Effect of Exercise Duration Toward Heart Rate Recovery in Elderly

Arie Ramdhiani Mahassa, M. R. Akbar, S. Y. Sari
{"title":"Effect of Exercise Duration Toward Heart Rate Recovery in Elderly","authors":"Arie Ramdhiani Mahassa, M. R. Akbar, S. Y. Sari","doi":"10.30701/IJC.1025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Age-related change in autonomic nerves covers parasympathetic function decrease that hampers heart rate (HR) control. The effective attempt to improve autonomic nervous function for elderly is routine exercise, however exercise duration among elderly is not always standardized. This study is aimed to compare the effect of different exercise duration to post-exercise Heart Rate Recovery (HRR) between two elderly groups with the same frequency, intensity, type criteria of routine exercise. Methods: Method was cross-sectional study which compared exercise duration of standardized group (3x90 minutes/week) and unstandardized group (3x30 minutes/week). Group 1 was elders with standardized duration from Healthy Heart Club and Group 2 was elders who take unstandardized duration from Elderly Home in Bandung city. Each group consisted of 43 elders and data were collected in July-August 2019. After one hour of medium intensity exercise, all respondents were examined for resting HR (HRrest), maximum HR (HRmax), one minute post-exercise HR, and four minutes post-exercise HR. HRR was obtained by subtracting HRmax by one minute post-exercise HR and normal if > 12 bpm. Analysis data was done by SPSS with Mann-Whitney U Test, Fisher Chi Square and Logistic regression. Results: Most of respondents were 60-69 years old and female. Respondents in unstandardized group were more low education, hypertension and smoking. The HRrest of both groups was categorized as normal but increased greater (30x/min) in standardized group. The result showed a significant difference in comparation of median HRR (p=0.001) and number of normal and abnormal HRR (p=0.001) between both groups. Gender, smoking and standardized duration of exercise associated with abnormality of HRR, elders who take unstandardized duration have 12.7 times risk to get abnormal HRR. Conclusion: Routine exercise for elderly is recommended in standardized duration with minimal 150 minutes per week in order to increase post-exercise HRR. (Indonesian J Cardiol. 2020;41:17-24)","PeriodicalId":32916,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30701/IJC.1025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Age-related change in autonomic nerves covers parasympathetic function decrease that hampers heart rate (HR) control. The effective attempt to improve autonomic nervous function for elderly is routine exercise, however exercise duration among elderly is not always standardized. This study is aimed to compare the effect of different exercise duration to post-exercise Heart Rate Recovery (HRR) between two elderly groups with the same frequency, intensity, type criteria of routine exercise. Methods: Method was cross-sectional study which compared exercise duration of standardized group (3x90 minutes/week) and unstandardized group (3x30 minutes/week). Group 1 was elders with standardized duration from Healthy Heart Club and Group 2 was elders who take unstandardized duration from Elderly Home in Bandung city. Each group consisted of 43 elders and data were collected in July-August 2019. After one hour of medium intensity exercise, all respondents were examined for resting HR (HRrest), maximum HR (HRmax), one minute post-exercise HR, and four minutes post-exercise HR. HRR was obtained by subtracting HRmax by one minute post-exercise HR and normal if > 12 bpm. Analysis data was done by SPSS with Mann-Whitney U Test, Fisher Chi Square and Logistic regression. Results: Most of respondents were 60-69 years old and female. Respondents in unstandardized group were more low education, hypertension and smoking. The HRrest of both groups was categorized as normal but increased greater (30x/min) in standardized group. The result showed a significant difference in comparation of median HRR (p=0.001) and number of normal and abnormal HRR (p=0.001) between both groups. Gender, smoking and standardized duration of exercise associated with abnormality of HRR, elders who take unstandardized duration have 12.7 times risk to get abnormal HRR. Conclusion: Routine exercise for elderly is recommended in standardized duration with minimal 150 minutes per week in order to increase post-exercise HRR. (Indonesian J Cardiol. 2020;41:17-24)
运动时间对老年人心率恢复的影响
背景:与年龄相关的自主神经变化涵盖了副交感神经功能的下降,阻碍了心率(HR)的控制。改善老年人自主神经功能的有效尝试是常规锻炼,但老年人的锻炼时间并不总是标准化的。本研究旨在比较两组具有相同频率、强度和常规运动类型标准的老年人不同运动时间对运动后心率恢复(HRR)的影响。方法:采用横断面研究的方法,比较标准化组(3x90分钟/周)和非标准化组的运动时长(3x30分钟/周)。第1组为健康心俱乐部标准化时长的老年人,第2组为万隆市敬老院非标准时长的老人。每组由43名老年人组成,数据收集于2019年7月至8月。中等强度运动一小时后,所有受访者都接受了静息HR(HRrest)、最大HR(HRmax)、运动后一分钟HR和运动后四分钟HR的检查。HRR是通过将HRmax减去运动后1分钟HR获得的,如果>12 bpm,则为正常。数据分析采用SPSS软件进行Mann-Whitney U检验、Fisher卡方检验和Logistic回归。结果:调查对象多为60-69岁女性。非标准组的受试者更多是低学历、高血压和吸烟。两组的HRrest均被归类为正常,但在标准化组中增加更大(30x/min)。结果显示,两组之间的中位HRR(p=0.001)和正常和异常HRR数量(p=001)的比较存在显著差异。性别、吸烟和标准化运动时间与HRR异常相关,服用非标准时间的老年人患HRR异常的风险是正常老年人的12.7倍。结论:建议老年人每周至少进行150分钟的标准化运动,以提高运动后的HRR。(印尼心脏病学杂志2020;41:17-24)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信