A Comparative Study of the Nursing Undergraduate Program in Iran, England, and Canada

M. Sarhadi, E. Nohi, Sakineh Sabzevari, H. Moein, Asma Abdollahyar
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Nursing Undergraduate Program in Iran, England, and Canada","authors":"M. Sarhadi, E. Nohi, Sakineh Sabzevari, H. Moein, Asma Abdollahyar","doi":"10.29252/DSME.7.2.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"one the key of higher which requires and review. The world is witnessing the institutionalization of an efficient system, so this study aimed to compare the Nursing Program practical for Methods: In this comparative descriptive-comparative study, the of the Nursing Schools of England and Canada that were purposefully selected and analyzed based on Beredy model. Results: According to the findings, the overall goals and educational content of the study programs were somewhat similar, but the organization and formulation of the contents on one hand and on the other, the amount and type of content varied, which eventually created a totally different content. Also, despite numerous similarities in the techniques used in teaching and evaluation, various differences were observed depending on the level and objectives of the program. Conclusion: It seems that although the educational curriculum of Iran is not in a bad position compared to the educational programs studied, in order to eliminate its shortcomings, such as objective selection, student evaluation, research, teaching methods and evaluation theory and practice need to be seriously reviewed and refined.","PeriodicalId":32175,"journal":{"name":"Development Strategies in Medical Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Strategies in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/DSME.7.2.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

one the key of higher which requires and review. The world is witnessing the institutionalization of an efficient system, so this study aimed to compare the Nursing Program practical for Methods: In this comparative descriptive-comparative study, the of the Nursing Schools of England and Canada that were purposefully selected and analyzed based on Beredy model. Results: According to the findings, the overall goals and educational content of the study programs were somewhat similar, but the organization and formulation of the contents on one hand and on the other, the amount and type of content varied, which eventually created a totally different content. Also, despite numerous similarities in the techniques used in teaching and evaluation, various differences were observed depending on the level and objectives of the program. Conclusion: It seems that although the educational curriculum of Iran is not in a bad position compared to the educational programs studied, in order to eliminate its shortcomings, such as objective selection, student evaluation, research, teaching methods and evaluation theory and practice need to be seriously reviewed and refined.
伊朗、英国和加拿大护理本科生项目的比较研究
一个要求和复习的更高的关键。世界正在见证一个高效体系的制度化,因此本研究旨在比较护理课程的实践方法:在这个比较描述比较研究中,有目的地选择了英国和加拿大的护理学校,并基于Beredy模型进行了分析。结果:从研究结果来看,学习项目的总体目标和教育内容有一定的相似性,但内容的组织和制定,内容的数量和类型都有所不同,最终形成了完全不同的内容。此外,尽管在教学和评估中使用的技术有许多相似之处,但根据项目的水平和目标,观察到各种差异。结论:虽然与所研究的教育方案相比,伊朗的教育课程似乎并不差,但为了消除其在客观选择、学生评价、研究、教学方法和评价理论与实践等方面的不足,需要认真审查和完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书