Model-Based Evaluation of Decentralised Electricity Markets at Different Phases of the German Energy Transition

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
David Ritter, Christoph Heinemann, D. Bauknecht, Christian Winger, Franziska Flachsbarth
{"title":"Model-Based Evaluation of Decentralised Electricity Markets at Different Phases of the German Energy Transition","authors":"David Ritter, Christoph Heinemann, D. Bauknecht, Christian Winger, Franziska Flachsbarth","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.drit","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis is based on reviewing the following indicators that are derived from a model-based scenario analysis: CO 2 emissions of electricity generation; regional levels of self-supply with electricity; variable costs of electricity generation; grid congestion and grid expansion needs. The research question is twofold. Firstly, how does the size of decentralised markets affect the indicators mentioned. Secondly, which effects on these indicators can be observed if only power plants of a certain size or technology are allowed to take part in the decentralised markets.The analysis focuses on a system perspective and does not include effects on individual market players. In addition, it focuses on the electricity system with only some interactions with the heating or mobility sectors. The modelling work looks at the effects within the boundaries of a predefined scenario and for two scenario years. Dynamic effects such as a possible effect of decentralised markets on the overall deployment of RES-E technologies or storage systems is therefore not part of the analysis. The results are valid for the German electricity system and cannot necessarily be transferred to other countries or electricity systems with e.g. a weaker electricity grid or less interconnection to neighbouring countries.","PeriodicalId":45808,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.drit","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The analysis is based on reviewing the following indicators that are derived from a model-based scenario analysis: CO 2 emissions of electricity generation; regional levels of self-supply with electricity; variable costs of electricity generation; grid congestion and grid expansion needs. The research question is twofold. Firstly, how does the size of decentralised markets affect the indicators mentioned. Secondly, which effects on these indicators can be observed if only power plants of a certain size or technology are allowed to take part in the decentralised markets.The analysis focuses on a system perspective and does not include effects on individual market players. In addition, it focuses on the electricity system with only some interactions with the heating or mobility sectors. The modelling work looks at the effects within the boundaries of a predefined scenario and for two scenario years. Dynamic effects such as a possible effect of decentralised markets on the overall deployment of RES-E technologies or storage systems is therefore not part of the analysis. The results are valid for the German electricity system and cannot necessarily be transferred to other countries or electricity systems with e.g. a weaker electricity grid or less interconnection to neighbouring countries.
德国能源转型不同阶段分散式电力市场的模型评价
这项分析是根据审查下列从基于模型的情景分析得出的指标进行的:发电的二氧化碳排放量;区域电力自给水平;发电可变成本;电网拥塞和电网扩张需求。研究的问题是双重的。首先,去中心化市场的规模如何影响上述指标。其次,如果只允许一定规模或技术的发电厂参与分散市场,可以观察到对这些指标的影响。该分析侧重于系统视角,不包括对单个市场参与者的影响。此外,它侧重于电力系统,仅与供暖或交通部门有一些互动。建模工作着眼于在一个预先确定的情景和两个情景年范围内的影响。因此,诸如分散市场对RES-E技术或存储系统整体部署的可能影响之类的动态影响不在分析范围之内。研究结果对德国电力系统是有效的,不一定适用于其他国家或电网较弱或与邻国互连较少的电力系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信