Co-detection of respiratory syncytial virus with other respiratory viruses across all age groups before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2 Q4 VIROLOGY
Haya Hayek, Justin Z. Amarin, Yasmeen Z. Qwaider, A. Khanfar, Tess Stopczynski, J. Schmitz, J. Chappell, J. Wrenn, A. Spieker, N. Halasa, L. Howard
{"title":"Co-detection of respiratory syncytial virus with other respiratory viruses across all age groups before and during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Haya Hayek, Justin Z. Amarin, Yasmeen Z. Qwaider, A. Khanfar, Tess Stopczynski, J. Schmitz, J. Chappell, J. Wrenn, A. Spieker, N. Halasa, L. Howard","doi":"10.3389/fviro.2023.1156012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Patterns of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) co-detection with other viruses may have been disrupted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but the clinical impact of viral co-detections with RSV is not well-established. We aimed to explore the frequency and clinical outcomes associated with RSV single detection and co-detection before and during the pandemic. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of all children and adults with respiratory samples tested using a respiratory pathogen panel (RPP; 01/01/2018–11/30/2022), a provider-ordered polymerase chain reaction–based assay that detects respiratory pathogens. We stratified our cohort into age groups: 0–4, 5–17, 18–64, and ≥65 years old. Among RSV-positive samples, we compared the proportion of samples with single RSV detection before and during the pandemic and the patterns of specific viral co-detections. We compared the odds of hospitalization, oxygen use, intensive care unit admission, and intubation between individuals with RSV single detection and those with co-detection. Results Among 57,940 samples collected during the study period, 3,986 (6.9%) were RSV-positive. RSV was co-detected with at least one other virus in 1,231/3,158 (39.0%), 104/348 (29.9%), 49/312 (15.7%), and 21/168 (12.5%) of samples from individuals 0–4, 5–17, 18–64, and ≥65 years old, respectively. The relative frequencies of RSV single detection and co-detection were comparable before and during the pandemic except in children 0–4 years old, in whom single RSV detections were more prevalent before (63.7%) than during (59.5%) the pandemic (p=0.021). In children 0–4 years old, RSV co-detection was associated with lower odds of hospitalization compared to single RSV detection, and RSV co-detection with parainfluenza viruses or human rhinovirus/enterovirus was associated with significantly lower odds of hospitalization, while RSV/SARS-CoV-2 co-detection was associated with higher odds of ICU admission. In adults ≥65 years old, RSV co-detection was associated with lower odds of oxygen use. Conclusion The proportion of RSV co-detection did not appreciably vary before and during the pandemic, except in young children, though the combinations of co-detected viruses did vary. Our findings suggest that the clinical impact of RSV co-detection with other viruses may be age-associated and virus-specific.","PeriodicalId":73114,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in virology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fviro.2023.1156012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Patterns of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) co-detection with other viruses may have been disrupted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but the clinical impact of viral co-detections with RSV is not well-established. We aimed to explore the frequency and clinical outcomes associated with RSV single detection and co-detection before and during the pandemic. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of all children and adults with respiratory samples tested using a respiratory pathogen panel (RPP; 01/01/2018–11/30/2022), a provider-ordered polymerase chain reaction–based assay that detects respiratory pathogens. We stratified our cohort into age groups: 0–4, 5–17, 18–64, and ≥65 years old. Among RSV-positive samples, we compared the proportion of samples with single RSV detection before and during the pandemic and the patterns of specific viral co-detections. We compared the odds of hospitalization, oxygen use, intensive care unit admission, and intubation between individuals with RSV single detection and those with co-detection. Results Among 57,940 samples collected during the study period, 3,986 (6.9%) were RSV-positive. RSV was co-detected with at least one other virus in 1,231/3,158 (39.0%), 104/348 (29.9%), 49/312 (15.7%), and 21/168 (12.5%) of samples from individuals 0–4, 5–17, 18–64, and ≥65 years old, respectively. The relative frequencies of RSV single detection and co-detection were comparable before and during the pandemic except in children 0–4 years old, in whom single RSV detections were more prevalent before (63.7%) than during (59.5%) the pandemic (p=0.021). In children 0–4 years old, RSV co-detection was associated with lower odds of hospitalization compared to single RSV detection, and RSV co-detection with parainfluenza viruses or human rhinovirus/enterovirus was associated with significantly lower odds of hospitalization, while RSV/SARS-CoV-2 co-detection was associated with higher odds of ICU admission. In adults ≥65 years old, RSV co-detection was associated with lower odds of oxygen use. Conclusion The proportion of RSV co-detection did not appreciably vary before and during the pandemic, except in young children, though the combinations of co-detected viruses did vary. Our findings suggest that the clinical impact of RSV co-detection with other viruses may be age-associated and virus-specific.
在COVID-19大流行之前和期间对所有年龄组的呼吸道合胞病毒与其他呼吸道病毒进行联合检测
在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)与其他病毒共检测的模式可能已被破坏,但病毒与RSV共检测的临床影响尚未确定。我们的目的是探讨大流行前和大流行期间RSV单一检测和联合检测的频率和临床结果。方法:我们对所有儿童和成人进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,使用呼吸道病原体面板(RPP;2018年1月1日- 2022年11月30日),这是一种由供应商订购的基于聚合酶链反应的检测方法,可检测呼吸道病原体。我们将队列分层为年龄组:0-4岁、5-17岁、18-64岁和≥65岁。在RSV阳性样本中,我们比较了大流行前和大流行期间检测到单一RSV的样本比例以及特定病毒共同检测的模式。我们比较了单独检测RSV和同时检测RSV的患者的住院率、吸氧率、重症监护病房入院率和插管率。结果在57940份样本中,rsv阳性3986份(6.9%)。在0-4岁、5-17岁、18-64岁和≥65岁的人群中,分别有1231 / 3158(39.0%)、104/348(29.9%)、49/312(15.7%)和21/168(12.5%)与RSV共检出至少一种其他病毒。除0-4岁儿童外,流行前和流行期间RSV单检和共检的相对频率具有可比性,0-4岁儿童流行前(63.7%)高于流行期间(59.5%)(p=0.021)。在0-4岁儿童中,与单一RSV检测相比,RSV共检测与住院的几率较低,RSV与副流感病毒或人鼻病毒/肠道病毒共检测与住院的几率显著较低,而RSV/SARS-CoV-2共检测与ICU住院的几率较高。在≥65岁的成年人中,RSV联合检测与较低的氧气使用几率相关。结论除幼儿外,RSV共检比例在大流行前和大流行期间没有明显变化,但共检病毒组合存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,RSV与其他病毒共同检测的临床影响可能与年龄相关且病毒特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信