Black vs. White, Life vs. Death; Using Automatic vs. Controlled Processing as a Framework for Understanding Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System

S. Mannes
{"title":"Black vs. White, Life vs. Death; Using Automatic vs. Controlled Processing as a Framework for Understanding Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System","authors":"S. Mannes","doi":"10.4172/2157-7145.1000365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An extensive amount of social science research has been conducted on issues related to the criminal justice \n system. From the moment a crime is witnessed until a verdict and sentence have been rendered there exists \n opportunity for the human cognitive system to distort and misinterpret data about a crime, about the suspect, and \n about the process itself. The research presented here describes, in easy to understand terms, some of the empirical \n research that points out disadvantages minorities face within the system, differences in the way in which trial \n information is received and evaluated, and provides a framework that may potentially lend itself to methods for \n mitigating these disadvantages and individual differences.","PeriodicalId":90216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensics research","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.1000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An extensive amount of social science research has been conducted on issues related to the criminal justice system. From the moment a crime is witnessed until a verdict and sentence have been rendered there exists opportunity for the human cognitive system to distort and misinterpret data about a crime, about the suspect, and about the process itself. The research presented here describes, in easy to understand terms, some of the empirical research that points out disadvantages minorities face within the system, differences in the way in which trial information is received and evaluated, and provides a framework that may potentially lend itself to methods for mitigating these disadvantages and individual differences.
黑与白,生与死;使用自动与控制处理作为理解刑事司法系统中种族差异的框架
对与刑事司法制度有关的问题进行了大量的社会科学研究。从目击犯罪的那一刻起,直到做出判决和判决,人类的认知系统都有机会扭曲和误解有关犯罪、嫌疑人和过程本身的数据。本文的研究以通俗易懂的方式描述了一些实证研究,这些研究指出了少数群体在体制内面临的劣势,以及审判信息接受和评估方式的差异,并提供了一个框架,可能有助于找到减轻这些劣势和个体差异的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信