Is A One-Question Visual Analog Scale A Screening Tool That Can Be Used to Assess Female Sexual Dysfunction Before Implementing A Female Sexual Function Index?
M. Koparal, E. C. Bulut, S. Çetin, M. Onaran, I. Sen
{"title":"Is A One-Question Visual Analog Scale A Screening Tool That Can Be Used to Assess Female Sexual Dysfunction Before Implementing A Female Sexual Function Index?","authors":"M. Koparal, E. C. Bulut, S. Çetin, M. Onaran, I. Sen","doi":"10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2022.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To validate the use of a single-question visual analog scale assessing sexual dysfunction as a screening tool before implementing the female sexual function index (FSFI). Materials and Methods: The study included 141 sexually active women over 18 years of age who were diagnosed with OAB or UI. A female sexual function-visual analog scale (FSF-VAS) was defined and developed as a one-question form in which participants were asked to mark their sexual function on a 10 cm visual analog scale. The cut-off values for the FSF-VAS in predicting FSD were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and Youden’s index. Results: A positive, moderately strong correlation was found between the FSFI score and FSF-VAS (rs=0.741). We found a cut-off value for FSF-VAS as 5.95 for in predicting both FSFI score of <25 [area under the curve (AUC) (confidence interval (CI) 95%): 0.886 (0.827-0.945)] and FSFI score of <26.55 [AUC (CI 95%): 0.893 (0.834-0.952)]. FSF-VAS value was below 5.95 in 82 of 141 (58.1%) patients who participated in the study. Conclusion: Using the FSFI for only those with a FSF-VAS score of 5.95 or lower will reduce the clinician’s Workload save time, and also spare patients from the embarrassment caused by the questions in the FSFI.","PeriodicalId":42050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urological Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2022.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To validate the use of a single-question visual analog scale assessing sexual dysfunction as a screening tool before implementing the female sexual function index (FSFI). Materials and Methods: The study included 141 sexually active women over 18 years of age who were diagnosed with OAB or UI. A female sexual function-visual analog scale (FSF-VAS) was defined and developed as a one-question form in which participants were asked to mark their sexual function on a 10 cm visual analog scale. The cut-off values for the FSF-VAS in predicting FSD were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and Youden’s index. Results: A positive, moderately strong correlation was found between the FSFI score and FSF-VAS (rs=0.741). We found a cut-off value for FSF-VAS as 5.95 for in predicting both FSFI score of <25 [area under the curve (AUC) (confidence interval (CI) 95%): 0.886 (0.827-0.945)] and FSFI score of <26.55 [AUC (CI 95%): 0.893 (0.834-0.952)]. FSF-VAS value was below 5.95 in 82 of 141 (58.1%) patients who participated in the study. Conclusion: Using the FSFI for only those with a FSF-VAS score of 5.95 or lower will reduce the clinician’s Workload save time, and also spare patients from the embarrassment caused by the questions in the FSFI.