Women during the Covid-19 lockdown: more anxiety symptoms in women with children than without children and role of the resilience

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
E. Benassi, M. Vallone, Michela Camia, M. Scorza
{"title":"Women during the Covid-19 lockdown: more anxiety symptoms in women with children than without children and role of the resilience","authors":"E. Benassi, M. Vallone, Michela Camia, M. Scorza","doi":"10.6092/2282-1619/MJCP-2559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds. In addition to being a public physical health emergency, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been identified as a psychological health emergency of global concern. The emergency measures implemented by the Italian Government from March to June 2020 included drastic limitations to living conditions that may have impacted on women with children in particular. Nevertheless, few studies focused on them investigating psychopathological consequences of lockdown and protective factors for mental health. Aims. First aim was to examine differences on generalized anxiety symptoms between working women with children and without children; second, we investigated whether psychological resilience contributed to low emotional impact of the COVID-19 lockdown. Method. An online survey was administered to 516 working mothers and 514 working women without children. Participants responded to Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD7) and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 25). Results. Significant differences emerged between the two groups, with higher symptoms and percentages of generalized anxiety disorders (GADs) in the group of mothers relative to women without children. Regression analysis showed that CD-RISC 25 score, more than having/not having children, had a predictive effect on GAD7 score, concurring to reduce anxiety symptoms. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that dealing with lockdown was a particularly stressful experience for working mothers who had to balance personal life, work, and raising children without other resources. Resilience may be a protection against emotional problems and supportive interventions should be implemented in the present and in the future to promote mental health in this population.","PeriodicalId":18428,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"8 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/MJCP-2559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Backgrounds. In addition to being a public physical health emergency, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been identified as a psychological health emergency of global concern. The emergency measures implemented by the Italian Government from March to June 2020 included drastic limitations to living conditions that may have impacted on women with children in particular. Nevertheless, few studies focused on them investigating psychopathological consequences of lockdown and protective factors for mental health. Aims. First aim was to examine differences on generalized anxiety symptoms between working women with children and without children; second, we investigated whether psychological resilience contributed to low emotional impact of the COVID-19 lockdown. Method. An online survey was administered to 516 working mothers and 514 working women without children. Participants responded to Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD7) and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 25). Results. Significant differences emerged between the two groups, with higher symptoms and percentages of generalized anxiety disorders (GADs) in the group of mothers relative to women without children. Regression analysis showed that CD-RISC 25 score, more than having/not having children, had a predictive effect on GAD7 score, concurring to reduce anxiety symptoms. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that dealing with lockdown was a particularly stressful experience for working mothers who had to balance personal life, work, and raising children without other resources. Resilience may be a protection against emotional problems and supportive interventions should be implemented in the present and in the future to promote mental health in this population.
新冠肺炎封锁期间的女性:有孩子的女性比没有孩子的女性出现更多的焦虑症状,以及韧性的作用
背景。2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)除了是公共身体健康紧急事件外,还被确定为全球关注的心理健康紧急事件。意大利政府于2020年3月至6月实施的紧急措施包括严格限制生活条件,这可能特别影响到有孩子的妇女。然而,很少有研究集中在他们身上,调查封锁的精神病理后果和心理健康的保护因素。目标第一个目的是检查有孩子和没有孩子的职业妇女在广泛性焦虑症状上的差异;其次,我们调查了心理弹性是否有助于降低COVID-19封锁的情绪影响。方法。这项在线调查对516名职业母亲和514名没有孩子的职业女性进行了调查。参与者对广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD7)和康纳-戴维森弹性量表(CD-RISC 25)有反应。结果。两组之间出现了显著差异,与没有孩子的妇女相比,母亲组的广泛性焦虑症(GADs)的症状和百分比更高。回归分析显示,CD-RISC 25评分比生育/未生育对GAD7评分有更大的预测作用,同时也能减轻焦虑症状。结论。我们的研究结果表明,对于那些必须在没有其他资源的情况下平衡个人生活、工作和抚养孩子的职业母亲来说,应对封锁是一种特别紧张的经历。恢复力可能是对情绪问题的一种保护,应该在现在和将来实施支持性干预措施,以促进这一人群的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
53.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The MJCP is an Open Access Peer-Reviewed International Journal in Clinical Psychology. MJCP accepts research related to innovative and important areas of clinical research: 1. Clinical studies related to Clinical Psychology, 2. Psychopathology and Psychotherapy; 3. Basic studies pertaining to clinical psychology field as experimental psychology, psychoneuroendocrinology and psychoanalysis; 4. Growing application of clinical techniques in clinical psychology, psychology of health, clinical approaches in projective methods; 5. Forensic psychology in clinical research; 6. Psychology of art and religion; 7. Advanced in basic and clinical research methodology including qualitative and quantitative research and new research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信