intensified art production in early medieval China. The three artistic experiments discussed in the first half of this essay took place during this age of artistic intensification, the fifth and sixth centuries CE. They demonstrate the different ways in which artists in China, in the grip of things Indic, reflected upon and grappled with the nature and characteristics of both painting and sculpture. In different ways, these experiments were the result of new understandings about the potential of the wall surface as an artistic support, with “wall” used in its broadest sense. Such attempts were trials with modes of wall reliefs and wall paintings. The first experiment pertains to stone carving. A Buddhist stele from Chengdu (Sichuan) dated 523 can help us appreciate the tactics that the artist employed to realize an artistic ideal in stone relief carving. On the back of the stele is a relief on two planes, a mode of relief also seen frequently in preBuddhist carvings in various regions of China during the Han period (206 BCE– 220 CE), including Sichuan (fig. 1).1 Relief as such developed from outline drawing, and the end result does not go much beyond a drawing; the surface around the outline of the figures is cut back to leave raised silhouettes that are then made into more elaborate images by incising details and faintly modeling the surface. To borrow L.R. Rogers’s words in describing this kind of relief, figures are not treated “as corporeal bodies in their own right, but are, so to speak, bound to the surface, or spread upon it, or otherwise integrated with it in ways that
救济问题:一位艺术史学家的笔记
本文考察了一些遥远和近代的浮雕作品的事实和现象学方面,从中国、中亚和印度制造的佛教雕塑和图像浮雕,到多纳泰罗(约1386-1466)和美国雕塑家娜塔莉·查考·霍兰德(Natalie Charkow Hollander)(b.1933)的浮雕作品。虽然正在讨论的一些作品在历史上是相互联系的,但大多数作品并不是。通过对浮雕作品及其语言描述的深入研究,揭示了浮雕作为介于绘画和雕塑之间的一种边缘艺术媒介,由于其在隐藏和揭示之间产生的视觉和触觉上的模糊性,在不同文化和历史中对其制作者和观看者产生了强制作用。中世纪早期中国的三次浮雕实验印度艺术实践和理论的引入,伴随着佛教的传播,加强了中世纪早期中国艺术的生产。本文前半部分讨论的三个艺术实验发生在公元五世纪和六世纪这个艺术强化的时代。它们展示了中国艺术家在印度事物的掌控下,反思和处理绘画和雕塑的本质和特征的不同方式。在不同的方面,这些实验是对墙面作为艺术支撑的潜力的新理解的结果,“墙”在最广泛的意义上被使用。这种尝试是对墙壁浮雕和墙壁绘画模式的尝试。第一个实验与石雕有关。一块523年的四川成都石碑可以帮助我们理解艺术家在浮雕中实现艺术理想的策略。石碑背面是两个平面的浮雕,这种浮雕模式在汉代(公元前206年至公元前220年)中国各地区的佛教前雕刻中也很常见,包括四川(图1);人物轮廓周围的表面被剪掉,留下凸起的轮廓,然后通过切割细节和对表面进行模糊建模,将轮廓制成更精细的图像。借用L.R.Rogers在描述这种解脱时的话,人物本身并没有被视为“有形的身体”,而是可以说,被束缚在表面,或在表面上传播,或以其他方式与之融合
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARS Orientalis
ARS Orientalis Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信