Is A One-Question Visual Analog Scale A Screening Tool That Can Be Used to Assess Female Sexual Dysfunction Before Implementing A Female Sexual Function Index?

IF 0.1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
M. Koparal, E. C. Bulut, S. Çetin, M. Onaran, I. Sen
{"title":"Is A One-Question Visual Analog Scale A Screening Tool That Can Be Used to Assess Female Sexual Dysfunction Before Implementing A Female Sexual Function Index?","authors":"M. Koparal, E. C. Bulut, S. Çetin, M. Onaran, I. Sen","doi":"10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2022.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To validate the use of a single-question visual analog scale assessing sexual dysfunction as a screening tool before implementing the female sexual function index (FSFI). Materials and Methods: The study included 141 sexually active women over 18 years of age who were diagnosed with OAB or UI. A female sexual function-visual analog scale (FSF-VAS) was defined and developed as a one-question form in which participants were asked to mark their sexual function on a 10 cm visual analog scale. The cut-off values for the FSF-VAS in predicting FSD were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and Youden’s index. Results: A positive, moderately strong correlation was found between the FSFI score and FSF-VAS (rs=0.741). We found a cut-off value for FSF-VAS as 5.95 for in predicting both FSFI score of <25 [area under the curve (AUC) (confidence interval (CI) 95%): 0.886 (0.827-0.945)] and FSFI score of <26.55 [AUC (CI 95%): 0.893 (0.834-0.952)]. FSF-VAS value was below 5.95 in 82 of 141 (58.1%) patients who participated in the study. Conclusion: Using the FSFI for only those with a FSF-VAS score of 5.95 or lower will reduce the clinician’s Workload save time, and also spare patients from the embarrassment caused by the questions in the FSFI.","PeriodicalId":42050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urological Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2022.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To validate the use of a single-question visual analog scale assessing sexual dysfunction as a screening tool before implementing the female sexual function index (FSFI). Materials and Methods: The study included 141 sexually active women over 18 years of age who were diagnosed with OAB or UI. A female sexual function-visual analog scale (FSF-VAS) was defined and developed as a one-question form in which participants were asked to mark their sexual function on a 10 cm visual analog scale. The cut-off values for the FSF-VAS in predicting FSD were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and Youden’s index. Results: A positive, moderately strong correlation was found between the FSFI score and FSF-VAS (rs=0.741). We found a cut-off value for FSF-VAS as 5.95 for in predicting both FSFI score of <25 [area under the curve (AUC) (confidence interval (CI) 95%): 0.886 (0.827-0.945)] and FSFI score of <26.55 [AUC (CI 95%): 0.893 (0.834-0.952)]. FSF-VAS value was below 5.95 in 82 of 141 (58.1%) patients who participated in the study. Conclusion: Using the FSFI for only those with a FSF-VAS score of 5.95 or lower will reduce the clinician’s Workload save time, and also spare patients from the embarrassment caused by the questions in the FSFI.
在实施女性性功能指数之前,一个问题视觉模拟量表是一种可以用来评估女性性功能障碍的筛查工具吗?
目的:验证在实施女性性功能指数(FSFI)之前,将评估性功能障碍的单问题视觉模拟量表作为筛查工具的使用。材料和方法:该研究包括141名18岁以上的性活跃女性,她们被诊断为OAB或UI。女性性功能视觉模拟量表(FSF-VAS)被定义和开发为一个问题表,参与者被要求在10厘米的视觉模拟量上标记自己的性功能。FSF-VAS预测FSD的临界值通过受试者工作特性曲线分析和Youden指数确定。结果:A阳性,FSFI评分和FSF-VAS之间存在中等强度的相关性(rs=0.741)。我们发现FSF-VAS的临界值为5.95,用于预测FSFI评分<25[曲线下面积(AUC)(置信区间(CI)95%):0.886(0.827-0.945)]和FSFI评分<26.55[AUC(CI 95%):0.993(0.834-0.952)]。141名参与本研究的患者中,有82名(58.1%)的FSF-VAS值低于5.95学习结论:仅对FSF-VAS评分为5.95或更低的患者使用FSFI将减少临床医生的工作量,节省时间,并使患者免于因FSFI中的问题而引起的尴尬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urological Surgery
Journal of Urological Surgery UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信